Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Bram Bos / Hainbach collab?

1…1617192122

Comments

  • Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredrWrlds2ndBstGeoshredr

    @skiphunt said:

    The point is... sometimes life prevents some of these devs from being as responsive as you'd like them to be on your $6 iOS app. I'm not a fan boy of Audio Damage or anything, but overall they have a very nice collection of excellent apps that were mostly under $10. Nothing wrong with critique mind you, but when they have a fairly decent track record... I personally don't find it that hard to cut them a little slack.

    I’m with you, but the folks who paid $300 for one of AD’s defective Euro modules that they abandoned before getting it to work and never refunded probably feel differently.

  • oat_phippsoat_phipps

    @Gavinski said:

    @david_2017 said:

    @Gavinski said:
    Semi decent workaround for the lack of 'record then overdub' - just press overdub any time after you have pressed record, then unpress record just after the marker goes back to the start of the loop.

    This is how I do it. Set length, tap overdub and record and flow.

    What I still have to say here is here: You were absolutely right, BitJuggler is MADE for Gauss also. Bitjuggler, Tape Pro and Gauss are one wonderful trio!!!

    Ah totally, BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water in this case.

    Note though, what I was talking about was pressing overdub AFTER record, not before. That way, the loop will snap back to the beginning when record is pressed, if you press overdub before record it will not.

    Hey now! I think it's unfair to developers to turn commercial apps into a competition and say things like "BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water". They are different apps in philosophy and both have their uses and I am happy to have both in my "tool set" as I navigate my "iOS workflow". Blessed are we to have all these amazing options from amazing, dedicated developers.

    Can I make the sunglasses smiley any bigger and add a giant smirk?

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @oat_phipps said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @david_2017 said:

    @Gavinski said:
    Semi decent workaround for the lack of 'record then overdub' - just press overdub any time after you have pressed record, then unpress record just after the marker goes back to the start of the loop.

    This is how I do it. Set length, tap overdub and record and flow.

    What I still have to say here is here: You were absolutely right, BitJuggler is MADE for Gauss also. Bitjuggler, Tape Pro and Gauss are one wonderful trio!!!

    Ah totally, BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water in this case.

    Note though, what I was talking about was pressing overdub AFTER record, not before. That way, the loop will snap back to the beginning when record is pressed, if you press overdub before record it will not.

    Hey now! I think it's unfair to developers to turn commercial apps into a competition and say things like "BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water". They are different apps in philosophy and both have their uses and I am happy to have both in my "tool set" as I navigate my "iOS workflow". Blessed are we to have all these amazing options from amazing, dedicated developers.

    Can I make the sunglasses smiley any bigger and add a giant smirk?

    If this was from anyone other than you I might read this literally Oat 😜

  • ChrisGChrisG

    And Bit Maestro blows them all ou...wait...Like other effects and mixing tools, it all comes down to what sound you’re after. I have never come across that elusive effect that owns all other effects, one to rule them all. If that was the case I wouldn’t have 2557 compressors and 7356 reverbs around 😂

  • audiblevideoaudiblevideo
    edited November 2020

    @ChrisG said:
    And Bit Maestro blows them all ou...wait...Like other effects and mixing tools, it all comes down to what sound you’re after. I have never come across that elusive effect that owns all other effects, one to rule them all. If that was the case I wouldn’t have 2557 compressors and 7356 reverbs around 😂

    I was watching a guy talk about “mastering” mixes specifically with reverbs, on one track he used 8 DIFFERENT reverbs. Not 8 different presets on one reverb, 8 different hardware boxes. I could understand 2, but 8 seems overkill. A different tools for each job applies, but excluding experimental music and FX uses, most straight forward songs are only performed in one room/hall/stadium.

  • ChrisGChrisG

    @audiblevideo said:

    @ChrisG said:
    And Bit Maestro blows them all ou...wait...Like other effects and mixing tools, it all comes down to what sound you’re after. I have never come across that elusive effect that owns all other effects, one to rule them all. If that was the case I wouldn’t have 2557 compressors and 7356 reverbs around 😂

    I was watching a guy talk about “mastering” mixes specifically with reverbs, on one track he used 8 DIFFERENT reverbs. Not 8 different presets on one reverb, 8 different hardware boxes. I could understand 2, but 8 seems overkill. A different tools for each job applies, but excluding experimental music and FX uses, most straight forward songs are only performed in one room/hall/stadium.

    But a lot of performed songs uses additional reverbs as well. Orchestral music is probably the exception to the rule here as that relies heavily on the actual hall acoustics. 8 reverbs...maybe he was mixing something where each track had stuff further back/close up in the mix and he didn’t know how to use plugins😂, really no idea

  • oat_phippsoat_phipps

    @ChrisG said:
    And Bit Maestro blows them all ou...wait...Like other effects and mixing tools, it all comes down to what sound you’re after. I have never come across that elusive effect that owns all other effects, one to rule them all. If that was the case I wouldn’t have 2557 compressors and 7356 reverbs around 😂

    There's honestly really only one chorus on iOS...FAC.

    I just spent some time trying to pay with Enso, some of you may be happy to hear, but it took me longer to re-read the manual than I actually spent trying to find an idea to stick on. So I'm happy to announce that I was right after all; Gauss is an Enso killer. It goes too hard

  • GavinskiGavinski

    Also want to clarify I'm not knocking Gauss's 1989 button. When I said BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water it is just a slightly dramatic way to say that if you like that digital aliasing sound it is well worth exploring adding BitJuggler to your Gauss workflow. Those two apps are not even remotely in competition with each other 😋.

  • mlaumlau

    @Gavinski degrader is also great for that task

  • ashhashh

    @kinkujin said:

    @ashh said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @ashh said:

    @oceansinspace said:
    Hainbach is basically just an ambient musician as far as I know. I kinda feel he is overrated but I mean no disrespect and for weird music he is ok. ITs a smidgeon boring to me but im not an expert on his music. Super tape analog and lo fi. ITs ok for mellow times.

    +!

    I did like his video with the dude who makes his own tape machines and then makes tunes with them and adds sounds from his personally recorded foley library. That was really interesting.

    I find that most Youtubers' content is 95% fluff. Feeling pressured to churn out content on a daily or bi-daily basis has the inevitable effect of watering down that content.

    Whenever I see the Subscriber count of a channel I always wonder how many of those people still watch and out of those, how many watch on a regular basis?

    I wonder what is the point of a post(s) like this. To shit on an app developer on their unveiling? To bring someone down to earth? To be sure that we are all humble?

    I always think that the way someone interprets your actions is a window into their mind, their motivations, their actions.

    But if you are asking me what my thoughts, actions and motivations are for this post then they were that I don't like most of the content that Hainbach puts out, because of the way he approaches it. If, of course, that's ok with you?

    Yours, on tenterhooks xx

    Oh yes, @Ashh please do interpret my meaning, the window of my mind. I believe it would be fascinating. Thanks for revealing your window to us - it was so enlightening.

    @Gavinski said:
    Also want to clarify I'm not knocking Gauss's 1989 button. When I said BitJuggler blows the 1989 button out of the water it is just a slightly dramatic way to say that if you like that digital aliasing sound it is well worth exploring adding BitJuggler to your Gauss workflow. Those two apps are not even remotely in competition with each other 😋.

    Sorry but I hate the 1989 button because of your comment and I will not be using it again. FUCK. YOU. 1989. BUTTON! Also, I picked up on the very obvious promotion of competition between apps in this post. I have made a little running track and all my apps are being ranked by where they finish. I think it's time for you to go away and have a think.

  • McDMcD

    Almost made it to 20 pages without a food fight.

  • brambosbrambos

    I think you'll enjoy the upcoming update.

    But I'm still testing with a lot of volunteers to get external interfaces working. I want to get it right without making it very complicated, and there are so many different configurations out there it's a bit overwhelming.

    (I had almost forgotten the support horrors of standalone apps)

  • gkillmastergkillmaster

    @brambos said:
    I think you'll enjoy the upcoming update.

    But I'm still testing with a lot of volunteers to get external interfaces working. I want to get it right without making it very complicated, and there are so many different configurations out there it's a bit overwhelming.

    (I had almost forgotten the support horrors of standalone apps)

    Am I missing something thinking I wish we could visualize the overdub loops in the transport area?

  • brambosbrambos

    @gkillmaster said:

    @brambos said:
    I think you'll enjoy the upcoming update.

    But I'm still testing with a lot of volunteers to get external interfaces working. I want to get it right without making it very complicated, and there are so many different configurations out there it's a bit overwhelming.

    (I had almost forgotten the support horrors of standalone apps)

    Am I missing something thinking I wish we could visualize the overdub loops in the transport area?

    No you're not missing anything. It's not visible in the transport area.

  • celtic_elkceltic_elk

    @gkillmaster said:
    Am I missing something thinking I wish we could visualize the overdub loops in the transport area?

    Genuinely curious why this seems like an important feature to you.

  • gkillmastergkillmaster
    edited November 2020

    @celtic_elk said:

    @gkillmaster said:
    Am I missing something thinking I wish we could visualize the overdub loops in the transport area?

    Genuinely curious why this seems like an important feature to you.

    As I develop a phrase with multiple loops and speeds, just good to know where certain loops are. I like the going at it blind approach too, just would be nice to have the option.

  • ecamburnecamburn

    Sorry if this was already mentioned but is some sort of decay/fading of the loop on the roadmap?

  • brambosbrambos

    @ecamburn said:
    Sorry if this was already mentioned but is some sort of decay/fading of the loop on the roadmap?

    It sure is ;)

  • HalftoneHalftone

    @brambos said:

    @ecamburn said:
    Sorry if this was already mentioned but is some sort of decay/fading of the loop on the roadmap?

    It sure is ;)

    Sweet!!! Wasn’t fully expecting that!

  • ecamburnecamburn
    edited November 2020

    @brambos said:

    @ecamburn said:
    Sorry if this was already mentioned but is some sort of decay/fading of the loop on the roadmap?

    It sure is ;)

    I celebrate with 48 seconds of hastily assembled sadness recorded in Gauss

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OqVSE-qD6nnIVPAAymrU4GLHNmVLyJpE/view?usp=drivesdk

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • wimwim
    edited November 2020

    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

  • McDMcD

    And @Brambos is working on updates! Must buy for anyone that likes to create mangled audio.

  • Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredrWrlds2ndBstGeoshredr

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    Great idea.

  • CarnbotCarnbot

    I think other than the automation controls which are coming the main things I'd hope for is multitrack recording, then the triggers could sequence the tracks and also more slower time divisions for the triggers.
    But I know you can use multiple instances so it's not essential but a nice to have :)

  • lukesleepwalkerlukesleepwalker

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    File under "takes a great app and makes it sublime". I love this idea.

  • KrupaKrupa

    I’ve been using a square lfo on the tape speed, with a bit of inertia to slow the transition to get something similar, works a treat 😁

    @lukesleepwalker said:

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    File under "takes a great app and makes it sublime". I love this idea.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @Krupa said:
    I’ve been using a square lfo on the tape speed, with a bit of inertia to slow the transition to get something similar, works a treat 😁

    @lukesleepwalker said:

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    File under "takes a great app and makes it sublime". I love this idea.

    Is there any difference between doing that and just recording and during or after using the trig with pitch changes enabled and inertia on though? @krupa

  • wimwim
    edited November 2020

    @Gavinski said:

    @Krupa said:
    I’ve been using a square lfo on the tape speed, with a bit of inertia to slow the transition to get something similar, works a treat 😁

    @lukesleepwalker said:

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    File under "takes a great app and makes it sublime". I love this idea.

    Is there any difference between doing that and just recording and during or after using the trig with pitch changes enabled and inertia on though? @krupa

    If the cc sent by the LFO goes below the mid point, it causes the head to reverse direction. This is a great tip @Krupa. B)

    I still think it would be nice in-app, but will work well, and introduces lots of other possibilities.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @wim said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @Krupa said:
    I’ve been using a square lfo on the tape speed, with a bit of inertia to slow the transition to get something similar, works a treat 😁

    @lukesleepwalker said:

    @wim said:
    I must have jammed with this for about four hours straight last night. When I came up for air it was well after 2:00am. I thought at most it must be 11:30pm. I haven't gotten that lost in something since Sector. B)

    Something I kept thinking it could use: A pendulum reverse for the loop. Play to the end then play backward to the beginning, repeat. Probably with a configurable cross-fade to prevent glitches. Bonus points for optional motor reverse inertia.

    Just thought I'd throw that one out there...

    File under "takes a great app and makes it sublime". I love this idea.

    Is there any difference between doing that and just recording and during or after using the trig with pitch changes enabled and inertia on though? @krupa

    If the cc sent by the LFO goes below the mid point, it causes the head to reverse direction. This is a great tip @Krupa. B)

    I still think it would be nice in-app, but will work well, and introduces lots of other possibilities.

    Ah yeah, good point!

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025