Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesnā€™t stop thereā€”Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Moog is now part of inMusic: UPDATE šŸ˜ž

16791112

Comments

  • @NeuM said:

    @Stuntman_mike said:

    @NeuM said:

    @Stuntman_mike said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @belldu said:

    @Crawlingwind said:
    Are eyebrow slits still cool 2023?
    The eyebrow slit, popular in the '90s and inspired by R&B, rock, and hip-hop music artists, has made a comeback. The social media platform TikTok rebooted the edgy eyebrow slit trend in 2020-2023, which resonated with a lot of people and has become one of the most popular eyebrow trends of the year.

    This is why I frequent this place... what other music forum keeps me informed on eyebrow trends?

    And yeah, that video was more of a hit job on Behringer than anything particularly insightful regarding Moog.

    Influencers seem to be ganging up on Behringer at the moment, this is the third Iā€™ve seen.

    I donā€™t know if anyone is ā€œganging upā€ on Behringer, but with their CEO it seems like theyā€™ve certainly earned the ire. Itā€™s one thing to offer knockoffs of old synths and quite another thing to aggressively attack customers.

    Apparently Behringer was offered Moog and turned down the purchase due to Moog being a luxury brand, out of the price range of Behringer customersā€¦

    inMusic isnā€™t exactly known as a holder of luxury brands. I suspect theyā€™ll attempt to meet Behringer on their terms with new products, eroding Behringerā€™s market dominance and possibly undermining their own seal of quality at the same time.

    Behringer and Moog:
    https://synthanatomy.com/2023/10/ex-moog-ceo-mike-adams-offered-uli-the-moog-brand-to-buy-says-behringer.html

    There are limited number of companies which couldā€™ve bought Moog out. Whatā€™s the point of Behringer admitting theyā€™re so low-rent they couldnā€™t afford Moog? Makes them look bad, not Moog.

    Knowing Behringer they love to give the finger, as you said above, so it could be possible, some of their past and present moves defy logic.

  • wimwim
    edited October 2023

    Behringer bashing is fair. There's plenty to bash.

    But Behringer did not kill off Moog. Moog ended up where they are because there is no longer enough market for their products at the prices needed to sustain production the way they chose to carry it out. It would have happened whether Behringer was selling cheaper knockoffs or not. It's wrong to conclude that the people who would buy a Behringer ripoff would have bought a high cost Moog were the cheap alternative not available. Maybe a few, but I doubt enough to make a difference.

    Cool info on the eyebrow @Tarekith. šŸ‘šŸ¼
    Please tell me he was fighting someone like Joe Rogan or Mark Zukerberg. šŸ˜‚

  • edited October 2023

    @wim said:
    Behringer bashing is fair. There's plenty to bash.

    But Behringer did not kill off Moog. They ended up where they are because there is no longer enough market for their products at the prices needed to sustain production the way they chose to carry it out. It would have happened whether Behringer was selling cheaper knockoffs or not. It's wrong to conclude that the people who would buy a Behringer ripoff would have bought a high cost Moog were the cheap alternative not available. Maybe a few, but I doubt enough to make a difference.

    Accurate. There is a limited market for high-end brands in music. Most musicians are not very wealthy.

  • I would buy a Moog DFAM over a Behringer Edge if the DFAM had MIDI. The knobs are waaaay better on the DFAM, like not even close. Build quality...much better. But you'd think, in this day and age, Moog could have added MIDI support. These are the reasons why, imo, Moog is behind. The quality of life additions just aren't there.

  • edited October 2023

    @wim said:
    Behringer bashing is fair. There's plenty to bash.

    But Behringer did not kill off Moog. Moog ended up where they are because there is no longer enough market for their products at the prices needed to sustain production the way they chose to carry it out. It would have happened whether Behringer was selling cheaper knockoffs or not. It's wrong to conclude that the people who would buy a Behringer ripoff would have bought a high cost Moog were the cheap alternative not available. Maybe a few, but I doubt enough to make a difference.

    Cool info on the eyebrow @Tarekith. šŸ‘šŸ¼
    Please tell me he was fighting someone like Joe Rogan or Mark Zukerberg. šŸ˜‚

    Strangely I started looking at Behringer like a hardware alternative to the Arturia V Collection the other day. Beh gear is almost cheap enough to be plugins, well at least some of it. Lol

    Plugins donā€™t get bashed like hardware homages šŸ¤·šŸ½ā€ā™‚ļø

  • @drez said:
    I would buy a Moog DFAM over a Behringer Edge if the DFAM had MIDI. The knobs are waaaay better on the DFAM, like not even close. Build quality...much better. But you'd think, in this day and age, Moog could have added MIDI support. These are the reasons why, imo, Moog is behind. The quality of life additions just aren't there.

    Honestly, Iā€™d like to see Moog adopt precision motor control over their knobs and settings so automation could be implemented, in the same way some new hardware synth competitors are implementing.

  • edited October 2023

    @knewspeak said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @belldu said:

    @Crawlingwind said:
    Are eyebrow slits still cool 2023?
    The eyebrow slit, popular in the '90s and inspired by R&B, rock, and hip-hop music artists, has made a comeback. The social media platform TikTok rebooted the edgy eyebrow slit trend in 2020-2023, which resonated with a lot of people and has become one of the most popular eyebrow trends of the year.

    This is why I frequent this place... what other music forum keeps me informed on eyebrow trends?

    And yeah, that video was more of a hit job on Behringer than anything particularly insightful regarding Moog.

    Influencers seem to be ganging up on Behringer at the moment, this is the third Iā€™ve seen.

    I donā€™t know if anyone is ā€œganging upā€ on Behringer, but with their CEO it seems like theyā€™ve certainly earned the ire. Itā€™s one thing to offer knockoffs of old synths and quite another thing to aggressively attack customers.

    I agree, but still it would appear to be a combined concerted effort by several influencers.

    I don't think it is coordinated, but frankly behringer deserve whatever they get after the way they treated Peter Kirn, among much other disgusting behaviour

  • @Stuntman_mike said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @belldu said:

    @Crawlingwind said:
    Are eyebrow slits still cool 2023?
    The eyebrow slit, popular in the '90s and inspired by R&B, rock, and hip-hop music artists, has made a comeback. The social media platform TikTok rebooted the edgy eyebrow slit trend in 2020-2023, which resonated with a lot of people and has become one of the most popular eyebrow trends of the year.

    This is why I frequent this place... what other music forum keeps me informed on eyebrow trends?

    And yeah, that video was more of a hit job on Behringer than anything particularly insightful regarding Moog.

    Influencers seem to be ganging up on Behringer at the moment, this is the third Iā€™ve seen.

    I donā€™t know if anyone is ā€œganging upā€ on Behringer, but with their CEO it seems like theyā€™ve certainly earned the ire. Itā€™s one thing to offer knockoffs of old synths and quite another thing to aggressively attack customers.

    Apparently Behringer was offered Moog and turned down the purchase due to Moog being a luxury brand, out of the price range of Behringer customersā€¦

    Behringer is already selling knockoffs of most of Moog's line anyway. What do they need Moog for?

  • inmusic is probably just drumming up the ā€œhate on behringerā€ circle jerk to take attention off them lol

  • @johnfromberkeley said:
    New video: Why Moog Died

    Cool video, I bought a Moog Sub 25 when it came out, Iā€™m already seeing it sell for $1200 new ( $1199 ) up from the $850 I bought it new for, I think itā€™s due more so to inflation than the company being sold at this time. But Iā€™m not gonna lie, I also bought a Behringer Poly D because thereā€™s no way in hell I can afford a real Moog Model D right now. šŸ¤·šŸ½ā€ā™‚ļø

  • @drez said:
    I would buy a Moog DFAM over a Behringer Edge if the DFAM had MIDI. The knobs are waaaay better on the DFAM, like not even close. Build quality...much better. But you'd think, in this day and age, Moog could have added MIDI support. These are the reasons why, imo, Moog is behind. The quality of life additions just aren't there.

    In practice, though, itā€™s less of an issue than youā€™d think, I suspect.

    NB Iā€™m not saying they wouldnā€™t have sold more DFAMs if they had MIDI - Iā€™m sure they would have - but (based on a completely unscientific impression based on YT and IG videos), I doubt most people who own one donā€™t also have other gear able to send analogue clock to it. Such as a Mother-32 or Subharmonicon, or modular, or an SQ-1 or whatever, so you just send MIDI to one of those and clock it from there if you need to sync to a DAW or whatever.

    So, while Iā€™m broadly in agreement with your point - it seems an odd omission, bearing in mind the M32 and SubH both have MIDI - itā€™s not a huge issue in practice. Though it would be if you had a setup that was MIDI right through.

    One argument against MIDI, though, is that you can do interesting things by modulating the clock signal - Iā€™ve no idea how that would integrate with MIDI clock, which seems to be designed to be stubbornly regular.

  • Cvpal clones are an easy and pretty cheap way to give Moog stuff an in to midi but can be a little noisy with the usb port as the power source. Sometimes I just use a TENS unit as a clock source and sync things up by ear when I need my lfos

  • @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

  • @michael_m said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

    The unfortunate thing with youtube is that the algorithm tends to like longer videos. Probably at least partly because they tend to have more ads. Youtube tends to punish people who donā€™t consistently publish their format in a similar style, length etc. i actually much prefer Twitter as a platform currently - much more likelihood that all your kinds of different content get eyes. YouTube restricts written content, polls etc, to your community, for example. I think YouTube is in for a shock regarding how much of its ass is going to get eaten by Twitter if it doesnā€™t up its game. Same with Insta with its absolutely horrendous user experience when crafting posts, lack of basic functionality like clickable links in posts etc. Twitter is the best place to be posting stuff now, hands down, though they also need to deal with bugs, the fact that some Twitter Premium functionality is only available on the desktop site, not on the apps etc. Threads is better than Insta, but it doesnā€™t offer the long form posting or formatting options that Twitter Premium does, and it just died a death very quickly after launch. But yeah, despite a rocky takeover and despite that fact I think he is really an asshole, Elon Musk has made some excellent changes over at Twitter.

  • @michael_m said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

    The title of the video should have been Behringer Bad, letā€™s bash for long timeā€¦.

  • Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

  • @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    Pretty sure he does that for a living so wouldnā€™t make much sense to release a 30 second video. Most YouTubers I follow make longer videos. Hainbach could sum up all his videos in 30 seconds by saying ā€œthis is coolā€ and then playing it for 25 seconds, but seeing 15 minutes of him taking through its paces is part of the fun.

  • @HotStrange said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    Pretty sure he does that for a living so wouldnā€™t make much sense to release a 30 second video. Most YouTubers I follow make longer videos. Hainbach could sum up all his videos in 30 seconds by saying ā€œthis is coolā€ and then playing it for 25 seconds, but seeing 15 minutes of him taking through its paces is part of the fun.

    Thereā€™s a not so subtle difference between a demo and a rant.

  • @Luxthor said:
    Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

    Trial by media is the norm on the Big Brother Channel these days.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @HotStrange said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    Pretty sure he does that for a living so wouldnā€™t make much sense to release a 30 second video. Most YouTubers I follow make longer videos. Hainbach could sum up all his videos in 30 seconds by saying ā€œthis is coolā€ and then playing it for 25 seconds, but seeing 15 minutes of him taking through its paces is part of the fun.

    Thereā€™s a not so subtle difference between a demo and a rant.

    This was not a rant., anyway, anyone, top tip for anyone who doesnā€™t like a YouTuber or other social media influencerā€™s content: donā€™t watch them. Very simple

  • @knewspeak said:

    @Luxthor said:
    Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

    Trial by media is the norm on the Big Brother Channel these days.

    An important role of the media has always been to call things out. Do you think that ā€˜non-mainstreamā€™ media does not hold its own trials? They do. They only cry trial by media when the media happens to be saying something they donā€™t agree with. Otherwise theyā€™re absolutely fine with it. Pure hypocrisy

  • @Gavinski said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @HotStrange said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    Pretty sure he does that for a living so wouldnā€™t make much sense to release a 30 second video. Most YouTubers I follow make longer videos. Hainbach could sum up all his videos in 30 seconds by saying ā€œthis is coolā€ and then playing it for 25 seconds, but seeing 15 minutes of him taking through its paces is part of the fun.

    Thereā€™s a not so subtle difference between a demo and a rant.

    This was not a rant., anyway, anyone, top tip for anyone who doesnā€™t like a YouTuber or other social media influencerā€™s content: donā€™t watch them. Very simple

    You are quite correct, I could cancel them, but thatā€™s not for me, I like to listen to as many possible opinions as I can, gather as many facts as possible, before I form a position. No hypocrisy, no conjecture, just a reasonable formed opinion. If thereā€™s a herd to follow my first question is why.

  • @Gavinski said:

    @michael_m said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

    The unfortunate thing with youtube is that the algorithm tends to like longer videos. Probably at least partly because they tend to have more ads. Youtube tends to punish people who donā€™t consistently publish their format in a similar style, length etc. i actually much prefer Twitter as a platform currently - much more likelihood that all your kinds of different content get eyes. YouTube restricts written content, polls etc, to your community, for example. I think YouTube is in for a shock regarding how much of its ass is going to get eaten by Twitter if it doesnā€™t up its game. Same with Insta with its absolutely horrendous user experience when crafting posts, lack of basic functionality like clickable links in posts etc. Twitter is the best place to be posting stuff now, hands down, though they also need to deal with bugs, the fact that some Twitter Premium functionality is only available on the desktop site, not on the apps etc. Threads is better than Insta, but it doesnā€™t offer the long form posting or formatting options that Twitter Premium does, and it just died a death very quickly after launch. But yeah, despite a rocky takeover and despite that fact I think he is really an asshole, Elon Musk has made some excellent changes over at Twitter.

    Itā€™s not the length of the video as much as how much some creators draw out the length when they donā€™t have enough to say in the time it runs for. Thatā€™s a shame that YouTube encourages this, as for me I would rather see a video based on what the creator thinks is worth saying, and not that plus a lot of padding.

  • @michael_m said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @michael_m said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

    The unfortunate thing with youtube is that the algorithm tends to like longer videos. Probably at least partly because they tend to have more ads. Youtube tends to punish people who donā€™t consistently publish their format in a similar style, length etc. i actually much prefer Twitter as a platform currently - much more likelihood that all your kinds of different content get eyes. YouTube restricts written content, polls etc, to your community, for example. I think YouTube is in for a shock regarding how much of its ass is going to get eaten by Twitter if it doesnā€™t up its game. Same with Insta with its absolutely horrendous user experience when crafting posts, lack of basic functionality like clickable links in posts etc. Twitter is the best place to be posting stuff now, hands down, though they also need to deal with bugs, the fact that some Twitter Premium functionality is only available on the desktop site, not on the apps etc. Threads is better than Insta, but it doesnā€™t offer the long form posting or formatting options that Twitter Premium does, and it just died a death very quickly after launch. But yeah, despite a rocky takeover and despite that fact I think he is really an asshole, Elon Musk has made some excellent changes over at Twitter.

    Itā€™s not the length of the video as much as how much some creators draw out the length when they donā€™t have enough to say in the time it runs for. Thatā€™s a shame that YouTube encourages this, as for me I would rather see a video based on what the creator thinks is worth saying, and not that plus a lot of padding.

    Thatā€™s another way of defining - a rant.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @michael_m said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @michael_m said:

    @wim said:
    Too long. Coulda been summed up in a few paragraphs.
    I did make it about 2/3 of the way through. But otherwise a great waste of time.
    Well done I suppose, but I just donā€™t have the patience to slog through the rest. How do you guys stand plodding through 18:50 minutes to absorb what could be communicated in under 30 seconds? šŸ˜‚šŸ˜¬

    Likable and well spoken guy though, and do find myself entertained for awhile wondering what happened to that left eyebrow.

    You made it further than me. He does seem likable and articulate, but I wish he would get to the point.

    I feel like that about a lot of YouTube videos though - creators talk a lot but donā€™t really get round to actually saying very much.

    The unfortunate thing with youtube is that the algorithm tends to like longer videos. Probably at least partly because they tend to have more ads. Youtube tends to punish people who donā€™t consistently publish their format in a similar style, length etc. i actually much prefer Twitter as a platform currently - much more likelihood that all your kinds of different content get eyes. YouTube restricts written content, polls etc, to your community, for example. I think YouTube is in for a shock regarding how much of its ass is going to get eaten by Twitter if it doesnā€™t up its game. Same with Insta with its absolutely horrendous user experience when crafting posts, lack of basic functionality like clickable links in posts etc. Twitter is the best place to be posting stuff now, hands down, though they also need to deal with bugs, the fact that some Twitter Premium functionality is only available on the desktop site, not on the apps etc. Threads is better than Insta, but it doesnā€™t offer the long form posting or formatting options that Twitter Premium does, and it just died a death very quickly after launch. But yeah, despite a rocky takeover and despite that fact I think he is really an asshole, Elon Musk has made some excellent changes over at Twitter.

    Itā€™s not the length of the video as much as how much some creators draw out the length when they donā€™t have enough to say in the time it runs for. Thatā€™s a shame that YouTube encourages this, as for me I would rather see a video based on what the creator thinks is worth saying, and not that plus a lot of padding.

    Thatā€™s another way of defining - a rant.

    Sure, if you like to define it that way.

  • @Luxthor said:
    Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

    I disagree. Vid is basically shaming people that bought Behringer clones at Ā£300 rather then the Ā£5000 for the Moog equivalent. Pretty horrible stuff really.

  • @cyberheater said:

    @Luxthor said:
    Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

    I disagree. Vid is basically shaming people that bought Behringer clones at Ā£300 rather then the Ā£5000 for the Moog equivalent. Pretty horrible stuff really.

    I didnā€™t watch the video but as someone who bought the Boog over the Moog because I could never afford it even in a dream, his shaming would be pretty ineffective on me unless he wants to help pay my bills

  • Moog is a 1 trick pony and hasnt done anything remotely interesting since 2002.
    Yeah.. you got a ladder filter. How long you gonna ride that wave?

  • @cyberheater said:

    @Luxthor said:
    Audiobus forum on Benā€™s video.

    I disagree. Vid is basically shaming people that bought Behringer clones at Ā£300 rather then the Ā£5000 for the Moog equivalent. Pretty horrible stuff really.

    I didnā€™t watch the whole video, this thing is terrible if you speak the truth. Everything around us is basically a copy of something else, even the universe. ;)

Sign In or Register to comment.