Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

EG Nodes

1…89111314…42

Comments

  • wimwim

    @Carnbot said:
    I'm finding that miRack is my most performance friendly modular AU host for now, hope the others catch up soon :)

    So you've actually enabled the multi DSP threads setting? I haven't tried that one as I haven't needed to, but I'm curious.

  • CarnbotCarnbot

    @wim said:

    @Carnbot said:
    I'm finding that miRack is my most performance friendly modular AU host for now, hope the others catch up soon :)

    So you've actually enabled the multi DSP threads setting? I haven't tried that one as I haven't needed to, but I'm curious.

    Yeah I've been using the AU hosting with it and can use the 3 threads setting but can't use 4 threads setting on my iPad

  • 5k31055k3105

    @HotStrange said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:
    The thing about the 4 bars… it’s never been an issue for me. Granted, I’m more of a soundscaping abstract experimenter.

    If I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add another scene on the node.

    I also played/recorded notes using the Atom 2 app in a midi fx node. That worked well, but occasionally I’d find myself bumping Atom up to 5 bars.

    I suppose it depends on how you use the app. The flow is kinda different in Nodes.

    I’m sure there are some who’d actually use 16bars in the piano roll, but it doesn’t seem to fit with the elegant and efficient overall Nodes interface.

    Personally, if I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add a midi fx node and use a full piano roll app like Atom 2 or one of the other dozens of piano roll apps out there.

    I think people should simply sit tight on the additional requests until they’ve actually used the app a few days and know for sure they feel something is lacking.

    This dev could cram everything but the kitchen sink into Nodes in an effort to appease every desire, but then he’d risk destroying the beautiful overall interface design… to the point that it’d no longer be such a joy to use.

    Its like… one feature request. Not a kitchen sink.

    How does adding additional options in a drop down affect interface design?

    An option to increase bar length is gonna destroy the app for you huh? No more joy? Wow lol

    Have a great day and a very happy new year. I wish you joy and great luck in the future. :)

    Nice try

    Think you may need to clock out for the day lol

    Come to rescue your test team mate? Talk about hive mind and conformity of opinion in small groups

    You whatevers win! Nodes is perfect! Im convinced. Thanks for setting me straight

  • skiphuntskiphunt
    edited January 5

    @5k3105 said:

    @HotStrange said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:
    The thing about the 4 bars… it’s never been an issue for me. Granted, I’m more of a soundscaping abstract experimenter.

    If I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add another scene on the node.

    I also played/recorded notes using the Atom 2 app in a midi fx node. That worked well, but occasionally I’d find myself bumping Atom up to 5 bars.

    I suppose it depends on how you use the app. The flow is kinda different in Nodes.

    I’m sure there are some who’d actually use 16bars in the piano roll, but it doesn’t seem to fit with the elegant and efficient overall Nodes interface.

    Personally, if I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add a midi fx node and use a full piano roll app like Atom 2 or one of the other dozens of piano roll apps out there.

    I think people should simply sit tight on the additional requests until they’ve actually used the app a few days and know for sure they feel something is lacking.

    This dev could cram everything but the kitchen sink into Nodes in an effort to appease every desire, but then he’d risk destroying the beautiful overall interface design… to the point that it’d no longer be such a joy to use.

    Its like… one feature request. Not a kitchen sink.

    How does adding additional options in a drop down affect interface design?

    An option to increase bar length is gonna destroy the app for you huh? No more joy? Wow lol

    Have a great day and a very happy new year. I wish you joy and great luck in the future. :)

    Nice try

    Think you may need to clock out for the day lol

    Come to rescue your test team mate? Talk about hive mind and conformity of opinion in small groups

    You whatevers win! Nodes is perfect! Im convinced. Thanks for setting me straight

    @5k3105 You seem angry and to be more interested in picking fights than chatting about audio apps.

    I see you just joined in November. Former "deleted user" perhaps? ;)

    All I did was suggest users wait until the app launches before they start requesting changes. I said it's a great app that I bet people are going to dig. I said that although I personally don't need more than 4 bars, that there are likely others who'd make good use of it.

    That's it. Not sure what you seem to be upset and/or angry about, but if something unfortunate is going on in your life that's causing you to feel compelled to argue and have a negative attitude in general, then I hope the future is kinder toward you.

    Buy the app or don't buy the app, makes no difference to me. I'm not the developer. If the developer decides his user base would be better served with all the various changes suggested, so be it. It's up to the developer.

    I personally love the app. I think it's well designed, and has an elegant balance overall between interface and functionality. It would be a shame if the developer felt compelled to accommodate every request at the risk of possibly destroying the current overall design balance and flow. This developer is skilled at making stuff work efficiently and with (so far) avoiding app bloat.

    Best of luck to you and if you decide to purchase Nodes for yourself, I hope you enjoy using it as much as I have. :)

  • 5k31055k3105

    @skiphunt said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @HotStrange said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:

    @5k3105 said:

    @skiphunt said:
    The thing about the 4 bars… it’s never been an issue for me. Granted, I’m more of a soundscaping abstract experimenter.

    If I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add another scene on the node.

    I also played/recorded notes using the Atom 2 app in a midi fx node. That worked well, but occasionally I’d find myself bumping Atom up to 5 bars.

    I suppose it depends on how you use the app. The flow is kinda different in Nodes.

    I’m sure there are some who’d actually use 16bars in the piano roll, but it doesn’t seem to fit with the elegant and efficient overall Nodes interface.

    Personally, if I ever needed more than 4 bars, I’d just add a midi fx node and use a full piano roll app like Atom 2 or one of the other dozens of piano roll apps out there.

    I think people should simply sit tight on the additional requests until they’ve actually used the app a few days and know for sure they feel something is lacking.

    This dev could cram everything but the kitchen sink into Nodes in an effort to appease every desire, but then he’d risk destroying the beautiful overall interface design… to the point that it’d no longer be such a joy to use.

    Its like… one feature request. Not a kitchen sink.

    How does adding additional options in a drop down affect interface design?

    An option to increase bar length is gonna destroy the app for you huh? No more joy? Wow lol

    Have a great day and a very happy new year. I wish you joy and great luck in the future. :)

    Nice try

    Think you may need to clock out for the day lol

    Come to rescue your test team mate? Talk about hive mind and conformity of opinion in small groups

    You whatevers win! Nodes is perfect! Im convinced. Thanks for setting me straight

    @5k3105 You seem angry and to be more interested in picking fights that chatting about audio apps.

    I see you just joined in November. Former "deleted user" perhaps? ;)

    All I did was suggest users wait until the app launches before they start requesting changes. I said it's a great app that I bet people are going to dig. I said that although I personally don't need more than 4 bars, that there are likely others who'd make good use of it.

    That's it. Not sure what you seem to be upset and/or angry about, but if something unfortunate is going on in your life that's causing you to feel compelled to argue and have a negative attitude in general, then I hope the future is kinder toward you.

    Buy the app or don't buy the app, makes no difference to me. I'm not the developer. If the developer decides his user base would be better served with all the various changes suggested, so be it. It's up to the developer.

    I personally love the app. I think it's well designed, and has an elegant balance overall between interface and functionality. It would be a shame if the developer felt compelled to accommodate every request at the risk of possibly destroying the current overall design balance and flow. This developer is skilled at making stuff work efficiently and with (so far) avoiding app bloat.

    Best of luck to you and if you decide to purchase Nodes for yourself, I hope you enjoy using it as much as I have. :)

    Im not going to read all this, but stop talking to me thanks

  • wimwim
    edited January 5

    @5k3105 said:
    Im not going to read all this, but stop talking to me thanks

    The forum has an ignore function if that helps. It's not reasonable to expect people to keep mental lists in their heads as to who not to "talk" to, so you might find some usefulness for that function if you're sensitive to people who speak their mind. Just click on the user name, then the little "person" icon and you should get the ignore popup. 👍🏼

  • 5k31055k3105
    edited January 5

    @wim said:

    @5k3105 said:
    Im not going to read all this, but stop talking to me thanks

    The forum does have an ignore function if that helps. It's not reasonable to expect people to keep mental lists in their heads as to who not to "talk" to, so you might find some usefulness for that function if you're sensitive to people who speak their mind. Just click on the user name and you should see the ignore function. 👍🏼

    Oh wait. You must be a former deleted user too. Just speaking my mind wink

  • wimwim
    edited January 5

    @5k3105 said:
    Oh wait. You must be a former deleted user too. Just speaking my mind wink

    Well yes I can see why that bit pushed your buttons. Seriously though, the ignore feature could be useful. You'll no doubt want to use it on me at some point, and I would highly encourage it. 😉

  • 5k31055k3105

    @wim said:

    @5k3105 said:
    Oh wait. You must be a former deleted user too. Just speaking my mind wink

    Well yes, that bit was indeed a little insulting. Seriously though, the ignore feature could be useful. You'll probably want to use it on me at some point, and I would highly encourage it. 😉

    Im a big fan of Russia, if that’ll help!

  • wimwim
    edited January 5

    If forum members start unexplainably falling out of windows, at least we'll know who to blame.

  • 5k31055k3105

    Lol

  • michael_mmichael_m

    @wim said:
    If forum members start unexplainably falling out of windows, at least we'll know who to blame.

    Not me, I’m a Mac guy.

  • Blipsford_BaubieBlipsford_Baubie

    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

  • gregsmithgregsmith

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    It goes down to 20.9 bpm in standalone. Is that good?

  • ElliottGarageElliottGarage

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    each node has indipependant speed rate that goes form x4 to /8. So if you set it to /8 and have 4 bars it plays a duration of 32 bars.

  • slaqslaq

    Great groove box concept. Thanks for universal support. I’m highly excited to try. Preordered!

  • RajahPRajahP
    edited January 6

    So, did EG NODE kill Ampify Groove Box?

    2 more Sleep.

  • 5k31055k3105

    No song mode? Very limited

  • gregsmithgregsmith

    @RajahP said:
    So, did EG NODE kill Ampify Groove Box?

    2 more Sleep.

    Ampify doesn’t host auv3’s and it isn’t hostable, so doesn’t really compare.

    I don’t even think of this as a groovebox. As a midi sequencer hosted in AUM, or Loopy Pro etc, it’s like all the best types of sequencer in one simple app.

    I’ve still not really scratched the surface of the features either - eg. only just found out about the speed feature of each node which will make the ambient guys happy.

  • Blipsford_BaubieBlipsford_Baubie

    @gregsmith said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    It goes down to 20.9 bpm in standalone. Is that good?

    @ElliottGarage said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    each node has indipependant speed rate that goes form x4 to /8. So if you set it to /8 and have 4 bars it plays a duration of 32 bars.

    👍👍
    Thanks. And each node can have different lengths?
    From the portions of videos I’ve watched so far, although completely different in comparison, Nodes reminds me a lot of how I like to work inside Drambo:
    Layers Module hosting multiple parallel Instruments Racks, each with their own decoupled sequencers.
    Not planning on preordering , unless this is an introductory price and also the nodes also have decoupled lengths.
    Either way, this looks like a beautiful UX @ElliottGarage

  • ElliottGarageElliottGarage

    Yes each node may have a different length and yes it's an introductory price that will increase after the release :)

  • jobeatsjobeats

    Assuming I have an 8 bar loop at 160bpm that I need to import into an EG Nodes project that I am working on also at 160 bpm. How will I align that 8 bar loop to fit the project tempo, considering the 4 bars and also the method of halving and speeding node lengths? I hope this makes sense

  • gregsmithgregsmith

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:

    @gregsmith said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    It goes down to 20.9 bpm in standalone. Is that good?

    @ElliottGarage said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    each node has indipependant speed rate that goes form x4 to /8. So if you set it to /8 and have 4 bars it plays a duration of 32 bars.

    👍👍
    Thanks. And each node can have different lengths?
    From the portions of videos I’ve watched so far, although completely different in comparison, Nodes reminds me a lot of how I like to work inside Drambo:
    Layers Module hosting multiple parallel Instruments Racks, each with their own decoupled sequencers.
    Not planning on preordering , unless this is an introductory price and also the nodes also have decoupled lengths.
    Either way, this looks like a beautiful UX @ElliottGarage

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:

    @gregsmith said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    It goes down to 20.9 bpm in standalone. Is that good?

    @ElliottGarage said:

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    If I recall correctly, EG was the one who chimed that the clocks can go really slow.
    Since the sequencers can have independent times or whatever, can any beta users tell me if the clocks are slow enough for a faux 24 bars of 6/8 over the course of 4 bars?

    each node has indipependant speed rate that goes form x4 to /8. So if you set it to /8 and have 4 bars it plays a duration of 32 bars.

    👍👍
    Thanks. And each node can have different lengths?
    From the portions of videos I’ve watched so far, although completely different in comparison, Nodes reminds me a lot of how I like to work inside Drambo:
    Layers Module hosting multiple parallel Instruments Racks, each with their own decoupled sequencers.
    Not planning on preordering , unless this is an introductory price and also the nodes also have decoupled lengths.
    Either way, this looks like a beautiful UX @ElliottGarage

    It’s not just every node, it’s every scene (pattern) within every node. Not just that, each scene can have a different amount of swing etc.

  • RajahPRajahP

    @gregsmith said:

    @RajahP said:
    So, did EG NODE kill Ampify Groove Box?

    2 more Sleep.

    Ampify doesn’t host auv3’s and it isn’t hostable, so doesn’t really compare.

    I don’t even think of this as a groovebox. As a midi sequencer hosted in AUM, or Loopy Pro etc, it’s like all the best types of sequencer in one simple app.

    I’ve still not really scratched the surface of the features either - eg. only just found out about the speed feature of each node which will make the ambient guys happy.

    But for what it does. Node seems to do it better and is Auv3..

  • Blipsford_BaubieBlipsford_Baubie

    @gregsmith said:
    It’s not just every node, it’s every scene (pattern) within every node. Not just that, each scene can have a different amount of swing etc.

    Oh yeah. Just preordered. I’ll no doubt play in stand alone at first, but I’m also excited to see what it’ll be like to have Drambo host the AU3 MIDI Processor version Nodes.
    Since I already love using Tonality Pads inside Drambo, just yaye.

  • Blipsford_BaubieBlipsford_Baubie

    Ciao Andrea.
    I found your roadmap, but for reporting bugs in the future, will [email protected] be the most efficient place for you?

  • ElliottGarageElliottGarage

    @Blipsford_Baubie said:
    Ciao Andrea.
    I found your roadmap, but for reporting bugs in the future, will [email protected] be the most efficient place for you?

    Thanks for the preorder. Yes email is good, or I will make public the EG Nodes discord channel

  • oddSTARoddSTAR

    Pre-ordering now! Thank you @ElliottGarage , I’m a fan of your work. Look forward to checking this out.

  • Morgman73Morgman73

    I’m in. Preordering now. Was really trying to not make any iOS purchases but this is looking like a perfect sequencer for outboard? I’ve used it all but I’m hoping this will keep me in iosland. Looking forward to Nodes.

  • RajahPRajahP

    Preordered…. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/eg-nodes/id6466639463

    Looking forward… Thanks..

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2024