Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Anyone into the WOO here? UFOs etc?

1141517192035

Comments

  • @monz0id said:
    “probably: insofar as seems reasonably true, factual, or to be expected : without much doubt”

    But with some doubt.

    Is "probably" the wrong word?

  • @tja said:
    Hmmm.
    Mhhh.

    There are of course UFOs, U.F.O.s, Unidentified Flying Objects.

    But those are NOT crafts of living beings from other planets, galaxies, universes or dimensions.

    My point of view 🤗

    I’d agree, most UFO sightings are very likely natural objects or phenomena, but there still remains quite a few that do hint at something quite extraordinary, possibly even ‘extraterrestrials’ or something we mistake as extraterrestrials.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Our “Understanding of Physics” is likely due a rude awakening in the not so distance future.

  • @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:
    “probably: insofar as seems reasonably true, factual, or to be expected : without much doubt”

    But with some doubt.

    “without much doubt”

    @Simon said:
    Is "probably" the wrong word?

    Yes, probably suggests military vehicles are the most likely explanation. But since it’s been recorded and documented by military personnel on a military base, and they have not confirmed it was a military vehicle, then it probably isn’t.

  • @monz0id said:
    Yes, probably suggests military vehicles are the most likely explanation. But since it’s been recorded and documented by military personnel on a military base, and they have not confirmed it was a military vehicle, then it probably isn’t.

    You haven't considered that the military might not be telling the public whole story...?

  • @monz0id said:
    “without much doubt”

    Surely "without much doubt" allows for there to be some doubt.

    A small amount. But not too much.

  • @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:
    Yes, probably suggests military vehicles are the most likely explanation. But since it’s been recorded and documented by military personnel on a military base, and they have not confirmed it was a military vehicle, then it probably isn’t.

    You haven't considered that the military might not be telling the public whole story...?

    I’d be surprised if they were, but I’d guess if technology that could do this stuff was available 40+ years ago we’d know about it by now.

  • @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:
    “without much doubt”

    Surely "without much doubt" allows for there to be some doubt.

    A small amount. But not too much.

    You can try and rewrite the dictionary definition as long as you like Simon, but your use of the word probably:

    “ it is probably some man-made "UFO" device, not from outer space. Probably military.”

    Is misplaced in this context. There is no actual proof to back up that statement.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • edited May 2023

    @monz0id said:
    You can try and rewrite the dictionary definition as long as you like Simon, but your use of the word probably:

    “ it is probably some man-made "UFO" device, not from outer space. Probably military.”

    Is misplaced in this context. There is no actual proof to back up that statement.

    I'm not saying there is proof.

    I was expressing an opinion that it is probably military (probably: almost certainly). But maybe it isn't military.

    Not "definitely" military (without any doubt).

    I am guessing you probably won't accept my reasoning...

  • @Simon said:

    I am guessing you probably won't accept my reasoning...

    You have no proof to back up that statement, Simon.

    Not yet anyway.

  • edited May 2023

    @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:
    You can try and rewrite the dictionary definition as long as you like Simon, but your use of the word probably:

    “ it is probably some man-made "UFO" device, not from outer space. Probably military.”

    Is misplaced in this context. There is no actual proof to back up that statement.

    I'm not saying there is proof.

    I was expressing an opinion that it is probably military (probably: almost certainly). But maybe it isn't military.

    Not "definitely" military (without any doubt).

    I am guessing you probably won't accept my reasoning...

    It’s got absolutely nothing to do with accepting your reasoning Simon, you’re arguing against a dictionary definition. If it really bothers you that much, take it up with Merriam-Webster.

    “ it is probably some man-made "UFO" device, not from outer space. Probably military.”

    If that’s the most likely explanation, you’d need at least some evidence as proof. But the military observers on the military base haven’t found any, and neither have any of the other investigators, so it is by any definition ‘unexplained’.

  • Never forget that people alive hundreds of years ago, hell even thousands, probably thought they knew everything too

  • @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:
    Our “Understanding of Physics” is likely due a rude awakening in the not so distance future.

    Why would that be?

    The argument that another intelligent lifeform would be unable to traverse the vast distances of space to reach us, based on our own 'understanding of physics' and our methods of propulsion is, in my opinion, greatly naive.

  • If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • edited May 2023

    @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:

    @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:
    Our “Understanding of Physics” is likely due a rude awakening in the not so distance future.

    Why would that be?

    The argument that another intelligent lifeform would be unable to traverse the vast distances of space to reach us, based on our own 'understanding of physics' and our methods of propulsion is, in my opinion, greatly naive.

    If you think so 😅

    I do. :)

    @tja said:

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    Or, if you could create your destination right in front of you.
    Just will not happen 🤗

    Naive dreams, in my opinion.
    Based on science fiction literature.

    Whereas your opinion is naively based on a relatively minuscule amount of years of human endeavour in the sciences.

    But that's ok.

    It's a fascinating topic and debate is healthy.

  • heshes
    edited May 2023

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    You thought space-time was unbent? No, gravity bends space-time everywhere. And the path of light follows the bends in space-time. But, who knows, maybe there are wrinkles that enable what you want. https://www.science.org.au/curious/space-time/gravity

  • @tja said:

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    Or, if you could create your destination right in front of you.
    Just will not happen 🤗

    Naive dreams, in my opinion.
    Based on science fiction literature.

    At this point I think you are trolling.

    @hes said:

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    You thought space-time was unbent? No, gravity bends space-time everywhere. And the path of light follows the bends in space-time. But, who knows, maybe there are wrinkles that enable what you want. https://www.science.org.au/curious/space-time/gravity

    No. Space time is already warped.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:

    @tja said:

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    Or, if you could create your destination right in front of you.
    Just will not happen 🤗

    Naive dreams, in my opinion.
    Based on science fiction literature.

    Whereas your opinion is naively based on a relatively minuscule amount of years of human endeavour in the sciences.

    But that's ok.

    It's a fascinating topic and debate is healthy.

    Each as he want to see reality.
    I don't expect to see any change.

    Minds can either be open or closed.

    I'm always amazed by those that choose the latter. Especially considering how much our understanding of the world and universe has changed so often and consistently through just the last few hundred years with each new discovery.

    So is there nothing new to learn in Physics?

    For me, that's the outlandish stance to take.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:

    @tja said:

    @SpookyZoo said:

    @tja said:

    @cyberheater said:
    If you can bend space then you can effectively travel fast then the speed of light. Much much faster.

    Or, if you could create your destination right in front of you.
    Just will not happen 🤗

    Naive dreams, in my opinion.
    Based on science fiction literature.

    Whereas your opinion is naively based on a relatively minuscule amount of years of human endeavour in the sciences.

    But that's ok.

    It's a fascinating topic and debate is healthy.

    Each as he want to see reality.
    I don't expect to see any change.

    Minds can either be open or closed.

    I'm always amazed by those that choose the latter. Especially considering how much our understanding of the world and universe has changed so often and consistently through just the last few hundred years with each new discovery.

    So is there nothing new to learn in Physics?

    For me, that's the outlandish stance to take.

    Really.
    Is this a new kind of religion?

    Feel free to believe or hope whatever you want or need.
    But be prepared that others have a different stance to this topic.

    🧐

    Having confidence that science will make new discoveries is now a religion?

    ...ok.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • edited May 2023

    @tja said:
    Sure not.
    I'm surprised that some people really believe or hope or imagine such things.
    Unexpected.

    But why are you in this thread then. It's pretty obvious you are a hard skeptic and nothing that we say it's going to change your mind. It's pointless you being in this thread.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @tja said:

    Sciences that defies physical laws is unlikely 😅

    Because that's never happened before in human history!! hahaha 🤣🤣

This discussion has been closed.