Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Trump is a DICTATOR. Period.

13468916

Comments

  • edited January 23

    Warning! The thoughts expressed below are a satirical parody, based on my perception of the prevailing attitudes during the Clinton administration. You may not agree, and it may trigger strong reactions. Viewer discretion is advised.

    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that? I would, too. Even Jimmy Carter said that he had lust in his heart. I believe that he was a decent and honorable man. I voted for him. Bill Clinton liked young girls, too. I voted for him. When he was president, the economy was pretty good. I was making good money and had no complaints. Whatever he did behind the Oval Office didn’t affect my paycheck. The Epstein files are just a distraction. Wake up, dummy!

  • We’re talking about underage girls here…some as young as 13.

  • edited January 18

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that? I would, too. Even Jimmy Carter said that he had lust in his heart. I believe that he was a decent and honorable man. I voted for him. Bill Clinton liked young girls, too. I voted for him. When he was president, the economy was pretty good. I was making good money and had no complaints. Whatever he did behind the Oval Office didn’t affect my paycheck. The Epstein files are just a distraction. Wake up, dummy!

    WTF?!

  • @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that?

    Sex with under age children is wrong. It is also illegal.

    If the President or anyone else is guilty of this then they need to be arrested and face a court.

    The Epstein files are not "just a distraction".

  • This guy has to be fucking with us right? Between what he just said and the other thread...

  • Its not JUST that they were underaged and THAT alone is illegal AND immoral

    Its not JUST that there are people trying to justify the exploitation by saying "they knew what they were doing" or "that, you know, 13 -16 year olds aren't 'children' " (hello pedo apologist megan kelly)

    Its not JUST that they thought "releasing the files" was a good idea because they could trick people into voting for them as a "protect the children" psyop - esp since they promised that it would bring down the enemy

    It IS that there ARE MORE people (at least 10) and MUCH MORE MONEY (billions) -- INTERNATIONAL money and royalty involved

    It IS that Epstein is in the Trump files as a pedo best friend for more than 10 years and whom Epstein made his own modeling agency businesses, black-mailed people, influenced donors politicians arms dealers...

    It IS that Trump EITHER KNEW and did nothing ( which bestie for more that 10yrs doesnt know what their buddy is up to - and then there is the birthday card)

    It IS that Trump might have even participated in abusing people for sexual exploitation or violence for his own jollies or access to power

    and NOW he's covering it all up either for himself or for OTHERS to whom he is beholden or is looking to protect for "favors"

    ITS CORRUPTION ALL THE WAY DOWN
    Bondi knows
    Kash knows
    Bongino knows
    probably all of the Republicans know
    and I'm damn sure the people who funded his presidential runs know and knew

  • @audiblevideo said:
    So just last night filed by Trumps wholly co-opted “Department of Justice” regarding Epstein:

    Trump declares in a court filing, an “legal” argument that federal courts don’t have the authority to make rulings on the Epstein Transparency Act and thus there is no way to enforce the law at all.

    Capture, corruption, or delegitimization of the legislature. Capture, corruption, or delegitimization of the courts.

    This is what dictators do. Trump is assigning and trying to assume all power is inherent in the presidency.

    TL;DR
    all the RULES for you. None for me (and my allies - as long as they have complete loyalty to me)
    Or

    Pam Says Federal Courts Don't Have Power to Enforce Federal Laws <<

    Or shorter

    >

    I don’t claim to be an expert in legal matters, but I do know that Trump himself did no such thing, “…declare in a court filing…”. The court filing came from the DOJ itself.> @Simon said:

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that?

    Sex with under age children is wrong. It is also illegal.

    If the President or anyone else is guilty of this then they need to be arrested and face a court.

    The Epstein files are not "just a distraction".

    The Epstein files were collected under Joe Biden’s administration, not Trump’s. Right? And Epstein died after being taken into custody by Biden’s FBI… Why didn’t Biden order everything released back then? I think if no one can honestly answer that then criticisms of Trump or his DOJ are just partisan cherry picking.

  • edited January 18

    @NeuM said:
    The Epstein files were collected under Joe Biden’s administration, not Trump’s. Right? And Epstein died after being taken into custody by Biden’s FBI… Why didn’t Biden order everything released back then? I think if no one can honestly answer that then criticisms of Trump or his DOJ are just partisan cherry picking.

    I don't care who collected them or when. The full truth has to come out. No protection for pedos. Right?

  • edited January 18

    @NeuM said:

    @audiblevideo said:
    So just last night filed by Trumps wholly co-opted “Department of Justice” regarding Epstein:

    Trump declares in a court filing, an “legal” argument that federal courts don’t have the authority to make rulings on the Epstein Transparency Act and thus there is no way to enforce the law at all.

    Capture, corruption, or delegitimization of the legislature. Capture, corruption, or delegitimization of the courts.

    This is what dictators do. Trump is assigning and trying to assume all power is inherent in the presidency.

    TL;DR
    all the RULES for you. None for me (and my allies - as long as they have complete loyalty to me)
    Or

    Pam Says Federal Courts Don't Have Power to Enforce Federal Laws <<

    Or shorter

    >

    I don’t claim to be an expert in legal matters, but I do know that Trump himself did no such thing, “…declare in a court filing…”. The court filing came from the DOJ itself.> @Simon said:

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that?

    Sex with under age children is wrong. It is also illegal.

    If the President or anyone else is guilty of this then they need to be arrested and face a court.

    The Epstein files are not "just a distraction".

    The Epstein files were collected under Joe Biden’s administration, not Trump’s. Right? And Epstein died after being taken into custody by Biden’s FBI… Why didn’t Biden order everything released back then? I think if no one can honestly answer that then criticisms of Trump or his DOJ are just partisan cherry picking.

    The files were not released because it was an ongoing investigation. They could not be released. Blondie Bondi shut down the investigation. However, even you already knew that.

    Also, Epstein died on Fatboy’s watch, not Biden’s.

  • edited January 20

    The entire regime are liars

    Proof that Johnathan Ross was not injured, was no internal bleeding, and did not go to the hospital

    Via the police and hospital own records

    He hung out for 30min after the shooting, wasn’t seen by emergency persons on scene, and went to a federal building after

    On top of being denying emergency services by a civilian physician to the person who WAS shot

  • @audiblevideo said:
    The entire regime are liars

    Proof that Johnathan Ross was not injured, was no internal bleeding, and did not go to the hospital

    Via the police and hospital own records

    He hung out for 30min after the shooting, wasn’t seen by emergency persons on scene, and went to a federal building after

    On top of being denied emergency services by a civilian physician

    I mean, anyone with working eyes knows this. It's only the other side that is accepting the gaslighting from dear leader because apparently they need to be told what to think about everything.

  • @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    The Epstein files were collected under Joe Biden’s administration, not Trump’s. Right? And Epstein died after being taken into custody by Biden’s FBI… Why didn’t Biden order everything released back then? I think if no one can honestly answer that then criticisms of Trump or his DOJ are just partisan cherry picking.

    I don't care who collected them or when. The full truth has to come out. No protection for pedos. Right?

    I know of no one who is "pro pedo." But you didn't answer the question. It's an important one. WHY didn't Joe Biden and his people reveal everything when they had everything in their possession?

  • If this is for real…. nuff said

  • @NeuM said:
    But you didn't answer the question. It's an important one. WHY didn't Joe Biden and his people reveal everything when they had everything in their possession?

    Because it was an an open criminal investigation and they hadn't arrested Ghislaine Maxwell yet.

    You seem to be really concerned about Biden and the files but not so worried about Epstein's best buddy Donald Trump and what the 2 of them got up to when no one was looking.

  • @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    But you didn't answer the question. It's an important one. WHY didn't Joe Biden and his people reveal everything when they had everything in their possession?

    Because it was an an open criminal investigation and they hadn't arrested Ghislaine Maxwell yet.

    You seem to be really concerned about Biden and the files but not so worried about Epstein's best buddy Donald Trump and what the 2 of them got up to when no one was looking.

    If you (or anyone else) had real proof of Trump doing anything illegal, it absolutely would've been leaked to the press. No question.

  • @NeuM said:
    If you (or anyone else) had real proof of Trump doing anything illegal, it absolutely would've been leaked to the press. No question.

    Of course there is a question.

    Until the info is released we don't know what is in it. Until you know, you actually don't know.

    Just deciding that it "probably" would have been leaked is no confirmation of anything except lazyness.

  • edited January 19

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    If you (or anyone else) had real proof of Trump doing anything illegal, it absolutely would've been leaked to the press. No question.

    Of course there is a question.

    Until the info is released we don't know what is in it. Until you know, you actually don't know.

    Just deciding that it "probably" would have been leaked is no confirmation of anything except lazyness.

    They leaked his taxes, they tried to frame him for "stealing classified documents" with the FBI, he was left exposed to the attempts of several assassins, they illegally tapped the phones of his lawyers, they openly lied and defamed him in coordination with the media... Yes, they absolutely would've leaked anything they had on him to the press. There is no question about this.

  • @espiegel123 said:
    If this is for real…. nuff said

    ![](https://forum.loopypro.com/u>; @espiegel123 said:
    If this is for real…. nuff said

    The Rapist Mentality

  • edited January 19

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    If you (or anyone else) had real proof of Trump doing anything illegal, it absolutely would've been leaked to the press. No question.

    Of course there is a question.

    Until the info is released we don't know what is in it. Until you know, you actually don't know.

    Just deciding that it "probably" would have been leaked is no confirmation of anything except lazyness.

    Right? If they had nothing to hide they wouldn’t have spent $851,344 on overtime pay for the FBI to redact the files:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-11-25/epstein-files-new-fbi-emails-detail-review-special-redaction-project

    The Epstein Files transparency act passed by congress and signed by Trumpy The Clown in late 2025 mandated that the DoJ release all unclassified files by dec 19, 2025. The DoJ is breaking the law and the buck stops with Trumpy the clown as our “unitary” executive.

    It's funny how they claim the President is an all-powerful CEO when he's firing people he dislikes, but suddenly he’s a helpless bystander when the FBI (run by his hand-picked people) ignores a Congressional mandate. Trumpy has been quick to fire people who don’t bow down to Dear Leader, but he hasn’t said a peep against Pamela Bondi or Kash Patel.

    Who is the Trumpy clown car of an administration trying to protect? Bill Clinton? lol

    That’s why it’s a waste of time to go back and forth with someone who isn’t arguing in good faith. They’re not even in the same reality as everyone else, and the cognitive dissonance is so strong that they will deny basic facts in order to avoid seeing the obvious.

    The only thing that changes most of these people’s minds is them or someone they care about being directly hit by something this administration does. This is the cult of “I gots mine so fuck you”. The realization that they’re being fucked over without the courtesy of Vaseline or even a reacharound usually manifests itself in demented direct appeals to Trump in social media as if he was reading their feed, or in complaints that “this isn’t what I voted for” (yes they did! But they thought only OTHER people would get the rim job!)

  • Just stop engaging with you-know-who. There's no getting through to someone who is part of a cult.

    Also, that letter that Trump sent to Norway is completely unhinged and we'll definitely be starting multiple wars with NATO this year before the midterms. Enjoy being part of the Axis and not the Allies.

  • @maxxpower18 said:
    Just stop engaging with you-know-who. There's no getting through to someone who is part of a cult.

    Also, that letter that Trump sent to Norway is completely unhinged and we'll definitely be starting multiple wars with NATO this year before the midterms. Enjoy being part of the Axis and not the Allies.

    100% it sucks.

    I already have the passport’s ready to get my family out of dodge. I just hope I can time it right.

  • edited January 19

    @JeffChasteen yes - rapist mentality

    Trump is and has always been an abuser. He abuses the law. He abused his wife. He abused contractors. He abused the tax and insurance system. He abuses…

    What do I mean by abuse. Someone tells him “no” and he doubles down with entreaties, threats, and eventually violence.

    This pattern repeated over and over along with his “mental decline” (read as dementia) leads me to believe that he will attempt to “unalive us all” to either stay in power, shore up his ego, deny reality, or just out of spite.

    Stephen miller isn’t helping, only goading him, because miller has “issues” of his own as he can be seen as the personification of the state of Israel’s current policy of “purification” aka genocide.

    Also people with dementia, as the disease progresses, become increasingly irrational and violent. Couple that with the paramilitary Gestapo ice and a DOJ that refuses the law when it applies to any who support Trump or his agenda but seeks maximal interference and punishment for ANYBODY else and you WILL have Minnesota shootings happen over and over and over until the entire regime is neutered or removed.

  • @AlexY said:

    @maxxpower18 said:
    Just stop engaging with you-know-who. There's no getting through to someone who is part of a cult.

    Also, that letter that Trump sent to Norway is completely unhinged and we'll definitely be starting multiple wars with NATO this year before the midterms. Enjoy being part of the Axis and not the Allies.

    100% it sucks.

    I already have the passport’s ready to get my family out of dodge. I just hope I can time it right.

    According to an attempted policy change only Rubio can approve who gets to leave.

    It got pulled, but they will try more and similar shit over and over because the entire regime is modeled after the abuser in chief.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/16/brian-mast-marco-rubio-revoke-passport-measure

  • @NeuM said:

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    The Epstein files were collected under Joe Biden’s administration, not Trump’s. Right? And Epstein died after being taken into custody by Biden’s FBI… Why didn’t Biden order everything released back then? I think if no one can honestly answer that then criticisms of Trump or his DOJ are just partisan cherry picking.

    I don't care who collected them or when. The full truth has to come out. No protection for pedos. Right?

    I know of no one who is "pro pedo." But you didn't answer the question. It's an important one. WHY didn't Joe Biden and his people reveal everything when they had everything in their possession?

    What about captain underpants?

    https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dershowitz-responds-after-1997-statutory-rape-is-an-outdated-concept-op-ed-resurfaces/

    Regarding Dershowitz and underpants
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Yyu9l-Pk_o4

    https://abovethelaw.com/2025/07/alan-dershowitz-reprises-role-as-captain-underpants/

  • @espiegel123 said:
    If this is for real…. nuff said

    The Trump-sympathetic Washington Post is treating this as legit. The GOP not denouncing it tells us that we are in for a rough ride.

    So much of the U.S. financial success and standing in the world was based on its alliances and relative stability and perception that it lives up to its agreements regardless of who is president. Whether there is a war over Greenland or not, that such an action is conceivable is something that will make the U.S. be considered an unreliable partner for decades even if a more reasonable government returns.

    The knock-on effects of this may take years to be fully clear.

  • @espiegel123

    The knock-on effects of this may take years to be fully clear.

    Decades

  • edited January 19

    @NeuM said:
    They leaked his taxes, they tried to frame him for "stealing classified documents" with the FBI, he was left exposed to the attempts of several assassins, they illegally tapped the phones of his lawyers, they openly lied and defamed him in coordination with the media... Yes, they absolutely would've leaked anything they had on him to the press. There is no question about this.

    Someone gives you a box and until you open the box you don't know exactly what is inside the box. Right?

    "They said there was a potato inside" and "they have a history of giving people boxes of potatoes" and "They know I like potatos and they are kind". BUT until you open it you don't know what is inside. Right?

  • @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    They leaked his taxes, they tried to frame him for "stealing classified documents" with the FBI, he was left exposed to the attempts of several assassins, they illegally tapped the phones of his lawyers, they openly lied and defamed him in coordination with the media... Yes, they absolutely would've leaked anything they had on him to the press. There is no question about this.

    Someone gives you a box and until you open the box you don't know exactly what is inside the box. Right?

    "They said there was a potato inside" and "they have a history of giving people boxes of potatoes" and "They know I like potatos and they are kind". BUT until you open it you don't know what is inside. Right?

    Whatever is the implication here is not clear. Feel free to spell out what you intended to say.

Sign In or Register to comment.