Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Searching for the best cello

124

Comments

  • Knowing people that work on hardware design at Apple, a lot of design decision on iPads and iPhones are based on how to make devices as compact as possible and robust and drop resistant and how to achieve battery-life/performance balances for good user experience….mixed in with production economy.

    I have zero insight on the headphone port decision. But have heard discussions about the battery issue.

  • edited July 2023

    @Gavinski said:

    @NeuM said:

    @espiegel123 said:
    @NeuM: Why nope? Nothing in that linked article contradicts what I posted. That post is about replacing batteries in devices designed to not be user-servicable. It has nothing to do with whether devices designed to have user replaceable batteries are inherently prone to issues. My comment had to do with the latter. Perhaps I was not clear.

    Let me restate: if a device is designed to have user-replaceable batteries that does not mean it will be prone to issues of expanding batteries, etc.

    Trying to replace batteries in products like an iPhone or iPad that are designed to NOT be user-serviceable is prone to problems.

    You said "Apple does it to create the smallest possible package."

    While that might be a secondary effect of eliminating a user replaceable battery, it's not their stated primary reason.

    Frankly, I would be careful of trusting what their ‘stated’ reasons for anything are. Their motives are usually their own profit above anything, but that’s hardly the way they’re going to market new product launches, or things like removing the headphone socket.

    The motive of every business is to make a profit. That's a given. When a business places making a profit above any benefit to their customers, they won't be around long. That's not the Apple of today, nor was it (entirely) the Apple of Steve Jobs. Remember Michael Spindler? Gil Amelio? They were terrible for both Apple and their customers.

    Anyway, back to the thread...

  • edited July 2023

    @Edward_Alexander said:
    My go to for realistic cello is the GeoSWAM cello in GeoShred. The standalone SWAM Cello app has many more options from what I can see, but to me, the GeoSWAM version sounds so good, that I’ve never had a need, nor an urge to purchase anything else.

    I honestly don’t think I’ll EVER need to buy another “Cello” app. GeoSWAM Cello = cello shopping done!

    There’s a handful of other GeoSWAM instruments I feel the same way about also, and that’s the GeoSWAM violin, and my single most favorite iPadOS solo instrument of all time; my trusty GeoSWAM Tenor Saxophone 🎷

    Now string sections where you’d have multiple string instrument ensembles, and/or full orchestra string sections, there may be better options, but for solo instruments, GeoSWAM is the way to go. This is all of course, in my personal opinion. I’ve made my recommendations.

    I have to agree with you about GEOSWAM Tenor Sax.
    I never use GeoShred for “shredding” or making other pseudo-guitar sounds (except for the feedback sometimes)
    The app is on my devices just so I can have access to that honking, squealing, growling thing of beauty!

  • Much off-topic in this thread…

  • @ErrkaPetti said:
    Much off-topic in this thread…

    We're getting it back on topic! Let's go!

  • @Gavinski, are these Advanced functions on iOS SWAM instruments still locked?

  • @Luxthor said:
    @Gavinski, are these Advanced functions on iOS SWAM instruments still locked?

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

  • @Gavinski said:

    @Luxthor said:
    @Gavinski, are these Advanced functions on iOS SWAM instruments still locked?

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Great, thank you! 🤩

  • @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

  • @unlink said:

    @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

  • @Zerozerozero said:

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

    Gav said in the video that they wanted to sell this as IAP at some point.

  • @Zerozerozero said:

    @unlink said:

    @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

    Probably because it’s impossible to take the same high price on iPad as on desktop…

    Just now there’s also campaign from SWAM, $20 each for all instruments on iPad…

  • @Zerozerozero said:

    @unlink said:

    @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

    Have you confirmed that changing the exposed parameters actually affects things?

  • @espiegel123 said:

    @Zerozerozero said:

    @unlink said:

    @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

    Have you confirmed that changing the exposed parameters actually affects things?

    I can confirm that we can automate locked parameters and have actual effect - tested in Logic Pro…

  • Changing the exposed parameters via midi does affect things and it works, and always has done since release, in all the audio modeling apps.

  • @espiegel123 said:

    @Zerozerozero said:

    @unlink said:

    @Gavinski said:

    Yes, but the parameters are exposed to auv3 hosts so you can still manipulate these via midi 😉

    Wow really? You can change the parameters which are locked via AUv3? Does this works for any SWAM instrument? (cannot test it right now)

    Only have viola but yes, params exposed in AUM. Didn’t know that so good news but don’t understand why locked in app?

    Have you confirmed that changing the exposed parameters actually affects things?

    Tried a random few and couldn’t tell any difference but tbh there’s some unlocked ones like that also. User error probably. Will take others word for it.

  • Guys don’t kill me, but those unlocked controls are already too much for what I need, as it is for now, only sky's the limit. ;)

    But those Advanced controls; Release Time, Dynamic Pitch, Auto Expression, etc. will be the only obstacle for my set of preferred fx’s. So they will probably stay intact anyway.

  • The unlocked advanced controls are already more than most people need. These things are making very, very subtle differences for the most part. I fiddle with them on the standalones just because I can. But the truth is, the basic preset version in Geoshred is usually just exactly right 99% of the time.

  • edited July 2023

    The unlocked controls aren’t just exposed in AUM, but they are also assignable to a controller in the midi table within the SWAM app itself. With sax: flutter tongue, harmonic structure and formant mobs are greyed out, but can still be assigned to a controller. These screen shots are on my iPhone, so it looks a bit different.


  • @Clueless said:
    I am also a fan of Finger Fiddle....sadly it never was further developed to the potential it has (just my meaning).
    Otherwise SWAM it is. I normally prefer sample libraries because you REALLY have to use the right controllers and/or the right midi settings/automations plus the right reverb/spatialization to make SWAM really sound pleasing and realistic.
    That is the thing.There are some awesome demos out there where it sounds amazing but i think it is really almost as hard as learning a real new instrument to play it the perfect way.
    Something like Bohemian Cello (my favourite on mac) would be great to have on iOS but so far SWAM is the best option i think.
    Oh and i really still think ThumbJam is very usable and especially it has still one if the best ways to control the sound in interesting ways.
    So with samples you always have a style from the artist in there with physical modelling you could make it complete your own way but as said it is almost as you have to learn to play a real cello.

    The cello samples in ThumbJam were recorded by Zoe Keating ( https://zoekeating.com ), and her expression really made it special... still holds up after all these years. Maybe one day I'll do a more detailed version of just that.

    If you have an expressive controller, using one of the modeled instruments (SWAM etc), is definitely the way to go though...

  • @sonosaurus said:

    @Clueless said:
    I am also a fan of Finger Fiddle....sadly it never was further developed to the potential it has (just my meaning).
    Otherwise SWAM it is. I normally prefer sample libraries because you REALLY have to use the right controllers and/or the right midi settings/automations plus the right reverb/spatialization to make SWAM really sound pleasing and realistic.
    That is the thing.There are some awesome demos out there where it sounds amazing but i think it is really almost as hard as learning a real new instrument to play it the perfect way.
    Something like Bohemian Cello (my favourite on mac) would be great to have on iOS but so far SWAM is the best option i think.
    Oh and i really still think ThumbJam is very usable and especially it has still one if the best ways to control the sound in interesting ways.
    So with samples you always have a style from the artist in there with physical modelling you could make it complete your own way but as said it is almost as you have to learn to play a real cello.

    The cello samples in ThumbJam were recorded by Zoe Keating ( https://zoekeating.com ), and her expression really made it special... still holds up after all these years. Maybe one day I'll do a more detailed version of just that.

    If you have an expressive controller, using one of the modeled instruments (SWAM etc), is definitely the way to go though...

    The strings in ThumbJam are ace. Very good job. Layering together with just one instance of a Swam instrument can sound really good to my ears.

  • @sonosaurus said:

    @Clueless said:
    I am also a fan of Finger Fiddle....sadly it never was further developed to the potential it has (just my meaning).
    Otherwise SWAM it is. I normally prefer sample libraries because you REALLY have to use the right controllers and/or the right midi settings/automations plus the right reverb/spatialization to make SWAM really sound pleasing and realistic.
    That is the thing.There are some awesome demos out there where it sounds amazing but i think it is really almost as hard as learning a real new instrument to play it the perfect way.
    Something like Bohemian Cello (my favourite on mac) would be great to have on iOS but so far SWAM is the best option i think.
    Oh and i really still think ThumbJam is very usable and especially it has still one if the best ways to control the sound in interesting ways.
    So with samples you always have a style from the artist in there with physical modelling you could make it complete your own way but as said it is almost as you have to learn to play a real cello.

    The cello samples in ThumbJam were recorded by Zoe Keating ( https://zoekeating.com ), and her expression really made it special... still holds up after all these years. Maybe one day I'll do a more detailed version of just that.

    If you have an expressive controller, using one of the modeled instruments (SWAM etc), is definitely the way to go though...

    It’s great to see the legendary @sonosaurus is still around on this forum!

    Yeah, the cello in Thumbjam is really good, and, many other instruments on this classic app…

  • @FriedTapeworm said:
    The unlocked controls aren’t just exposed in AUM, but they are also assignable to a controller in the midi table within the SWAM app itself. With sax: flutter tongue, harmonic structure and formant mobs are greyed out, but can still be assigned to a controller. These screen shots are on my iPhone, so it looks a bit different.


    Yes, locked SWAM parameters aren’t available only in AUv3 mode. You just need to assign CC mapping as you wish from MIDI IN events.

    By the way, just to let you know that advanced parameters in GEOSWAM were also available by “simply” tweaking the XML preset file. These parameters were hidden in the UI but perfectly accessible in the XML.
    Well, that was only until the last version. The dev seems to have fixed this backdoor hack.

  • @sonosaurus said:
    The cello samples in ThumbJam were recorded by Zoe Keating ( https://zoekeating.com ), and her expression really made it special... still holds up after all these years. Maybe one day I'll do a more detailed version of just that.

    If you have an expressive controller, using one of the modeled instruments (SWAM etc), is definitely the way to go though...

    No wonder thumb-cello is my fav. Zoe Keating’s music is amazing!
    I tried SWAM, but need so much more practice to make it sound like a beginner cello player :D

  • @Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredr said:
    The unlocked advanced controls are already more than most people need. These things are making very, very subtle differences for the most part. I fiddle with them on the standalones just because I can. But the truth is, the basic preset version in Geoshred is usually just exactly right 99% of the time.

    Appreciate this info. Thought my ears were shot (I did test on earbuds on a train as an excuse!) 🙏🏻

  • @Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredr said:
    The unlocked advanced controls are already more than most people need. These things are making very, very subtle differences for the most part. I fiddle with them on the standalones just because I can. But the truth is, the basic preset version in Geoshred is usually just exactly right 99% of the time.

    Can’t agree that locked parameters in the SWAM instruments leave a subtle changed in the instrument sound…

    As an example, SWAM Clarinet has Flutter locked, and when automate this that’s a huge difference in sound with full flutter…

    The same goes for many other instruments and locked parameters…

  • @ErrkaPetti said:
    Can’t agree that locked parameters in the SWAM instruments leave a subtle changed in the instrument sound…

    As an example, SWAM Clarinet has Flutter locked, and when automate this that’s a huge difference in sound with full flutter…

    The same goes for many other instruments and locked parameters…

    I agree. Yesterday I tried "Vibrato Fade In" and "Dynamic Transitions" on Cello and they were pretty useful and not really that subtle. Not all have big impact on the final output but some are definitely not useless.

  • edited July 2023

    @unlink said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    Can’t agree that locked parameters in the SWAM instruments leave a subtle changed in the instrument sound…

    As an example, SWAM Clarinet has Flutter locked, and when automate this that’s a huge difference in sound with full flutter…

    The same goes for many other instruments and locked parameters…

    I agree. Yesterday I tried "Vibrato Fade In" and "Dynamic Transitions" on Cello and they were pretty useful and not really that subtle. Not all have big impact on the final output but some are definitely not useless.

    Flutter is on the other end indeed. It’s an extreme effect that I don’t like. It’s available in the GeoShred version for less money. I didn't realize the standalones don't offer it. Maybe a good argument for buying the GS version instead.

    I have not used vibrato fade in because I prefer playing the vibrato myself.

    What does dynamic transitions do? I don’t have that one.

  • @unlink said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    Can’t agree that locked parameters in the SWAM instruments leave a subtle changed in the instrument sound…

    As an example, SWAM Clarinet has Flutter locked, and when automate this that’s a huge difference in sound with full flutter…

    The same goes for many other instruments and locked parameters…

    I agree. Yesterday I tried "Vibrato Fade In" and "Dynamic Transitions" on Cello and they were pretty useful and not really that subtle. Not all have big impact on the final output but some are definitely not useless.

    Do you have Viola? I’m testing on iPhone and vibrato fade in seems to do nothing…

  • To answer the initial question, we forgot to mention Tomofon from Klevgrand :

Sign In or Register to comment.