Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Your favorite FX in iOS

2

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited May 2017

    Crystalline is a good one. I like it!
    I mostly layer iOS reverbs. My favorite combo so far is Audio Reverb goes into AUFX:Space....but yeah i miss that what i would call "immersive cinematic like" space. It is not impossible to get close to it but it´s so easy with 1-2 plug-ins and it´s hard to avoid very muddy sound and details get lost fast if the algorithms are not so good.
    I must say i´m a reverb addict (and delay with special FX) so i judge that very harsh.
    AUM is a good recommendation. So i could use it also to use FX in parallel mode not only serial per lane like in Audiobus?
    Something like Patch Work for iOS?

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen
    edited May 2017

    Three way tie between Moebius, ApeFilter, and AltiSpace

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @syrupcore said:
    Considering the cinebient nature of your tracks, I'd considering spending some time experimenting with stacking and routing effects. For me, Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space and I'm generally in galaxy exploration mode. ;)

    Crystalline is one of those effects that sounds so good that it's easy to forget that you can use it subtly. Samvada is another. Try this in AUM or a DAW:

    Source synth with two sends:
    1) Crystalline. Turn it up until you can hear it and then dial it back a tiny bit.
    2) Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space (or any delay+reverb you like)
    1a) send the crystalline track into send 2.

    Also think that Holderness' Caramel app is a little under appreciated. Perfect for adding dirt. Overdrive is usually used as an insert but it can be used on a send with AUM. It can also be used as an insert on the send channel itself to dirty up an other wise clean delay+reverb... (while leaving the original source channel clean).

    Another experiment: put 2-4 of your favorite reverbs on separate tracks in AUM. Create sends to these and then experiment with panning, filtering and sending the reverbs into each other. Particularly with multiple reverbs going, you can make great use of pre-delay to make things ginormous. You can also send reverbs into a delay and then use a master reverb after the delay to smooth it all out.

    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Solid advice & inspiration - thank you

  • JRSIVJRSIV

    If Auria wasn't my go to DAW I can see myself rolling my eyes when the greatness of the FabFilter plugs are mentioned so much. I hope the cynical 'other me' however would actually try the FabFilter plug ins before putting something else above them.

    The FabFilter plugs are peerless. They have the same algorithm & technology that the desktop has, cost is the only difference. They are so good that even if you don't like Auria's interface it's worth buying Auria Pro, buying the FF plugs, importing audio from your chosen DAW, printing the FF effect and then exporting it back out to your DAW. Pain in the ass yes, but totally reasonable upon hearing these FF effects.

    The AUFX collection is quite good and the DDMF Envelope reverb is really nice as well. The AltiSpace Convolution Reverb is awesome IF you use quality impulse responses. Using a good Lexicon reverb IR can be eerily close to using the hardware unit.

    There are some turds but iOS producers have tons of great IAA, AB & more and more AU effects to chose from.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @syrupcore said:
    Considering the cinebient nature of your tracks, I'd considering spending some time experimenting with stacking and routing effects. For me, Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space and I'm generally in galaxy exploration mode. ;)

    Crystalline is one of those effects that sounds so good that it's easy to forget that you can use it subtly. Samvada is another. Try this in AUM or a DAW:

    Source synth with two sends:
    1) Crystalline. Turn it up until you can hear it and then dial it back a tiny bit.
    2) Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space (or any delay+reverb you like)
    1a) send the crystalline track into send 2.

    Funnily enough I've never run reverb and dub together- I'll try this tonight, thanks captain.

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    I wonder how long Fabfilter will remain exclusive to Auria? They could be missing a big chunk of the market.

  • theconnactictheconnactic

    @gusgranite said:
    I wonder how long Fabfilter will remain exclusive to Auria? They could be missing a big chunk of the market.

    You can always buy the very low cost Auria LE just to be able to use the FabFilter FX plug-ins.

  • theconnactictheconnactic

    But obviously, great would be Auria as universal app. A large chunk of the iOS music market uses the iPhone mainly/only.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited May 2017

    @gusgranite said:
    I wonder how long Fabfilter will remain exclusive to Auria? They could be missing a big chunk of the market.

    I posted this query on the FabFilter website forum, along with a few other people, a couple of months ago, making that exact argument. They did reply:
    "We don't have an exclusive deal for Auria; it's just that developing stand-alone plug-ins for iOS is a significant amount of work so we're still undecided on that. We have a lot of work to do on other stuff as well! :-)"

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    @mireko_2 said:
    Wow by sugarbytes is really great, it is also very deep with so many ways to modulate all the parameters (lfo, env follower etc).
    I really recommend watching this quick video to get a sense of it depth, plus it sounds fantastic.

    I LOVE the distortions in WOW. My favs in iOS by far. I use it just for distortion most of the time!

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited May 2017

    @MonzoPro said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Considering the cinebient nature of your tracks, I'd considering spending some time experimenting with stacking and routing effects. For me, Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space and I'm generally in galaxy exploration mode. ;)

    Crystalline is one of those effects that sounds so good that it's easy to forget that you can use it subtly. Samvada is another. Try this in AUM or a DAW:

    Source synth with two sends:
    1) Crystalline. Turn it up until you can hear it and then dial it back a tiny bit.
    2) Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space (or any delay+reverb you like)
    1a) send the crystalline track into send 2.

    Funnily enough I've never run reverb and dub together- I'll try this tonight, thanks captain.

    Hmm, mega fail. All lovely, with Nave (triggered by ChordFlow) running through dub and reverb via AUM, but trying to add VCS3 ended up in the dreaded drone/fail noise, and no matter what order I loaded/booted them up in, I got a horrible noise as a result.

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    @syrupcore said:
    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Could do that with a bus send and the stereo balance node, I believe.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @MonzoPro said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Considering the cinebient nature of your tracks, I'd considering spending some time experimenting with stacking and routing effects. For me, Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space and I'm generally in galaxy exploration mode. ;)

    Crystalline is one of those effects that sounds so good that it's easy to forget that you can use it subtly. Samvada is another. Try this in AUM or a DAW:

    Source synth with two sends:
    1) Crystalline. Turn it up until you can hear it and then dial it back a tiny bit.
    2) Aufx: Dub -> Aufx: Space (or any delay+reverb you like)
    1a) send the crystalline track into send 2.

    Funnily enough I've never run reverb and dub together- I'll try this tonight, thanks captain.

    Hmm, mega fail. All lovely, with Nave (triggered by ChordFlow) running through dub and reverb via AUM, but trying to add VCS3 ended up in the dreaded drone/fail noise, and no matter what order I loaded/booted them up in, I got a horrible noise as a result.

    Update: took me half an hour to suss out, but loading iVCS3 into AUM first cured the fail.

  • WillWill

    @OscarSouth said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Could do that with a bus send and the stereo balance node, I believe.

    Ah, of course. Thanks!

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    @syrupcore said:

    @OscarSouth said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Could do that with a bus send and the stereo balance node, I believe.

    Ah, of course. Thanks!

    I want to hear the results!!

  • WillWill

    @OscarSouth said:

    @syrupcore said:

    @OscarSouth said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Could do that with a bus send and the stereo balance node, I believe.

    Ah, of course. Thanks!

    I want to hear the results!!

    Not sure I own enough reverb apps but I'll investigate.

  • philowerxphilowerx

    frekvens by Erik Sigth
    https://appsto.re/us/i6xu_.i

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    Since we're talking about reverbs I'll just add that Blamsoft's Zero Reverb may be my favourite sounding Reverb on the system.

    AUFX Space has much more nuance and I'd usually use that for vocals, but Zero Reverb sounds phenomenally good on almost anything.

  • TheVimFuegoTheVimFuego

    Another vote for the filters that are fab (modulation central).

    Turnado is fun too.

    Apesoft/Amazing Noises stuff.

  • Gaia.TreeGaia.Tree

    @OscarSouth said:
    Since we're talking about reverbs I'll just add that Blamsoft's Zero Reverb may be my favourite sounding Reverb on the system.

    AUFX Space has much more nuance and I'd usually use that for vocals, but Zero Reverb sounds phenomenally good on almost anything.

    I really dig the blamsoft reverb. Do u also have any of the other blamsoft fx? I am considering the filter and the chorus

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    @Gaia.Tree said:

    @OscarSouth said:
    Since we're talking about reverbs I'll just add that Blamsoft's Zero Reverb may be my favourite sounding Reverb on the system.

    AUFX Space has much more nuance and I'd usually use that for vocals, but Zero Reverb sounds phenomenally good on almost anything.

    I really dig the blamsoft reverb. Do u also have any of the other blamsoft fx? I am considering the filter and the chorus

    I highly recommend the F-16 Filter.
    I prefer it to...um...um...Filtatron.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited May 2017
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    @Gaia.Tree said:

    @OscarSouth said:
    Since we're talking about reverbs I'll just add that Blamsoft's Zero Reverb may be my favourite sounding Reverb on the system.

    AUFX Space has much more nuance and I'd usually use that for vocals, but Zero Reverb sounds phenomenally good on almost anything.

    I really dig the blamsoft reverb. Do u also have any of the other blamsoft fx? I am considering the filter and the chorus

    I have all of them. All amazing

  • j_liljedahlj_liljedahl

    @OscarSouth said:

    @syrupcore said:
    Currently wondering: can you split the L/R on a channel in AUM and send them to different destinations? Specifically wondering about using something like Holderness' Johnny to create a full wet auto-pan and then sending each of those to different reverb chains, panned out and then blended via a final reverb.

    Could do that with a bus send and the stereo balance node, I believe.

    Sure. Make your instrument/source channel output to a bus. Create two other channels that receives on this bus. On each of these two, add a "Stereo to Mono" node and select 100% L on one and 100% R on the other.

    Now add whatever insert effects or sends you want on these two channels..

  • j_liljedahlj_liljedahl

    @Cib said:
    AUM is a good recommendation. So i could use it also to use FX in parallel mode not only serial per lane like in Audiobus?

    Yes, any combination is possible in AUM.

  • RUST( i )KRUST( i )K

    @gusgranite said:
    Without starting an objective/subjective thread derailment, is there any agreement on measuring the 'quality' of an effect?

    No

    Completely subjective unless speaking on specific app interactions I would think.

    My opinion changes day to day on effects anyway!

    Depends on the level of treble fatigue I have at the moment as well.

  • ThomasThomas

    I have to admit- Turnado kind of "hollowed-out" whatever I put thru it.

  • supadomsupadom

    @RustiK said:

    @gusgranite said:
    Without starting an objective/subjective thread derailment, is there any agreement on measuring the 'quality' of an effect?

    No

    Completely subjective unless speaking on specific app interactions I would think.

    My opinion changes day to day on effects anyway!

    Depends on the level of treble fatigue I have at the moment as well.

    It's amazing how a mix usually improves by thinning out the treble.

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    @Thomas said:
    I have to admit- Turnado kind of "hollowed-out" whatever I put thru it.

    It's fantastic as an effects send though, to build up some mind blowing background textures.

  • WillWill

    @OscarSouth said:

    @Thomas said:
    I have to admit- Turnado kind of "hollowed-out" whatever I put thru it.

    It's fantastic as an effects send though, to build up some mind blowing background textures.

    It is but none of its individual effects are really stand out. The point is to use the effects en masse and modulate stuff. CPUs being what they are, it makes sense to me that they'd over optimize the individual algorithms so that you can run 8 at once with modulation and user interaction changing params smoothly.

Sign In or Register to comment.