Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

OT: Vent About Global Pandemic Management *HERE*

15681011159

Comments

  • @InfoCheck said:
    President Trump said he may get tested for the Corona virus at some point. The Miami mayor Just tested positive for the virus. He and the President met with the same Brazilian delegation which had one member who’s since tested positive for the virus. Hopefully the President’s doctors tell him to take the test and he complies ASAP.

    Nothing could get a Narcissists attention like a deadly illness but he would still only focus on his own treatment and care. But he'd need to hand off the day to day and it could only be better, right?

    Press exposure of his character? (the candid video as he really is - Grab 'em...)? No.
    Russian influence and a love of dictators for best the best Leader? No.
    The Courts for illegal actions? No. (The DOJ Memo says you can't indict).
    Mueller investigation? No.
    Impeachment conviction? No.
    Deadly Virus? ...

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @Max23 said:

    @Carnbot said:

    @Max23 said

    Yes it needs careful cooperation to prevent deaths..but it's important not to spread false assumptions.

    in case you didn't notice this is realtime data and not false assumptions.
    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

    Yes I’m aware of the data just not drawing false conclusions from it at this stage :)

  • @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    i don’t vote

  • @MonzoPro said:

    @Krupa said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    Indeed, they're playing this 'nudge' game because they think they can control our behaviour. It works at some levels but it's deeply patronising.

    Expendable pawns, hundreds of thousands sacrificed so the government can sneak off with their rich mates in the hope it boosts immunity.

    When, if, we get through this, Johnson & Co will have to face a very angry public.

    Food shortages and unnecessary deaths of loved ones tends to focus the mind.

    I’m consoling myself by going through old episodes of the new statesman, this clip is spot on about the way things are being handled.

  • edited March 2020

    @Max23 : please read the section of the medium article about fatality rate estimates. The likely accurate number is much lower (which is still very very very bad because of how many will be affected).

    I think if you read the article, you will see that the “real” rate is likely to to turn out to be far less than 6% but it will still be bad:

    https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca

  • @espiegel123 said:
    @JeffChasteen : nailed it :)

    “I don’t take responsibility at all”

    What’s New Pussygrabber?

  • @Paul16 said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    i don’t vote

    And you think that was a good plan, now we have at least five years of proper fascist rule?

  • @mister_rz said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @Krupa said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    Indeed, they're playing this 'nudge' game because they think they can control our behaviour. It works at some levels but it's deeply patronising.

    Expendable pawns, hundreds of thousands sacrificed so the government can sneak off with their rich mates in the hope it boosts immunity.

    When, if, we get through this, Johnson & Co will have to face a very angry public.

    Food shortages and unnecessary deaths of loved ones tends to focus the mind.

    I’m consoling myself by going through old episodes of the new statesman, this clip is spot on about the way things are being handled.

    Brilliant, love Rik Mayall.

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • wimwim
    edited March 2020

    @Max23 said:
    the ship is a very good lab to look at because a ship is isolated ...

    Not really because that environment is nothing like the rest of the environment. Forced containment, no need to go out to get groceries, everyone breathing a lot more of the same air as everyone else, more consistent (I didn't say better, just more consistent) medical attention and supervision, smaller population to contain and educate, etc. etc. etc.

  • @MonzoPro said:

    @mister_rz said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @Krupa said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    Indeed, they're playing this 'nudge' game because they think they can control our behaviour. It works at some levels but it's deeply patronising.

    Expendable pawns, hundreds of thousands sacrificed so the government can sneak off with their rich mates in the hope it boosts immunity.

    When, if, we get through this, Johnson & Co will have to face a very angry public.

    Food shortages and unnecessary deaths of loved ones tends to focus the mind.

    I’m consoling myself by going through old episodes of the new statesman, this clip is spot on about the way things are being handled.

    Brilliant, love Rik Mayall.

    He’s an absolute legend, wish there was more bitting political satire around now, good for stress relief.

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this? It seems insane, which is roughly what I'd expect from my ex-mayor, but maybe I'm missing some piece of brilliance...

    I actually think they did pretty well at the news conference. All clearly laid out and quite logical.

    What part is worrying you?

  • @Max23 said:

    @espiegel123 said:
    @Max23 : please read the section of the medium article about fatality rate estimates. The likely accurate number is much lower (which is still very very very bad because of how many will be affected).

    I think if you read the article, you will see that the “real” rate is going to turn out to be far less but still bad:

    https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca

    "The last relevant example is the Diamond Princess cruise: with 706 cases, 6 deaths and 100 recoveries, the fatality rate will be between 1% and 6.5%."

    the ship is a very good lab to look at because a ship is isolated ...
    706 cases, 6 deaths and 100 recoveries
    if you don't sugar coat it its 6%

    !!!

    Max, you keep quoting 6% as if that is going to be the overall death rate but that is not what the experts or article says or even what the quoted passage says. It MIGHT be that high but if you read the article that is a worst case. There is general consensus that it will be quite a bit lower which is still going to be much worse than the flu and will be millions dead worldwide. Unlikely (but possible) that it will be 6% according to the people with expertise in the field.

    A very important part of the article is about how the fatality rate will be heavily influenced by the degree to which we flatten the curve since a lot of the deaths are due to lack of respirators. In Italy, they have to decide who gets respirators since there is more demand than supply..and the decision is based on years left. They are literally having to decide who gets a chance to survive.

    But in many places it isn’t too late to flatten the curve significantly. And they have done it in some places.

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @AudioGus said:

    @Toastedghost said:

    @AndyPlankton said:

    @topaz said:
    I spent last year struggling with social anxiety caused by too much isolation, prescription was to get out of studio more.

    Talk about a total opposite right now.

    Damn, that's a kicker. Is it physical social contact that makes you anxious ? Does online socialising count as getting out of the studio ?

    Going out tonight, Sowerby Bridge, Electronic Open Night. Got a 15 min slot, wife thinks am a bit crazy to go. But gotta get some air.

    Hell yah, live your life! I am going to resume my hobby of licking trashcan handles.

    Well when I was 11 I was hit by a tram, my head stuck under the cow catcher, at 13 a guy brook my leg, at 17 I went on a bike into the back of Landrover, and I have survived 2 major car accidents. If something is going to take me of this plain then my time is obviously up.
    Twas a really good night at Sowerby Bridge.

  • @supadom said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this? It seems insane, which is roughly what I'd expect from my ex-mayor, but maybe I'm missing some piece of brilliance...

    I actually think they did pretty well at the news conference. All clearly laid out and quite logical.

    What part is worrying you?

    The gap in logic when they say that they both want to delay the spread but also don't want to act now because they think we'll get fed up of being responsible. It seems that they're wanting to gamble that a rapid spread in the population will create a herd immunity without reconciling that the NHS won't be able to withstand such a rapid spread. Essentially they're trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the population that they've already gaslit for the past few years.

  • @Krupa said:

    @supadom said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this? It seems insane, which is roughly what I'd expect from my ex-mayor, but maybe I'm missing some piece of brilliance...

    I actually think they did pretty well at the news conference. All clearly laid out and quite logical.

    What part is worrying you?

    The gap in logic when they say that they both want to delay the spread but also don't want to act now because they think we'll get fed up of being responsible. It seems that they're wanting to gamble that a rapid spread in the population will create a herd immunity without reconciling that the NHS won't be able to withstand such a rapid spread. Essentially they're trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the population that they've already gaslit for the past few years.

    It sounds like they are taking a risky approach that has these assumptions:

    • the health care system has the capacity (I,e, enough respirators and intensive care facilities) to handle the at-risk patients that need treatment
    • That people getting sick will develop immunity as with many viruses
    • That they have some model to control transmission via sporadic social distancing measures that will optimize the time it takes for a large pool of people to be immune and that herd immunity will kick in

    Sounds risky because all their models’ assumptions need to be correct or there is a real catastrophe,

  • @espiegel123 said:

    @Krupa said:

    @supadom said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this? It seems insane, which is roughly what I'd expect from my ex-mayor, but maybe I'm missing some piece of brilliance...

    I actually think they did pretty well at the news conference. All clearly laid out and quite logical.

    What part is worrying you?

    The gap in logic when they say that they both want to delay the spread but also don't want to act now because they think we'll get fed up of being responsible. It seems that they're wanting to gamble that a rapid spread in the population will create a herd immunity without reconciling that the NHS won't be able to withstand such a rapid spread. Essentially they're trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the population that they've already gaslit for the past few years.

    It sounds like they are taking a risky approach that has these assumptions:

    • the health care system has the capacity (I,e, enough respirators and intensive care facilities) to handle the at-risk patients that need treatment
    • That people getting sick will develop immunity as with many viruses
    • That they have some model to control transmission via sporadic social distancing measures that will optimize the time it takes for a large pool of people to be immune and that herd immunity will kick in

    Sounds risky because all their models’ assumptions need to be correct or there is a real catastrophe,

    Feels like they're seeing bad things ahead no matter what and so playing for some sort of win, double or quits, but with the UK population. Nasty.

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @Krupa said:

    @supadom said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this? It seems insane, which is roughly what I'd expect from my ex-mayor, but maybe I'm missing some piece of brilliance...

    I actually think they did pretty well at the news conference. All clearly laid out and quite logical.

    What part is worrying you?

    The gap in logic when they say that they both want to delay the spread but also don't want to act now because they think we'll get fed up of being responsible. It seems that they're wanting to gamble that a rapid spread in the population will create a herd immunity without reconciling that the NHS won't be able to withstand such a rapid spread. Essentially they're trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the population that they've already gaslit for the past few years.

    The gap in logic was also clear when they said that people are infectious before they’re symptomatic but only those with symptoms need to self isolate ...although maybe that is revealing of the intention to accelerate the spread without broadcasting it too much to create the herd immunity. I agree it’s a huge gamble but judging by the U Turn on mass gatherings and what I’m seeing as growing public concern at their plan, they are re-thinking their approach.

  • @Max23 said:
    "That people getting sick will develop immunity as with many viruses"

    We have heard nothing of reinfections yet.
    so it seems like you are immune after you had it for a while,
    some universities or on it to get those antiviral things out of ppl to develop something ... we will see how that turns out.

    There is some concern because some people that recovered from the virus have tested positive for the virus at a point when scientists expected them to test negative.

    This doesn’t mean they were re-infected as there are other explanations. But a friend that is in a medical testing related field indicated that there is some concern as to what that means and there have been reports in China of some patients that have become reinfected. There are a lot of possible explanations that aren’t worrisome, but some caution against some assumptions that are being made as we don’t have enough data.

  • edited March 2020
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Yup, most of my mates who are still in London are getting sent home today so that's good, I'm lucky, I've lived in the sticks for years so remote working is the norm but they're starting from scratch...

  • @MonzoPro said:

    @Paul16 said:

    @MonzoPro said:

    @cian said:
    Also if anyone British can explain what the fuck the British government is doing about this?

    Lots of things are being done behind the scenes, but none of it to help the majority of the people they are supposed to serve.

    They’ll be planning how to contain the natives, when we start rioting through lack of food, and seeing our family and friends die needlessly.

    ‘Stock up the bunker with champers Sebastian, and ensure security shoot any over-curious pleb on sight’.

    Yet still they vote for these c#nts.

    i don’t vote

    And you think that was a good plan, now we have at least five years of proper fascist rule?

    just don’t play that game anymore. the whole charade is too tainted

  • @Toastedghost said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @Toastedghost said:

    @AndyPlankton said:

    @topaz said:
    I spent last year struggling with social anxiety caused by too much isolation, prescription was to get out of studio more.

    Talk about a total opposite right now.

    Damn, that's a kicker. Is it physical social contact that makes you anxious ? Does online socialising count as getting out of the studio ?

    Going out tonight, Sowerby Bridge, Electronic Open Night. Got a 15 min slot, wife thinks am a bit crazy to go. But gotta get some air.

    Hell yah, live your life! I am going to resume my hobby of licking trashcan handles.

    Well when I was 11 I was hit by a tram, my head stuck under the cow catcher, at 13 a guy brook my leg, at 17 I went on a bike into the back of Landrover, and I have survived 2 major car accidents. If something is going to take me of this plain then my time is obviously up.
    Twas a really good night at Sowerby Bridge.

    ‘survivor bias’

  • edited March 2020

    Things which happens now, never happened with any flu or other pandemic since World War 1.
    So maybe the above 10.000 knows more and there is something more dangerous going on with this „flu“ as we think. We know nothing.
    Oh, some people are doomed and some making huge profit.

Sign In or Register to comment.