BM3. Man I miss this and need to revisit it.

hansjbs

@el_bo said:

@hansjbs said:

@el_bo said:

@BroCoast said:

@klownshed said:
If I want BM3s sampler as an auv3 I’m very aware of why I’d want it and how I’d use it. I’m also aware of what it couldn’t do without the rest of BM3. But guess what. I don’t want those bits.

Yep, I think it’s clear most of us want the “instrument” part as an AUv3. It doesn’t require the other components to function that way.

And some of us want both

Would be curious to know the kinds of numbers (of users) such an expansion/option would bring in.

Not much at all. I don’t think many understands how many people use BM3 and are happy with it. I didn’t understand/believe either until maybe a couple years back.

BM3 did very well for the developers and continues to do well. Heck it’s been doing pretty well since version 2 so with that, it’s best to wish/get another developer to create that auv3 sampler.

This is the second time you've made claims about potential/actual market share (Serato and BM), without providing any actual proof. I did ask for data to support your contention that I was one of only a few people who preferred using 'Sample' in my go-to DAW, but you've yet to answer. Now you are asserting "Not much at all" in response to my wondering about how many currently non-BM customers an AUv3 option would attract. So, I'll ask again for some proof for your claims.

There's nothing wrong with speculation. That's what we're doing in this thread - speculating, throwing around ideas etc. And if you want to say that you "don't think" there's a potential market, then that's all good. But if you're making absolute claims then please provide proof.

Thanks.

You don’t have to believe anything I say or take anything I say seriously and I don’t have to provide any actual proof or data to support anything. I was just giving insight since I’ve been beta testing these products for years.

Anyways I think I’ve said too much in here sooooooo……✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾

el_bo

@hansjbs said:

@el_bo said:

@hansjbs said:

@el_bo said:

@BroCoast said:

@klownshed said:
If I want BM3s sampler as an auv3 I’m very aware of why I’d want it and how I’d use it. I’m also aware of what it couldn’t do without the rest of BM3. But guess what. I don’t want those bits.

Yep, I think it’s clear most of us want the “instrument” part as an AUv3. It doesn’t require the other components to function that way.

And some of us want both

Would be curious to know the kinds of numbers (of users) such an expansion/option would bring in.

Not much at all. I don’t think many understands how many people use BM3 and are happy with it. I didn’t understand/believe either until maybe a couple years back.

BM3 did very well for the developers and continues to do well. Heck it’s been doing pretty well since version 2 so with that, it’s best to wish/get another developer to create that auv3 sampler.

This is the second time you've made claims about potential/actual market share (Serato and BM), without providing any actual proof. I did ask for data to support your contention that I was one of only a few people who preferred using 'Sample' in my go-to DAW, but you've yet to answer. Now you are asserting "Not much at all" in response to my wondering about how many currently non-BM customers an AUv3 option would attract. So, I'll ask again for some proof for your claims.

There's nothing wrong with speculation. That's what we're doing in this thread - speculating, throwing around ideas etc. And if you want to say that you "don't think" there's a potential market, then that's all good. But if you're making absolute claims then please provide proof.

Thanks.

You don’t have to believe anything I say or take anything I say seriously and I don’t have to provide any actual proof or data to support anything. I was just giving insight since I’ve been beta testing these products for years.

Anyways I think I’ve said too much in here sooooooo……✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾✌🏾

Ah yes...the insights

But don't sweat it. I'll go.