Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Is Samplr dead?

1246

Comments

  • edited August 2016

    I'd like them both and have spoken with him about it... panning is on the way...
    but if I had to choose one or the other I'd go with #2, and just mute tracks for export.

  • edited August 2016

    I love the idea of apps working well with each other, inter-app-operability but for my particular goto workflow on iOS it's imperative that the apps have a complete workflow within themselves when it comes to apps like sampler or beat machines. Having to go outside of any app to do things like basic panning is a workflow killer. I'm not to sure he won't implement both.

  • Of course, I'd like 1 + 2 as well. Was more of a "Get to know you/What's your spirit animal?" type question. In reality, I'd probably use in-app panning more often than I would multiple outputs but forced to choose, I'd still probably pick multiple outputs.

  • I think I understand your logic, as that choice would get you both. I just need to be completely immersed in the app I'm using during the process. I hate changing apps.

  • Samplr's UI doesn't currently use long press so adding pan shouldn't be such a big deal.

    I see how multiple outs kill 2 pigeons but I'd definitely use pan more if built in.

    Having said that I'd rather have swing and fx and all slider automation.

  • @supadom said:
    Samplr's UI doesn't currently use long press so adding pan shouldn't be such a big deal.

    I see how multiple outs kill 2 pigeons but I'd definitely use pan more if built in.

    Having said that I'd rather have swing and fx and all slider automation.

    and a sidechain comp

  • Of course, after four pages of ever-particular demands, it is a little disheartening that the dev is too swamped with his day job to come by and give us a ray of hope....

  • @syrupcore said:
    Of course, I'd like 1 + 2 as well. Was more of a "Get to know you/What's your spirit animal?" type question. In reality, I'd probably use in-app panning more often than I would multiple outputs but forced to choose, I'd still probably pick multiple outputs.

    I'd take the outs every time, but that's my Chief of Staff talking. As a candidate who's out front (if you get my convolution) I'd be begging for the pan...would do any good of course. The Chief of Staff slaughtered my spirit animal long ago...

  • I don't think anyone is demanding anything. Just wanting a great app to be ever greater. :) For me, sample trimming alone would quadruple my usage of the app. Mostly to take advantage of the beat based slicing. Just being able to set the start point (like you can with the keyboard mode) from which to slice would work for me.

    Or if the Audioshare integration was automagically round trip without ending up with 4 copies of the sample to manage (OG recording, OG recording in Audioshare, trimmed sample in AS, trimmed sample back in Samplr).

    But as long as we're being wishy, I'll add the ability to turn off the quantizer in the delay and lfo effects so you can sweep around without the jumps.

  • edited August 2016

    me & samplr

  • Just did this one: 2xSamplr and Sector

  • edited August 2016

    @syrupcore said:
    @kobamoto and @JohnnyGoodyear Out of curiosity, if Marco were to show up here and ask you to decide between:

    1. output-per-track but no built in panning
    2. panning-per-track but all tracks summed to a single stereo out


    which would you chose?

    Output per track for sure. If you had that you can pan each part where the hell you want it in your daw of choice anyway. Having that flexibility to eq and add any ios effects to each output track would make the app perfect for me, it is only a hair off perfection as it is

  • @FlightManual said:
    Since Samplr is the greatest app I have ever played with, I currently can't stand the title of this thread.

    When I first got into music 20 years ago, an accordian repairman/cheezy lounge singer/mentor lived next to me. He heard me listening to my techno records next door. I was down to one turntable after moving, so my DJ career was done. He came over and listened. Then he said, "I have a machine that sounds like your brain." Went over to his room and came back with a Roland TR-808. Still in the box, plastic cutout protector on it. He let me play with it for the night. I stayed up all night. When he came back, I showed him what I did, and he sold it to me. For $160. Just because I was so in love. It inspired everything I did.

    Samplr is now the machine that sounds like my brain. It's just so intuitive. If it breaks, I'll be heartbroken. It is worth more than the price of the iPad to me.

    Totally agree, maybe it is not universally intuitive but clicked with me from day one. I will forever have an old ipad with a working version of Samplr in a drawer somewhere just in the unlikely event Samplr does die

  • @RedSkyLullaby said:

    Totally agree, maybe it is not universally intuitive but clicked with me from day one. I will forever have an old ipad with a working version of Samplr in a drawer somewhere just in the unlikely event Samplr does die

    I hope that's your app store review!

  • @syrupcore said:
    @kobamoto and @JohnnyGoodyear Out of curiosity, if Marco were to show up here and ask you to decide between:

    1. output-per-track but no built in panning
    2. panning-per-track but all tracks summed to a single stereo out


    which would you chose?

    option #1 for sure

  • @mireko_2 said:

    @syrupcore said:
    @kobamoto and @JohnnyGoodyear Out of curiosity, if Marco were to show up here and ask you to decide between:

    1. output-per-track but no built in panning
    2. panning-per-track but all tracks summed to a single stereo out


    which would you chose?

    option #1 for sure

    +1

    Other apps come and go.
    Samplr is always close by.

  • @syrupcore said:

    @Telefunky said:
    of course I wouldn't refuse single outs, but when SamplR was released there was noch such thing available - not even Audiobus can do that. Minimix is the first one I noticed to support that feature.

    Lots of apps offer multiple outs by way of exposing multiple ports to AB and IAA. Think that's generally what people are wanting around here vs the ability to address multiple hardware ports. Samplr is ripe for it. Then @kobamoto and @JohnnyGoodyear could at least pan via AUM.

    Amazing story @FlightManual! I already had a lot of respect for accordion repairmen (those things are crazy crazy complicated/delicate) but now I kinda want to be one.

    I have a friend who developed police crime scene photos. Once an accordion repairman died in a bar fight. When Steve was processing the photos he noticed that the victim had a dog mounting a woman tattooed on his bicep. We figured out that when he would have flexed his bicep, the tattoo would become animated. Yes, accordion repairmen are a special breed.

  • @anickt said:

    @mireko_2 said:

    @syrupcore said:
    @kobamoto and @JohnnyGoodyear Out of curiosity, if Marco were to show up here and ask you to decide between:

    1. output-per-track but no built in panning
    2. panning-per-track but all tracks summed to a single stereo out


    which would you chose?

    option #1 for sure

    +1

    Other apps come and go.
    Samplr is always close by.

    +100 option #1

  • edited October 2016

    1 but if I had to choose, i'd rather see midi in/out and link...

  • @Fruitbat1919 said:
    Same here. Sounds strange to many, but an interface can make such a difference to the enjoyment of using an app.

    >

    Yes. The developers of SampleWiz have a history of bright whizzy interfaces. It's put me off a couple of their products, along with the once in a blue moon update strategy.

  • @FlightManual said:
    me & samplr

    Love it!

  • edited October 2016

    @FlightManual said:
    Just did this one: 2xSamplr and Sector

    Very very nice man.

    The most authentic, hazy, chaotic, warm music is made from Samplr. I can put in a sample of my Chihuahua's sneeze and output the lush sounds of a Sunday afternoon drinking mohitos by the pool. Or import a set of strings and output a lopsided glitch-soaked trancendental meditation.

    I came to the party late and had a poor first impression of Samplr but ended up a huge fan with a giant crush. While I'd love link, it's even more authentic and cool in some ways now that it has been ignored for a while. I'm still finding things that are new and interesting even after a hundred and one drinking/experimental music-making sessions. The creator is a god damned hero in my book and should be given his own special holiday for having made iOS music-making a better world.

  • @FlightManual said:
    Just did this one: 2xSamplr and Sector

    Nice work. Not that I'm planning this in the near future but how did you sync both Samplrs to each other? Or are they free running?

  • edited October 2016

    @supadom said:

    @FlightManual said:
    Just did this one: 2xSamplr and Sector

    Nice work. Not that I'm planning this in the near future but how did you sync both Samplrs to each other? Or are they free running?

    Yes Bud... You got it all figured out...

    Very nice...

    Edit... Rather Excellent... Sector and Samplr are powerful 'instruments'..

  • Thanks for all the compliments!

    @supadom said:

    @FlightManual said:
    Just did this one: 2xSamplr and Sector

    Nice work. Not that I'm planning this in the near future but how did you sync both Samplrs to each other? Or are they free running?

    They are free running. Waiting for Link to make it less iffy.

  • I hope Samplr also becomes an AUv3 as well as getting Link. It would have to have some pop up controls or 2 pages, but it's the right shape for an AU with the sample view. Even if it was only a couple of sample slots then you could have multiple instances. Also this would solve the multi out issue and all AU parameters could be midi controlled. Pretty please :)

  • Sorry I haven't read all these post.

    Will samplr EVER get an update

  • @nic_b_nice said:
    Sorry I haven't read all these post.

    Will samplr EVER get an update

    The developer of the Decim8 photo glitching app launched a supposedly improved fancy fifth iteration & it's an unstable mess and many diehard fans have become Appstore Review Assassins in a misguided attempt to save the baby. If something works really well, maybe don't tinker too much!

  • @jooga1972 said:

    @ExAsperis99 said:

    That is fantastically helpful. Thanks. Of course I'd love to see that video, but I'd settle for hearing the result. Do you contribute to SOTM Club?

    So far I've contributed only once to SOTM with this. Made in Samplr.

    Really enjoyed this track

  • @srcer said:

    @FlightManual said:
    me & samplr

    Love it!

    Enjoying this, especially the atomic beer goggles view.

Sign In or Register to comment.