Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
And, mr @u0421793 you’re still here on the forum?
If you think everything is shit, why bother to be here at all? Pessimistic son of a bitch!
Dont forget you can import into the audio tracks of gadget....
https://m.soundcloud.com/dave-magoo-1/space-jazz-interlude
https://m.soundcloud.com/dave-magoo-1/bad-hero
https://m.soundcloud.com/dave-magoo-1/drifting
https://m.soundcloud.com/dave-magoo-1/last-light
https://m.soundcloud.com/dave-magoo-1/duskriser
Which ones are Nanostudio, which are Gadget?
Ps: no cheating!
S_nV_x
Gadget has a terrible sequence editor. Its so bad that even after learning it fairly well it just feels like a weird port that wasn't meant for iPhone. Also the lack of preset sharing (emailing, etc) and the huge system hog it is. I love nanostudio. Still my favorite synth/daw combo to date and still sounds fantastic.
I think korg isn't very connected to the rest of the ios community. Can't get ahold of them and tech support just tells you to try restarting your device instead of making a more optimized code.
Gadget glitches out for me at 128 buffer on an iPhone 6s Plus even with 2 instruments. I think thats unacceptable for the quality of sound. Forget running it thru audiobus. What a nightmare.
So sad well be saying goodbye to nanostudio soon (32 bit purge) but hopefully nanostudio 2 will save the day. It's going to be ipad only initially but Matt says it will eventually get an iPhone version as well
Uh ever heard of sunrizer, magellan, thor or model15? They sound fantastic and very warm. Maybe older generation+technology issue?
Um. I'm pretty sure the post you're taking exception to is sarcasm (or more accurately, irony).
I could be wrong though.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8507a/8507ae15e80a308425717b0e8f3e3bd0e0df2169" alt="B) B)"
Beathawk is not a synth. Its a sample based instrument not actually synthesis.
Sorry. Guess that didn't really answer you question tho. I agree about the closed system being very limiting for music work flow. Kinda selfish on the part of developers
Yes, you are wrong about BeatHawk. Almost none of what you've posted is accurate.
Briefly:
For midi it's similar, except you don't need to zip the folder. Just browse to the midi file, two-finger tap, etc.
Basically, you can export any file. Folders have to be zipped first to export them.
Having it being an AUv3 as well "opens" many, many possibilities. And - MIDI Out. So, no I wouldn't call BeatHawk more closed than Gadget by any stretch.
Thank you for doing the needful there Doctor...
Having it being an AUv3 as well "opens" many, many possibilities. And - it has live MIDI Out. So, no I wouldn't call BeatHawk more closed than Gadget by any stretch.
It is quite confusing. Some odd design decisions in there for sure.
Agreed, but boy it's easy to write songs in...
True. I guess it could have been a lot worse. Like long-nose-press to export or something.
Agreed, but boy it's easy to write songs in...
If a developer produced a manual explaining how something is done, and it works well, I'm not complaining.
Have you tried Plinkfest by Catatonia?
Try playin 'em with yer face...
I have to confess that I have played using my tongue a time or two. Okay, actually I was removing doughnut glaze that had gotten on the screen and was causing a disruption in the flow of my fingers on the glass. First world problem...
TapDelay is a really nice app. Having said that, I must agree that against Timeless 2 it's always going to come second.
What a thread!
Feels like the "every new app is so great, amazing and wonderful" times are really overdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f06/30f06e653162aa65c19c3ad03eb7ea63118a0cfa" alt=":D :D"
But, the wonderful with Beathawk 2 is that you can use it in ex Beatmaker 3 as an AUv3 plug...
I really love Beathawk (and Beatmaker 3 of course), but, can’t really see any big disadvantages in Korg Gadget...
We should thanks Korg Inc. for their job to put iOS forward in many ways. Many of the synth is really good, and can easily be used into Beatmaker 3 also...
I've never, ever finished a song with Gadget, or even used blocks of audio from it.
No massive reason why - generally I think it sounds great, but things like transposing sections, or finding I've started the beat halfway through a pattern stop me every time.
Sometimes it's the little things.
Saying that I don't regret buying it, probably, as I've had some fun (unrecorded) jams with it. But very unlikely I'll be buying new Gadgets for it, particularly now BM3's on the scene.
Enthusiasm is great, but the blind enthusiasm we sometimes see, and occasional tribe-like fanaticism, helps nobody. Nowadays I try to hold back, and see what real users make of a new release.
Sometimes, I think an app is not for me, and get persuaded otherwise, but more often I see a demo and end up thinking what's on offer is not better or sufficiently different to what I already own.
Gadget, I don't regret buying, or the IAP's. It's more a case of me discovering how I work best, what works for me, and along the way finding that Gadget for all its invention and expansion is just not a route that suits me.
I deleted Gadget too recently. I'm sure I'll reinstall it again when I get a new ipad with more space. I never found the workflow produced interesting results for me and the closed system perhaps seems right for when it came out. But now is pretty old fashioned. Always interested to see any new updates though.
The Anti-Hype thread? The old king is dead....
Do you find it easier to write songs in beathawk 2 than beatmaker 3?
I'm curious because a lot of people seem to be using beathawk within bm3 yet if beathawk is that intuitive for song arrangement I'm wondering why people don't use beathawk as the 'daw' instead of bm3?
B> @triton100 said:
In terms of sampling/audio editing, there simply is no comparison between the two... people probably use Bheathawk in BM3 because a) they can, its AU and b) it's got good sampled content, while BM3 needs to continue to populate their sound store.