Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Audiobus is going to a new home! Forum is staying

14567810»

Comments

  • Perhaps the complete history of the forum isn’t known and does seem strange to some. I’m not going to recap it here as I wasn’t here from the start but going forward…we’re all here despite it being the Audiobus forum and I gather it’s not the most used app by many here (I have never used it).
    Micheal allowed us all to discuss all mobile (and desktop) music and related apps. His money, his time, his forum, his gift to us.
    Does it really matter if it’s called after another of his apps? He’s still decent enough to let us talk about the rest.

    I still think it should be the glass tappers and knob twiddlers forum but I have an odd sense of humour.

  • I understand. Thanks for the background info. It’s not something I feel strongly about.

  • @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:
    Just chipping in here. Most of the content on this (really highly valued) site is about iPad apps and music making in general rather than Audiobus specifically. Presumably this is just a historical accident? However, if the new forum is named after Loopy Pro we will be deliberately recreating that historical accident for no obvious reason!

    Wouldn't it make sense to have a forum referencing Loopy Pro that was actually for specifically discussing Loopy Pro (which I assume would be both desirable and beneficial to it's users) and a separate forum for iPad apps and music making more generally. MagicMusicBus as suggested by @NeuM or something similar? The separate site could have a permanent link/pinned post on Loopy Pro to support @Michael's business model etc

    So, you’re suggesting that, as well as being kind enough to pay for this forum to be hosted, Michael should also pay for a separate Loopy Pro forum?

    ‘Deliberately recreating that historical accident’ could just as easily be ‘honoring the site’s origins’, couldn’t it?

    Must admit I hadn't really thought about the cost implications. Obviously I don't know the details of that. I was just thinking from a 'rational' point of view in terms of the name but if there are significant cost implications for Michael maybe that should, as you say, be the determining factor. It's just that the way the question was originally posed was open-ended and Michaal appeared to be actively looking for suggestions.

  • And a surprising amount of people were taken in by that devious double bluff 😉

  • @charalew said:

    @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:
    Just chipping in here. Most of the content on this (really highly valued) site is about iPad apps and music making in general rather than Audiobus specifically. Presumably this is just a historical accident? However, if the new forum is named after Loopy Pro we will be deliberately recreating that historical accident for no obvious reason!

    Wouldn't it make sense to have a forum referencing Loopy Pro that was actually for specifically discussing Loopy Pro (which I assume would be both desirable and beneficial to it's users) and a separate forum for iPad apps and music making more generally. MagicMusicBus as suggested by @NeuM or something similar? The separate site could have a permanent link/pinned post on Loopy Pro to support @Michael's business model etc

    So, you’re suggesting that, as well as being kind enough to pay for this forum to be hosted, Michael should also pay for a separate Loopy Pro forum?

    ‘Deliberately recreating that historical accident’ could just as easily be ‘honoring the site’s origins’, couldn’t it?

    Must admit I hadn't really thought about the cost implications. Obviously I don't know the details of that. I was just thinking from a 'rational' point of view in terms of the name but if there are significant cost implications for Michael maybe that should, as you say, be the determining factor. It's just that the way the question was originally posed was open-ended and Michaal appeared to be actively looking for suggestions.

    Naturally, i don’t know the details about the costs involved either but i figure it has to cost more to have two websites rather than one!

    By the way, Michael explains his decision for the name on page 8 of this thread.

  • @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:

    @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:
    Just chipping in here. Most of the content on this (really highly valued) site is about iPad apps and music making in general rather than Audiobus specifically. Presumably this is just a historical accident? However, if the new forum is named after Loopy Pro we will be deliberately recreating that historical accident for no obvious reason!

    Wouldn't it make sense to have a forum referencing Loopy Pro that was actually for specifically discussing Loopy Pro (which I assume would be both desirable and beneficial to it's users) and a separate forum for iPad apps and music making more generally. MagicMusicBus as suggested by @NeuM or something similar? The separate site could have a permanent link/pinned post on Loopy Pro to support @Michael's business model etc

    So, you’re suggesting that, as well as being kind enough to pay for this forum to be hosted, Michael should also pay for a separate Loopy Pro forum?

    ‘Deliberately recreating that historical accident’ could just as easily be ‘honoring the site’s origins’, couldn’t it?

    Must admit I hadn't really thought about the cost implications. Obviously I don't know the details of that. I was just thinking from a 'rational' point of view in terms of the name but if there are significant cost implications for Michael maybe that should, as you say, be the determining factor. It's just that the way the question was originally posed was open-ended and Michaal appeared to be actively looking for suggestions.

    Naturally, i don’t know the details about the costs involved either but i figure it has to cost more to have two websites rather than one!

    By the way, Michael explains his decision for the name on page 8 of this thread.

    Yeah I hadn't really caught up with the fact that it was a done deal - just that it was being suggested. I've bought a couple of web domains before and you're right that it's gonna cost more to run two site than one. I suppose the counter argument would be that a more representative name for this site may attract more traffic and therefore more revenue but I've just noticed for the first there don't appear to be any ads on this site so maybe there isn't any revenue from it. Anyway, having just read @Michael's post as suggested, it makes sense and I'm happy with whatever he's happy with.

  • Old Audiobus!

    New Audio Loopy Bus!

  • @charalew said:

    @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:

    @Robin2 said:

    @charalew said:
    Just chipping in here. Most of the content on this (really highly valued) site is about iPad apps and music making in general rather than Audiobus specifically. Presumably this is just a historical accident? However, if the new forum is named after Loopy Pro we will be deliberately recreating that historical accident for no obvious reason!

    Wouldn't it make sense to have a forum referencing Loopy Pro that was actually for specifically discussing Loopy Pro (which I assume would be both desirable and beneficial to it's users) and a separate forum for iPad apps and music making more generally. MagicMusicBus as suggested by @NeuM or something similar? The separate site could have a permanent link/pinned post on Loopy Pro to support @Michael's business model etc

    So, you’re suggesting that, as well as being kind enough to pay for this forum to be hosted, Michael should also pay for a separate Loopy Pro forum?

    ‘Deliberately recreating that historical accident’ could just as easily be ‘honoring the site’s origins’, couldn’t it?

    Must admit I hadn't really thought about the cost implications. Obviously I don't know the details of that. I was just thinking from a 'rational' point of view in terms of the name but if there are significant cost implications for Michael maybe that should, as you say, be the determining factor. It's just that the way the question was originally posed was open-ended and Michaal appeared to be actively looking for suggestions.

    Naturally, i don’t know the details about the costs involved either but i figure it has to cost more to have two websites rather than one!

    By the way, Michael explains his decision for the name on page 8 of this thread.

    Yeah I hadn't really caught up with the fact that it was a done deal - just that it was being suggested. I've bought a couple of web domains before and you're right that it's gonna cost more to run two site than one. I suppose the counter argument would be that a more representative name for this site may attract more traffic and therefore more revenue but I've just noticed for the first there don't appear to be any ads on this site so maybe there isn't any revenue from it. Anyway, having just read @Michael's post as suggested, it makes sense and I'm happy with whatever he's happy with.

    Worth just pointing out - there are no ads here so no revenue - maybe in the early days Michael was able to make money from affiliate links? No idea, just speculation. Regardless, that would not have been possible after Apple’s closure of the affiliate program in 2017.It’s pretty kind of Michael that he’s kept it going all these years. Keeping this forum running likely has more downside than upside for him.

  • wimwim
    edited October 2024

    forum.atastypixel.com

    Seriously. I think this is the best. loopypro.com is fine from a short-term marketing perspective, but I doubt Loopy Pro will be the one and only product @Michael puts out for life.

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    There absolutely should be some payback in marketing terms for this free, non-advertising cluttered service. (I hope anyone that has begrudged that just didn't think it through fully.) Until now, Michael, you haven't built your developer brand like you have your individual app brands. Maybe it's time to think in a bit broader terms.

  • @wim said:

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    Agreed, especially when done by committee.
    Have you ever heard a group of musicians trying to decide upon a band name?
    There's band politics and there's band politics. ;)

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    https://atastypixel.com/category/products/ for those at the back who need clarification. ;)

  • wimwim
    edited October 2024

    * disclaimer. I have about a 99% track of being dead wrong about marketing decisions over the course of my business career.

  • @wim said:
    forum.atastypixel.com

    Seriously. I think this is the best. loopypro.com is fine from a short-term marketing perspective, but I doubt Loopy Pro will be the one and only product @Michael puts out for life.

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    There absolutely should be some payback in marketing terms for this free, non-advertising cluttered service. (I hope anyone that has begrudged that just didn't think it through fully.) Until now, Michael, you haven't built your developer brand like you have your individual app brands. Maybe it's time to think in a bit broader terms.

    Good point. There are other good points people have made too about the validity of going for a name that really represents this place, like Mobile Music Forum etc. There have been other good points made about how it might be good to bring Android users in here, if even just to tempt them over. Definitely worth having a long, nuanced and civil discussion about all this, for sure for sure!

  • @wim said:
    forum.atastypixel.com

    Seriously. I think this is the best. loopypro.com is fine from a short-term marketing perspective, but I doubt Loopy Pro will be the one and only product @Michael puts out for life.

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    There absolutely should be some payback in marketing terms for this free, non-advertising cluttered service. (I hope anyone that has begrudged that just didn't think it through fully.) Until now, Michael, you haven't built your developer brand like you have your individual app brands. Maybe it's time to think in a bit broader terms.

    Thanks @wim! Actually for the foreseeable future, Loopy Pro is it. I have enough plans for that app to last me at least 10 years, so it’s quite deliberate that I’m focusing on that instead of the more generic brand.

  • @wim said:
    forum.atastypixel.com

    Seriously. I think this is the best. loopypro.com is fine from a short-term marketing perspective, but I doubt Loopy Pro will be the one and only product @Michael puts out for life.

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    There absolutely should be some payback in marketing terms for this free, non-advertising cluttered service. (I hope anyone that has begrudged that just didn't think it through fully.) Until now, Michael, you haven't built your developer brand like you have your individual app brands. Maybe it's time to think in a bit broader terms.

    Not a bad name either. A tasty pixel references all digital products. Not just iPhones. Apps like Koala, and Cubasis are cross platform, and I really wanted a forum that Android users like myself to share topics.

    I'm fascinated by the Audioroute protocol implemented by Android, and I'm sure a few developers would love a place to discuss about it.

    In additon, I do love chiming in about raspberry pi stuff, and Arduino stuff, which in its own way relies on pixels to actually configure it.

    Actually, can we vote? I personally would love A Tasty Pixel as the webpage. I'm also fine with Loopy Pro Forum, even if it's a subsection of the A Tasty Pixel page.

    And also, if there's a small section that links to the Drambo Forum, that would be great as well. Those guys (or drambonauts as they like to call themselves), do insane work in the signal manipulation field.

  • wimwim
    edited October 2024

    @Michael said:
    Thanks @wim! Actually for the foreseeable future, Loopy Pro is it. I have enough plans for that app to last me at least 10 years, so it’s quite deliberate that I’m focusing on that instead of the more generic brand.

    It's such a cool brand name though. 😎

  • wimwim
    edited October 2024

    I don't think voting for something like this is appropriate.

  • @Gavinski said:

    @wim said:
    forum.atastypixel.com

    Seriously. I think this is the best. loopypro.com is fine from a short-term marketing perspective, but I doubt Loopy Pro will be the one and only product @Michael puts out for life.

    Audiob.us forum is a textbook worthy case study in brand name promotional success. The difficulty in figuring out how best to rebrand now is evidence of that.

    How many people read "atastypixel" and had no idea what I'm referring to? If you did then I rest my case.

    There absolutely should be some payback in marketing terms for this free, non-advertising cluttered service. (I hope anyone that has begrudged that just didn't think it through fully.) Until now, Michael, you haven't built your developer brand like you have your individual app brands. Maybe it's time to think in a bit broader terms.

    Good point. There are other good points people have made too about the validity of going for a name that really represents this place, like Mobile Music Forum etc. There have been other good points made about how it might be good to bring Android users in here, if even just to tempt them over. Definitely worth having a long, nuanced and civil discussion about all this, for sure for sure!

    Indeed! I’m still open to the possibility that we are wrong about forum.loopypro.com. I think a factor that the later comments may not have taken into consideration is the benefit that it will offer to Loopy Pro; both the user community and the brand itself. I’m terrible at self promotion, but I think this might be a good idea on that front, and I don’t think it would have any detrimental effect to the forum given that it’s currently the Audiobus forum anyway.

    It’s an idea that I dismissed originally, hence the thread asking for suggestions on new names, but I was persuaded along the way.

  • @wim said:

    @Michael said:
    Thanks @wim! Actually for the foreseeable future, Loopy Pro is it. I have enough plans for that app to last me at least 10 years, so it’s quite deliberate that I’m focusing on that instead of the more generic brand.

    It's such a cool brand name though. 😎

    Agreed @wim

  • Let It Bleep
    Let It Beep

  • @yellow_eyez said:

    @wim said:
    I don't think voting for something like this is appropriate.

    +1

    —————

    In fact, if I was a mod I would close the thread dude. I think this was fun but the [right] decision was made…. I would even encourage Michael to consolidate further and just keep one domain for the flagship product (LP), get rid of atastypixel.com, and all traffic is routed to LP main page first, and everyone has to try the demo if they want to sign up to the forum….new members = new customers

    [anything below the line is not to be taken seriously]

    lololololol

  • @yellow_eyez said:

    @wim said:
    I don't think voting for something like this is appropriate.

    +1

    —————

    In fact, if I was a mod I would close the thread dude. I think this was fun but the [right] decision was made…. I would even encourage Michael to consolidate further and just keep one domain for the flagship product (LP), get rid of atastypixel.com, and all traffic is routed to LP main page first, and everyone has to try the demo if they want to sign up to the forum….new members = new customers

    [anything below the line is not to be taken seriously]

    got me in the first half not gonna lie

  • I haven’t read beyond the first three or four responses, but I like Mobile Music Society. It sounds old fashioned in a good way. It seems civilized, and perhaps will inspire us to be the same.

  • edited October 2024

    @Michael said:
    Oh, man, I'm so consistently flummoxed when faced with somewhat-arbitrary decisions 😆

    I've had quite a few people now make vigorous arguments for using "forum.loopypro.com", and I'm starting to come around. The downside – the breadth of the forum relative to the name – is one that already exists in the current setup and certainly won't get any worse, while the upside for Loopy Pro is arguably pretty considerable: Loopy Pro peeps who are looking for community will find a brilliant, vibrant and relatively on-topic one, and it'll certainly help to support me and my work (and I need all the help I can get because I'm a rubbish businessman!).

    Thank you so much for the input everybody – I’m just gonna close this thread so people who have missed the major points in this thread which are buried in previous pages don’t continue to invest effort in proposing name suggestions as I think we have a decision!

This discussion has been closed.