Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Apple confirms it slows down older iPhones via iOS, what about iPads?

13

Comments

  • @Looping_Loddar said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @Looping_Loddar said:

    @StudioES said:
    https://www.macrumors.com/2017/12/20/apple-addresses-iphone-throttling-degraded-battery/
    Apple says this feature has been implemented for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, SE, and, as of iOS 11.2, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus. It will be implemented in future iPhones going forward, too.

    Wow, it's a "feature"! Hopefully not iPads next!

    You may remember the exchange program for iPhone 6s last year. Exchange programs like this are very expensive for Apple. If i were Apple i may have the great idea to do some CPU throttling in case of a too fast degeneration of the iPhone battery.

    Just saying.

    Maybe car manufacturers could slow your vehicle down, to stop your tyres from being worn.

    Maybe the other way round: If your tyres are very worn, they slow down your cars for safety reasons.

    To avoid bloated batteries it is (!) a quite good idea to do some CPU throttling in case of a battery with 80 percent remaining capacity.

    As far as i know the degeneration speeds up when your battery is below 80 percent capacity, and gets very, very fast when your battery is below 40 percent capacity. Additionally the battery life improves when the CPU gets throttled.

    For iPhones having batteries below 80 percent this could be an important issue.

    (oh, and i am quite sure you dont want to see your home burning because of an iPhone)

    I don't know the reasons of Apple. But maybe these are aspects that count for them.

    Or they could ensure their iOS doesn’t hammer their devices, and/or batteries are of a higher quality that they last longer than 500 charges.

    My line in the sand is up to about £250 per year for a device. I can’t afford more, so it means I can’t go over £500 for a device if it’s only good for two years.

    I’m guessing with the public tightening belts due to less money to spend either Aple drop the price, fix their products, or lose sales.

  • @Looping_Loddar said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @Looping_Loddar said:

    @StudioES said:
    https://www.macrumors.com/2017/12/20/apple-addresses-iphone-throttling-degraded-battery/
    Apple says this feature has been implemented for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, SE, and, as of iOS 11.2, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus. It will be implemented in future iPhones going forward, too.

    Wow, it's a "feature"! Hopefully not iPads next!

    You may remember the exchange program for iPhone 6s last year. Exchange programs like this are very expensive for Apple. If i were Apple i may have the great idea to do some CPU throttling in case of a too fast degeneration of the iPhone battery.

    Just saying.

    Maybe car manufacturers could slow your vehicle down, to stop your tyres from being worn.

    Maybe the other way round: If your tyres are very worn, they slow down your cars for safety reasons.

    To avoid bloated batteries it is (!) a quite good idea to do some CPU throttling in case of a battery with 80 percent remaining capacity.

    As far as i know the degeneration speeds up when your battery is below 80 percent capacity, and gets very, very fast when your battery is below 40 percent capacity. Additionally the battery life improves when the CPU gets throttled.

    For iPhones having batteries below 80 percent this could be an important issue.

    (oh, and i am quite sure you dont want to see your home burning because of an iPhone)

    I don't know the reasons of Apple. But maybe these are aspects that count for them.

    Dude, it doesn't work like this. How come this isn't the problem for Android phones? Apple can code this in a different way, but what you are missing here is their main concern: selling new products. And doing it this way is unethical, in my opinion.

  • @RUST( i )K said:
    Breaking News

    Apple fucks customer with no kiss.

    Customers ask are you finished yet.

    Well, business as usual. What can we do? The market is almost monopolised.

  • Another disturbing fact is the silence from inside Apple, no one dared to speak out about this, that just hints at the work ethic that must be in place at Apple. Sad and scary.

  • @realdavidai said:
    I guess no one remembers the massive shutdown bug that was getting out of control before they addressed it with the update: https://www.google.com/amp/www.zdnet.com/google-amp/article/iphone-6-6s-sudden-shutdown-weve-almost-fully-cured-issue-with-ios-10-2-1-says-apple/

    Yes, I remember it - it was a massive problem on my wife's phone, in particular. It would shut down routinely at about 33%, or sometimes even earlier. It was a problem that THEY created with a firmware update, and then designed a workaround for with another firmware update.

    Phones that are only 8-15 months old shouldn't shut themselves off automatically. If the "best" solution to that problem is to put in a firmware timebomb that renders devices increasingly useless before they turn 2 years old, then they need to go back to the drawing board. But they definitely don't get to hide behind a "public safety" argument for slowing down your phone. If I could go back to iOS10 or whatever version on my 6s that doesn't slow itself down to oblivion, I would do that yesterday. Apple doesn't allow me to do that, even though I have a "dated" device. I think it's fair to ask why.

  • @zhoe said:

    @StormJH1 said:

    @rickwaugh said:
    Agreed, Ribbon. I’m with @max23 on the rest of the premise of this thread. Apple would lose no matter what they did here, and I can’t see them just deciding to build in planned obsolescence. They’re prolonging the life of an old device.

    It’s just so easy to get outraged over nothing.

    That depends how you define "planned obsolescence". There are things that hardware and software manufacturers routinely do that is just accepted by the consuming public as part of the price of doing business. If buy FIFA '18, you aren't going to see new content or updates for the game once the new version comes out. Some of the online features may shut off or no longer be supported. If you buy a phone or tablet in 2012, it would be pretty reasonable that device may not be able to run new iOS versions released in 2016, 2017, etc. And maybe some of new software requires the newer hardware and software, so you are encouraged to buy a new device. That, to me, is planned obsolescence.

    It's true that Apple's change to the operating system served a legitimate purpose - to prevent older phones from shutting down or failing. But that doesn't happen in a vacuum - it has to be combined with the following factors:

    1. Apple forces firmware updates on their products with auto install (some people don't even realize the update is happening), constant notifications and reminders telling you to upgrade, and (perhaps most maddeningly of all) making the decision to upgrade completely irreversible on an non-jailbroken device. I remember the decision to upgrade my iPad2 to iOS8 and later iOS9 felt like Russian Roulette...I had an aging but functional device and was risking making it completely non-functional through a coerced upgrade.
    2. This software decision causes a problem that has a very easy fix, but one that Apple doesn't easily allow: change the battery. In Apple's defense, there are probably dozens of good arguments why a slide-open or screw-open battery compartment may cause more harm than good. But early smartphones and virtually all laptops (until recently) had the option to remove the battery and carry a second one if you needed it. So good intention or not, making your device run poorly on old batteries pretty much forces you to buy a new device.
    3. Apple didn't come clean about this decision until they were forced to by Reddit and a tech journalist. If the decision to throttle performance is meant for the benefit of consumers, then why not just say that in a change log?

    Brilliant points. Totally agree.

    +1

  • @oat_phipps said:
    I would swear that my 5s is guilty of this too, even though it’s not listed. Takes forever to load up a level of Candy Crush these days.

    I don’t mind it though, the thing is 4 years old and at the end of its rope. It’s gotten me to put my damn phone down in public a lot more, knowing that I have to save my battery in case I need to call or text. These being the primary functions of a phone.

    The outrage seems like an overreaction based on good ol classic paranoia of corporations.

    I use a Mophie charger/case with my Iphone 6. It is like having 2 spare batteries with me all the time. They are quite reasonable onEbay: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Brand-New-mophie-Juice-Pack-Air-Battery-Case-For-Apple-iPhone-5-5S-5SE/282149696086?epid=1415119231&hash=item41b16eb256:m:myqM7_-JwPDgtuqi138f4Ww

  • edited December 2017

    @rickwaugh said:
    The entire way Apple runs their line is coming back to bite them, and will continue to bite them. Most folks really don’t need a faster CPU to use their phone, text, read facebook, browse the web. They are slowly figuring it out, that they don’t have to spend a grand every year on a new phone. There’s an excellent chance ever more people will slowly migrate to Android phones, the cheaper ones. If you could buy a cheap phone that doesn’t have all the additional crap Samsung and others include, that could do the basics, and possibly allow for upgrades, (or just be cheap enough to not care,) and people were not so intent on Apple as a statement of fashion, that cheap phone could gut the market. Actually wouldn’t be surprised if it was already there.

    That being said, Android does not have a way to change out the battery, at least, I’ve never seen one. They do allow you to add the internal storage card.

    All points to the contrary, apple it’s selling more phones than ever at the most expensive price they’ve ever been. If people can afford a $1000 phone they will buy a $1000 phone and there are lots of people who can. Cheap phones are for people that can’t afford a premium or mid-range device and therefore are worthless to the ecosystem they’re joining because they won’t buy any apps, suscribe/use any services, buy other devices in the ecosystem like a smart watch or a tablet, buy media...

    Being a cheap device also means they won’t get the newest features and probably no updates at all as the profit the company makes selling devices like these it’s none, even for data collection (the only reasonable value google could see in cheap android) are kinda pointless when the can’t even get the newest features the data serves as feedback.

    The only other customer purchasing cheap android it’s people that doesn’t care about tech, basically using their smartphones as feature phones, and also doesn’t matter to the big picture.

    Premium android and iOS are the future. And will probably get even more expensive.

  • Okay let’s proceed with Battery-gate then. >:)

  • This is all over the news now...

  • @Telefunky said:
    just a hint: these batteries are explosives if handled the wrong way.
    If the charger doesn't exactly match the type, it's likely to blow up.
    (you never wondered why there are no Li/Ion etc rechargeables in the local store ?)
    People WILL mount whatever crap without thinking if given the opportunity ;)

    i had a iphone charger blow up in my face at work, was using a workmates iphone charger and went to grab my phone on my lunch break. the charger literally exploded. small pieces of metal flew past my face and all that was left of the charger was the prongs in the power point. scary af. everyone came running because the explosion sounded like a gunshot. there was a large black burn mark on the wall around the powerpoint. think it was a cheap 3rd party charger from ebay, but looked like a legit apple charger

  • edited December 2017

    I actually had the battery in mind, but as you say... chargers can be dangerous, too.
    Though your accident may have been just bad luck.
    A capacitor inside the device blew up, and developed enough gas to break the housing.
    Likely by a spark that lit the gas inside it. Indeed frightening...

  • @knewspeak said:
    Another disturbing fact is the silence from inside Apple, no one dared to speak out about this, that just hints at the work ethic that must be in place at Apple. Sad and scary.

    If you write negative about Apple you don't get exclusives and you won't be invited to product launches. In other words you can forget it.

  • @StormJH1 said:

    @rickwaugh said:
    Agreed, Ribbon. I’m with @max23 on the rest of the premise of this thread. Apple would lose no matter what they did here, and I can’t see them just deciding to build in planned obsolescence. They’re prolonging the life of an old device.

    It’s just so easy to get outraged over nothing.

    That depends how you define "planned obsolescence". There are things that hardware and software manufacturers routinely do that is just accepted by the consuming public as part of the price of doing business. If buy FIFA '18, you aren't going to see new content or updates for the game once the new version comes out. Some of the online features may shut off or no longer be supported. If you buy a phone or tablet in 2012, it would be pretty reasonable that device may not be able to run new iOS versions released in 2016, 2017, etc. And maybe some of new software requires the newer hardware and software, so you are encouraged to buy a new device. That, to me, is planned obsolescence.

    It's true that Apple's change to the operating system served a legitimate purpose - to prevent older phones from shutting down or failing. But that doesn't happen in a vacuum - it has to be combined with the following factors:

    1. Apple forces firmware updates on their products with auto install (some people don't even realize the update is happening), constant notifications and reminders telling you to upgrade, and (perhaps most maddeningly of all) making the decision to upgrade completely irreversible on an non-jailbroken device. I remember the decision to upgrade my iPad2 to iOS8 and later iOS9 felt like Russian Roulette...I had an aging but functional device and was risking making it completely non-functional through a coerced upgrade.
    2. This software decision causes a problem that has a very easy fix, but one that Apple doesn't easily allow: change the battery. In Apple's defense, there are probably dozens of good arguments why a slide-open or screw-open battery compartment may cause more harm than good. But early smartphones and virtually all laptops (until recently) had the option to remove the battery and carry a second one if you needed it. So good intention or not, making your device run poorly on old batteries pretty much forces you to buy a new device.
    3. Apple didn't come clean about this decision until they were forced to by Reddit and a tech journalist. If the decision to throttle performance is meant for the benefit of consumers, then why not just say that in a change log?

    Hear hear

  • WTF. If I paid $800 for a music device I expect it to continue working a few years later. There really needs to be a OS based around serious music creation the way apple used to. Something stable that is for professional musicians and not just a candy crush/Facebook station that they keep needlessly updating but not fixing anything and fucking customers in the process

  • I'd rather get a notification that my battery is failing than have Apple secretly throttle my CPU.

  • edited December 2017

    Apple being sued over slowing down older iPhones

  • edited December 2017

    @TheoryNotes said:
    I'd rather get a notification that my battery is failing than have Apple secretly throttle my CPU.

    Well as mentioned before the throttling is essential since your iPhone would shutdown without notice several times per day...

    BUT , you are correct about the notification. If someone paid the 3 years extended warranty then the device should be replaced,since it's not working as expected.
    I will not be surprised if Apple will be obliged replacing those devices .( covered with warranty)

  • @Korakios said:

    @TheoryNotes said:
    I'd rather get a notification that my battery is failing than have Apple secretly throttle my CPU.

    Well as mentioned before the throttling is essential since your iPhone would shutdown without notice several times per day...

    BUT , you are correct about the notification. If someone paid the 3 years extended warranty then the device should be replaced,since it's not working as expected.
    I will not be surprised if Apple will be obliged replacing those devices .( covered with warranty)

    And those without AppleCare too. From their own website:

    “Under consumer laws in the UK, consumers are entitled to a free of charge repair or replacement, discount or refund by the seller, of defective goods or goods which do not conform with the contract of sale. For goods purchased in England or Wales, these rights expire six years from delivery of the goods and for goods purchased in Scotland, these rights expire five years from delivery of the goods.”

  • I don’t think batteries following the laws of physics would count as a defect under consumer legislation

  • edited December 2017

    @BiancaNeve said:
    I don’t think batteries following the laws of physics would count as a defect under consumer legislation

    I guess that depends whether customers have been told batteries have an optimum lifespan of 500 charges at the point of sale, and whether that’s an acceptable level of performance.

    I’ll guess we’ll soon find out.

  • @Telstar5 said:
    Apple being sued over slowing down older iPhones

    good news

  • @Korakios said:

    @TheoryNotes said:
    I'd rather get a notification that my battery is failing than have Apple secretly throttle my CPU.

    Well as mentioned before the throttling is essential since your iPhone would shutdown without notice several times per day...

    BUT , you are correct about the notification. If someone paid the 3 years extended warranty then the device should be replaced,since it's not working as expected.
    I will not be surprised if Apple will be obliged replacing those devices .( covered with warranty)

    Yes, I'm specifically talking about the situation where the OS recognizes the battery is failing, and has been programmed to compensate by throttling for that reason, instead of notifying the owner that the battery is failing.

    That is "the issue".

  • @StormJH1 said:

    (...)If the decision to throttle performance is meant for the benefit of consumers, then why not just say that in a change log?

    Oh, this is easy to explain. Some people say, it's because Apple is used to act intransparent in general. I think there is a different, really simple explanation for it:

    "Honesty"

    Yes! This is one of the four big ethical values of Apple. When they don't give any hint or explanation in a change log, this is done (non done...) because they strictly want to be honest. With other words, they have to lie if they speak openly about it...

    @BiancaNeve

    You are right. Apple guaranties 80 percent remaining capacity/battery life after 500 cycles. I think this is fair. In most cases an iPhone accepts 1000 cycles, some devices even 2000 before the batteries are defective.

    (other companies don't guarantee anything here)

  • Maybe Apple introduce a new "feature" with iOS 12. After you charged 500 times (with messages on the last 10 loading times that you need to buy a new device) your iPhone/iPad it will shut down and you can´t use it anymore because you are a stupid customer and Apple cares about you. Apple just want to save you from all the difficult choices you could waste time on your self. They know what´s best for you. Trust them, they really are good guys and just want the best for you. >:) o:)

  • Maybe it should automatically buy a new device for you as soon as 80% is reached — using the Apple Pay you’d have already set up.

  • @u0421793 said:
    Maybe it should automatically buy a new device for you as soon as 80% is reached — using the Apple Pay you’d have already set up.

    Better at 50% to be sure :D

  • @u0421793 said:
    Maybe it should automatically buy a new device for you as soon as 80% is reached — using the Apple Pay you’d have already set up.

    Heck, why not go all the way and have an Apple hardware subscription? They’ll automatically send you a new iPhone every 2 years, new iPad every 3 years and new Mac every 4 years. And you won’t ever have to wait in line!

  • @TheoryNotes said:

    (...) instead of notifying the owner that the battery is failing.

    That is "the issue".

    Sorry, it isn't. Look into settings->battery. When your iPhone battery is depleted (capacity below 80 percent) you will get a message that informs you. This is true for iOS >10.2.1.

    The app which is written here in the comments ("battery life") and a call with apple care would inform you, too.

    Maybe it is a good idea just to use the options you have.

  • @Cib said:
    Maybe Apple introduce a new "feature" with iOS 12. After you charged 500 times (...)

    Plain wrong. I know that your text is ironic, but i don't think it is justified to make a drama (or speculate about a coming drama) when there is no drama at all.

    I have clearly written that most of iPhone and iPad batteries will work fine for much more than 500 complete cycles (not: "charging"), a bit depending on your usage style.

    Even my iPhone 4s (5 years old and very intense usage) has a fine and fit battery.

Sign In or Register to comment.