Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
I think the samples are there you just cannot see them, I deleted most of the folders, I kept choir and guitar out of interest, and my install went down from 1.3GB to 922MB
>
Okay, will do. Thanks for that.
>
Witchcraft!
Woot! Sale pricing still on when Ingot home from work. $20 upgrade from Auria. Now I need to spend some time with all the fancy new features. New Poison synth currently distracting me, though.
Congrats! Glad you got to your iPad in time to get the sale pricing.
I keep AUM just for the prospect of loading multiple instances of iSem into Auria since it doesn't support AU-X yet. But I confess I didn't even try to do it. Don't know if it's even possible.
>
Even when it does, I imagine that I'll still be using AUM for recording and mixing. AUM is just so slick and convenient for day to day stuff.
Cubasis and Auria Pro are big boys for big tasks, such as sequencing tracks and adding extra sparkle.
Nope, it's not possible. Yet. But AUx support is coming to Auria Pro. Even then, AUM is much quicker to set up just to jam around and generate ideas. It can always be dumped into the input slot of AudioBus, with AuriaPro in the output for a super-fast transition to the next level if the jam takes shape.
Not sure if i'm misunderstanding something but it is possible to send midi from Auria to several instances of iSem at once through AUM and record the output in Auria
I've done it with other AUs and i just did it with iSem to check and it worked
Have your midi tracks in Auria send to Aum
Have your audio tracks in Auria receive from Aum input 1, 2, 3 etc
In Aum, set output to IAA/AB and select Auria from the list
Finally, in AUM set midi input for iSem to Aum destination and the appropriate midi channel
But maybe you mean something else?
Thanks: I never really tried it, but it's the sole reason I still keep AUM in my iPad.
It's great with Ruismaker as well
Now, if only they'd make iSem boot faster
Oh wow. That works! I learned something new. Thanks!
No, I had misunderstood what you said. I thought you were talking about hosting multiple iSems directly in Auria Pro, but we were both talking about the same thing - hosting multiple in AUM and sending to Auria.
This train has sailed now - back to actual price.
Oh, yeah!
Just a thought regarding AU coming to Auria and the whole business model thing:
I think that it'll generate a lot more direct sales of the app, not just because of people 'holding out' for the addition of AU but because I believe that many people (including myself until recently) have not bought it because we believed that the expensive in app purchases would be necessary for even basic audio work in the app (actually.. I've found that I can do all the mixing I need using only the channel and master strips!).
I think when AU is compatible, people will generally have a much higher level of confidence that Auria will do what they need it to do right out of the box, utilising their already existing sets of AUs.
>
Yes, that makes sense. More than a few peeps, I believe, have also been enticed by the sale price. As I use Cubasis and Logic, I didn't need Auria Pro, and would never have shelled out full price as a gamble.
Now I'm in, I can sit back, play with Auria Pro as and when the fancy takes me, and see what develops. Between it and Cubasis on the iPad, I'm covered.
Precisely. AU will do much to propel Auria as well as independent AU developers.
Is there a way to organize Auria's local file structure? I see the ability to add folders, but not move anything around. My Autia local file area is a mess and could use restructuring.
That should be shouted loudly for anyone who has consisered auria but iap's entered their mind. If you can't make something that sounds good using what comes with auria the problem is not in auria. If those psp plug-ins were not stock in auria but iap's instead then I bet more people would be speaking about how great they are.
The iap's in auria are excellent but buying pro-q, for example, will not suddenly make something sound good if you do not understand the principles of using an eq or have a reason as to why you would need to eq something.
Hmm, not so sure. I struggled with the built in EQ, but pro-q is easier, and much more fun to use. Not essential, but worth the money if you can spare it.
Like the built-in Eqs and love the IAPs (another vote here for ProQ, Micro-warmer, Saturn, Tmeless et. al.), but really looking forward to being able to AU the two recent DDMFs which are lovely...
Does anyone have the Pro-G add-on? I see that it offers ducking, and was curious as to how well this worked.
In fact, all of those quite expensive add-ons could do with new demo videos. The only one I found on YouTube was three years old and in Spanish!
What was the struggle? The interface or the sound? I agree pro-q is easier to use from a visual standpoint, but using ears, they both are great. I love pro-q and do own it (v1) but was still able to get tons out of the channel strip.
However, my statement wasnt saying the iap's aren't great or worth it, they definitely are, just that it is possible to do excellent work with just the stock configuration.
I struggled with the EQ control strip, I found it unintuitive and difficult to get a good sound with.
I know you're not knocking the IAP's, and I'm not knocking the core app. I just personally find it easier to get a better sound with pro-q
Yeah. I previously used Sonar X2/X3 extensively and I found the Channel Strip/Master Strip layout very reminiscent of their 'ProChannels'. I really liked the way they streamlined a project's flow and made it much more like working with a real desk. You'd just get in the habit of making a few appropriate tweaks as you went, with an interface you knew intimately well.
As a counterpoint, one of my earlier DAW experiences was a version of (Cubase maybe 4?) and I hated the way you'd end up spending so much time messing around with plugins on each track to get the mix right.
In the last year or so I've used Studio One, which kind of sits in the middle of those two usability wise. Very nice for editing though. MUCH prefer working in Auria Pro however and I'm glad that the Channel Strip workflow is back in my life. In an ideal world, I wouldn't use any plugins at all.
Of course, visual parametric EQs are nice to work with. I do miss a beefy multiband compressor too, and there are varous features that you can only get at through those IAPs. When they go on sale I'll defo grab a few. However, they'll only get used in extreme cases when 'power tools' are needed as well as for mastering. I much prefer the slick intergration of the Channel Strips and I've gotten on very well with the EQ and compression options available on them.
Just watch the videos for the desktop versions, there's plenty of really good ones on YT. The plugins are identical to the desktop versions.
Me too. I'm not sure why it should make such a difference to what is an aural process, yet I find having a visual EQ that I understand so much easier to get close to where I know I want to be, then close in with my ears to the sweet spot.