Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Trump is a DICTATOR. Period.

1…457910…16

Comments

  • SimonSimon
    edited January 20

    @NeuM said:

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    They leaked his taxes, they tried to frame him for "stealing classified documents" with the FBI, he was left exposed to the attempts of several assassins, they illegally tapped the phones of his lawyers, they openly lied and defamed him in coordination with the media... Yes, they absolutely would've leaked anything they had on him to the press. There is no question about this.

    Someone gives you a box and until you open the box you don't know exactly what is inside the box. Right?

    "They said there was a potato inside" and "they have a history of giving people boxes of potatoes" and "They know I like potatos and they are kind". BUT until you open it you don't know what is inside. Right?

    Whatever is the implication here is not clear. Feel free to spell out what you intended to say.

    No hidden impication. Maybe a bad example. I think I was thinking of Shrdinger's Cat as an example and I changed the cat to a potato.

    The point is: until you open the box you don't know what is inside. It doesn't matter what other things happened in the past, until you open the box to see what is inside you can't be sure of what is there. Until you actually open the box there is always a question of what might be inside.

  • Yadrichik_ChayaYadrichik_Chaya

    @JeffChasteen said:

    ✌️😅

  • NeuMNeuM

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:

    @Simon said:

    @NeuM said:
    They leaked his taxes, they tried to frame him for "stealing classified documents" with the FBI, he was left exposed to the attempts of several assassins, they illegally tapped the phones of his lawyers, they openly lied and defamed him in coordination with the media... Yes, they absolutely would've leaked anything they had on him to the press. There is no question about this.

    Someone gives you a box and until you open the box you don't know exactly what is inside the box. Right?

    "They said there was a potato inside" and "they have a history of giving people boxes of potatoes" and "They know I like potatos and they are kind". BUT until you open it you don't know what is inside. Right?

    Whatever is the implication here is not clear. Feel free to spell out what you intended to say.

    No hidden impication. Maybe a bad example. I think I was thinking of Shrdinger's Cat as an example and I changed the cat to a potato.

    The point is: until you open the box you don't know what is inside. It doesn't matter what other things happened in the past, until you open the box to see what is inside you can't be sure of what is there. Until you actually open the box there is always a question of what might be inside.

    I know about Schrödinger's cat from physics... but I still don't understand the connection to prior comments. I'm willing to discuss what you are saying, but I still don't see an example or point being made yet. Maybe you can clarify the point more.

  • GavinskiGavinski

  • NeuMNeuM

    That doesn't answer anything. Thanks.

  • AlexYAlexY

    https://leavingmaga.org/

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

  • KatinkeraKatinkera

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that? I would, too. Even Jimmy Carter said that he had lust in his heart. I believe that he was a decent and honorable man. I voted for him. Bill Clinton liked young girls, too. I voted for him.

    This comment makes me barf in circles.
    Is it so hard to understand that this is abuse? Not just for underage Girls (which is just Pedo and minimizing this is disgusting) but any constellation with an abuse of power.

    Do any of you guys think young women would do ANYTHING with way older guys if they wouldn’t be lured/lied to/forced/emotionally manipulated or their life would depend on it financially?

    And no, it’s not a kink 🤮

    This mindset is why there is a "male loneliness epidemic“.
    Your mom would probably be ashamed you’re thinking and feeling that way.

  • AlexYAlexY

    Looking at the world stage now, I know this speech at Davos is just a reflection of our reality today with regards with how the U.S. is treating its allies.

    The U.S. is done as a leading beacon (if we ever were), especially with our heel turn both internationally and domestically (Greenland, Venezuela, lawlessness abroad and domestically) Even though us being the good guys was always a fiction (more like the lesser evil, if that).

    This is probably for the best when half our country insists on breaking bad:

  • AlexYAlexY

    Congratulations MAGA #MAGA #ICE #racism #2ndclasscitizenship

    https://youtube.com/shorts/kFM5Bi6vJF8

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTve89pEfhK/

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

  • maxxpower18maxxpower18

    @Katinkera said:

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that? I would, too. Even Jimmy Carter said that he had lust in his heart. I believe that he was a decent and honorable man. I voted for him. Bill Clinton liked young girls, too. I voted for him.

    This comment makes me barf in circles.
    Is it so hard to understand that this is abuse? Not just for underage Girls (which is just Pedo and minimizing this is disgusting) but any constellation with an abuse of power.

    Do any of you guys think young women would do ANYTHING with way older guys if they wouldn’t be lured/lied to/forced/emotionally manipulated or their life would depend on it financially?

    And no, it’s not a kink 🤮

    This mindset is why there is a "male loneliness epidemic“.
    Your mom would probably be ashamed you’re thinking and feeling that way.

    Funny how he hasn't come back in here.

  • PaulieworldPaulieworld

    I'm baaaaack...

    @Katinkera @maxxpower18
    LOL!
    Okay. Focus like a laser beam. My exact words were "young girls".
    Clinton's intern was 21, he was 49 and married. Over twice her age. That is a young girl.

    My comment was a deliberate and disgusting parody of the prevailing party thinking at the time.

    "Yeah, he a bum... but he's my bum".
    "The economy is great, I'm making money, why should I care?" (You edited that part out)
    "Separate his professional behavior from his private behavior".
    The term for that was "compartmentalize".
    By your definition, Clinton was a "p-word".
    You elected him twice.

    Fast forward to 2020. Several hundred thousand "unaccompanied minors" have since crossed the border illegally.
    That is just a nicer way of saying "missing children".
    The party in power had the opportunity, and the VOTES, to change immigration laws for 4 years.
    Yet, here we are.

    Spare me your self-righteous indignation.

    Barfing in circles? I would like to see that.
    I think a better word is "cringe".
    Your comment made me do that.
    I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate.

    In America you have the right to free speech. So do I.

    I have a bet regarding who will post their next "free speech".
    I don't pay much attention. I just consider the source.

  • Yadrichik_ChayaYadrichik_Chaya

    @JeffChasteen said:

    LOL! 🤣 You beat me to it, I found the same pic on Facebook and was just about to upload it here! ✌️😂

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen
    edited January 21

    For Paulie:

    [(https://forum.loopypro.com/uploads/editor/zx/168zg42i2yaz.jpeg "")

  • AlexYAlexY

    I hope we're all in agreement, though, that what was happening around Epstein with minors is wrong as opposed to pulling a Megyn Kelly blooper.

    https://www.npr.org/2025/11/18/nx-s1-5612509/what-does-15-look-like-teens-and-former-child-actors-weigh-in-online-after-megyn-kelly-comments

  • Yadrichik_ChayaYadrichik_Chaya
    edited January 21
      1. You were the one making excuses for powerful men regarding underage girls…
      1. You wrote that you yourself voted for these men and how the economy was pretty good and that you were making good money and had no complaints…
      1. This was your response that also ended with: “The Epstein files are just a distraction. Wake up, dummy!”

    @Paulieworld said:
    Rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls. What’s so hard to understand about that? I would, too. Even Jimmy Carter said that he had lust in his heart. I believe that he was a decent and honorable man. I voted for him. Bill Clinton liked young girls, too. I voted for him. When he was president, the economy was pretty good. I was making good money and had no complaints. Whatever he did behind the Oval Office didn’t affect my paycheck. The Epstein files are just a distraction. Wake up, dummy!

    • Yet when people now called you out regarding how disturbing your views are, you instead made up the following lie:

    @Paulieworld said:

    My comment was a deliberate and disgusting parody of the prevailing party thinking at the time.

    "Yeah, he a bum... but he's my bum".
    "The economy is great, I'm making money, why should I care?" (You edited that part out)
    "Separate his professional behavior from his private behavior".
    The term for that was "compartmentalize".
    By your definition, Clinton was a "p-word".
    You elected him twice.

    “a deliberate and disgusting parody of the prevailing party thinking at the time”?

    • There is not a single hint regarding what you wrote being parody, at all.

    • You even ended it with “The Epstein files are just a distraction. Wake up, dummy!” -
      What is this then regarding the Epstein files, your style of self-deprecating humor maybe? 🤤

    In the post that you now claim is “deliberate parody” what is actually true and not parody?

    • Just answer with a simple Yes or No:

    Did you vote for Jimmy Carter?
    Was Jimmy Carter “a decent and honorable man”?
    Did you vote for Bill Clinton?
    Were you “making good money” during Bill Clinton’s presidency?
    Was the “economy pretty good” during Bill Clinton’s presidency?
    Are the Epstein files “just a distraction”?
    Do “rich men in positions of power like to bang young girls”?

  • PaulieworldPaulieworld

    @Yadrichik_Chaya

    I received quite a few comments about the things I posted here and the other thread.
    Here are a few...

    • It would really be helpful and a gesture of good faith to have your ideas out in the open, because otherwise this is starting to resemble a game of “gotcha” and “just asking questions “.

    • I also feel like the parameters of this little thought experiment aren't clear.

    • This guy has to be fucking with us right?

    • I can't tell if you're a joke character or not.

    There appears to be at least few people that "get it".
    Next time, if there is one, I will include a Spoiler Alert just for you.

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    Putin’s Catamite is so fucking stupid:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/s/kh4HpDhBFL

  • Yadrichik_ChayaYadrichik_Chaya

    @Paulieworld said:
    @Yadrichik_Chaya

    I received quite a few comments about the things I posted here and the other thread.
    Here are a few...

    • It would really be helpful and a gesture of good faith to have your ideas out in the open, because otherwise this is starting to resemble a game of “gotcha” and “just asking questions “.

    • I also feel like the parameters of this little thought experiment aren't clear.

    • This guy has to be fucking with us right?

    • I can't tell if you're a joke character or not.

    There appears to be at least few people that "get it".
    Next time, if there is one, I will include a Spoiler Alert just for you.

    A very disingenuous reply.

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    From the pedophile fascist himself:

    President Trump who has a resume of authoritarian tendencies, thinks that sometimes “you need a dictator.”

    “We had a good speech, we got great reviews. I can’t believe it, we got good reviews on that speech,” Trump said on Wednesday, speaking of the long-winded, indignant, and incredibly boring address he gave earlier that day at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    “Usually they say ‘he’s a horrible dictator-type person,’ I’m a dictator,” Trump continued. “But sometimes you need a dictator! But they didn’t say that in this case.... It’s all based on common sense, it’s not conservative or liberal, or anything else.”

  • PaulieworldPaulieworld

    @Yadrichik_Chaya said:

    @Paulieworld said:
    @Yadrichik_Chaya

    I received quite a few comments about the things I posted here and the other thread.
    Here are a few...

    • It would really be helpful and a gesture of good faith to have your ideas out in the open, because otherwise this is starting to resemble a game of “gotcha” and “just asking questions “.

    • I also feel like the parameters of this little thought experiment aren't clear.

    • This guy has to be fucking with us right?

    • I can't tell if you're a joke character or not.

    There appears to be at least few people that "get it".
    Next time, if there is one, I will include a Spoiler Alert just for you.

    A very disingenuous reply.

    Sorry about that, chief. I'm just a mean old poopy butt.
    I was going to quit, but this just keeps getting better and better!

  • PaulieworldPaulieworld

    @JeffChasteen said:
    For Paulie:

    [(https://forum.loopypro.com/uploads/editor/zx/168zg42i2yaz.jpeg "")

    Thanks, man. I dig it!

  • SimonSimon

    @Paulieworld said:
    Clinton's intern was 21, he was 49 and married. Over twice her age. That is a young girl.

    Really?

    21 is old enough to drive a car, join the military, or vote. That's a woman.

    As Bill said... "I did not have sex with that woman".

  • espiegel123espiegel123

    Trump actually called himself a dictator today and said “sometimes you need a good dictator.”

    He is surrounded by people that admire and look to Curtis Yarvin for their political philosophy. Look him up. He is openly anti-democracy and has become surprisingly open about his admiration for Hitler. It should be quite terrifying that influential billionaires and people in government think of the guy as anything but a crank.

    If anyone thinks Trump aspires to be anything other than an authoritarian leader, they are deluding themselves.

    It is no secret. For years, he has openly spoken of his admiration for Putin, Orban and any number of dictators— and the GOP has gone along with him.

  • espiegel123espiegel123

  • PaulieworldPaulieworld

    @Simon said:

    @Paulieworld said:
    Clinton's intern was 21, he was 49 and married. Over twice her age. That is a young girl.

    Really?

    21 is old enough to drive a car, join the military, or vote. That's a woman.

    As Bill said... "I did not have sex with that woman".

    He was 28 years old when she was born.
    To your credit, you understand the definition of a woman.
    Thanks for sharing.

  • KatinkeraKatinkera

    @Paulieworld said:
    I'm baaaaack...

    @Katinkera @maxxpower18
    LOL!
    Okay. Focus like a laser beam. My exact words were "young girls".
    Clinton's intern was 21, he was 49 and married. Over twice her age. That is a young girl.

    No. That’s a young woman.
    It still doesn’t change the mechanics of power abuse.

    My comment was a deliberate and disgusting parody of the prevailing party thinking at the time.

    "Yeah, he a bum... but he's my bum".
    "The economy is great, I'm making money, why should I care?" (You edited that part out)
    "Separate his professional behavior from his private behavior".
    The term for that was "compartmentalize".
    By your definition, Clinton was a "p-word".
    You elected him twice.

    Fast forward to 2020. Several hundred thousand "unaccompanied minors" have since crossed the border illegally.
    That is just a nicer way of saying "missing children".
    The party in power had the opportunity, and the VOTES, to change immigration laws for 4 years.
    Yet, here we are.

    Spare me your self-righteous indignation.

    Barfing in circles? I would like to see that.
    I think a better word is "cringe".
    Your comment made me do that.
    I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate.

    Nope, it’s a roundhouse barf.
    Cringe would mean I feel discomfort.
    I feel disgust.
    Btw English isn’t my native language. I speak 3, how about you?

    You haven’t told me shit. Also I am not American.

    In America you have the right to free speech. So do I.

    I have a bet regarding who will post their next "free speech".
    I don't pay much attention. I just consider the source.

    As I don’t want to waste any more energy…
    I will just make it short. On behalf of womenkind, it’s still a massive "Ewwww", probably for most of us ;) byebye

  • maxxpower18maxxpower18

    As I don’t want to waste any more energy…
    I will just make it short. On behalf of womenkind, it’s still a massive "Ewwww", probably for most of us ;) byebye

    Best to not waste our energy. The only thing he's right about is the Dems not doing anything about ICE during Biden's term. He still kept all of the inhumane practices in ICE detention facilities. I'm a far left progressive so unfortunately the Democrats are not my party either, they are completely owned by the bourgeoisie.

Sign In or Register to comment.