Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

OT: Which synth for £300

123457»

Comments

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @crony said:
    You may get 3 iPads for the price, but still beautiful :smile:
    http://fr.audiofanzine.com/synthe-analogique/arturia/matrixbrute/editorial/tests/le-diamant-brut.html

    Mininova still a good choice, have fun with it (I do !!!! )

    I'll get my hands on it on Sunday :)

  • kobamotokobamoto
    edited February 2017

    @syrupcore said:

    @Korakios said:
    @kobamoto great video you found. Thanks for sharing! Was looking for months an Alesis ION (which is hard to find with full working encoders) but this video totally changed my mind!

    Yeah, wow. That sounded amazing. Wish it was all straight minilogue though. From the creator:

    Just used imaging effects and reverb from Logic

    It's hard to know how much of an influence that stuff is having.

    good question, I particularly like this one, by somebody else.. again with external proc but not the same kind.

  • kobamotokobamoto

    this one has no external processing though

  • WillWill

    that ambient jam is a beauty. I stopped watching for a minute and thought it was a guitar.

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @syrupcore said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    My main reasons for choosing Mininova are that it has the performance controls which look perfect for the type of thing I will be doing.
    It uses a bigger version of the same synth engine that circuit has, which I initially used as a reason to rule it out, but I have come to realise that I can use Mininova as a sound designer for circuit (as long as I only use the parts of the synth engine that circuit has) meaning I will get more out of circuit too.

    Can the mininova be used to directly manipulate the sounds on the circuit (beyond the 8 macros)? If so, seems a no brainer. If not, seems like it could be pretty redundant, sonically. Though the performance controls are indeed very cool.

    The mininova can be used to edit sounds directly on the circuit.......I'm not 100 % sure that all parameters are a direct match, I need to go through the midi implementation charts.

  • WillWill

    @AndyPlankton said:

    @syrupcore said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    My main reasons for choosing Mininova are that it has the performance controls which look perfect for the type of thing I will be doing.
    It uses a bigger version of the same synth engine that circuit has, which I initially used as a reason to rule it out, but I have come to realise that I can use Mininova as a sound designer for circuit (as long as I only use the parts of the synth engine that circuit has) meaning I will get more out of circuit too.

    Can the mininova be used to directly manipulate the sounds on the circuit (beyond the 8 macros)? If so, seems a no brainer. If not, seems like it could be pretty redundant, sonically. Though the performance controls are indeed very cool.

    The mininova can be used to edit sounds directly on the circuit.......I'm not 100 % sure that all parameters are a direct match, I need to go through the midi implementation charts.

    But by default, most knobby parameters map directly to the same parameter on the circuit? That seems like a big deal. Surprised this isn't more known.

  • kobamotokobamoto

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @syrupcore said:

    @AndyPlankton said:

    @syrupcore said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    My main reasons for choosing Mininova are that it has the performance controls which look perfect for the type of thing I will be doing.
    It uses a bigger version of the same synth engine that circuit has, which I initially used as a reason to rule it out, but I have come to realise that I can use Mininova as a sound designer for circuit (as long as I only use the parts of the synth engine that circuit has) meaning I will get more out of circuit too.

    Can the mininova be used to directly manipulate the sounds on the circuit (beyond the 8 macros)? If so, seems a no brainer. If not, seems like it could be pretty redundant, sonically. Though the performance controls are indeed very cool.

    The mininova can be used to edit sounds directly on the circuit.......I'm not 100 % sure that all parameters are a direct match, I need to go through the midi implementation charts.

    But by default, most knobby parameters map directly to the same parameter on the circuit? That seems like a big deal. Surprised this isn't more known.

    Yes the filter knob, and the parameters on the little matrix thingy match up exactly...also parameters within the edit menu are matching up too, OSC Waveform etc....I need to do a full comparison of the CC numbers to see what if any differences there are.....but suffice to say if I plug the Mininova into the midi in port on the circuit and set global midi channel to 1 I can edit synth 1....global midi channel to 2 and I can edit synth 2.

  • brambosbrambos

    @DeVlaeminck said:
    Got lucky, and I got a brand new Roland JD-Xi for €395.
    With the new Patchbase editor for iPad it's very potent/versatile it could be a killer.

    Good recommendation. I once started making an iPad editor for it, but never finished it. The digital synth engine is a zillion times deeper than you'd expect just by looking at the front panel. I'd go as far as saying the supernatural engine is almost on par with the depth of an Access Virus TI, with all its different oscillator modes, wavetables, filter modes, modulation parameters, etc. Having that with 128 note polyphony is just astounding.

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @brambos said:

    @DeVlaeminck said:
    Got lucky, and I got a brand new Roland JD-Xi for €395.
    With the new Patchbase editor for iPad it's very potent/versatile it could be a killer.

    Good recommendation. I once started making an iPad editor for it, but never finished it. The digital synth engine is a zillion times deeper than you'd expect just by looking at the front panel. I'd go as far as saying the supernatural engine is almost on par with the depth of an Access Virus TI, with all its different oscillator modes, wavetables, filter modes, modulation parameters, etc. Having that with 128 note polyphony is just astounding.

    Talking of iPad editors....Soundmondo from Yamaha for the reface series looks very interesting indeed. Is this how it should be done ?
    https://soundmondo.yamahasynth.com/

  • ghostly606ghostly606

    Mininova... terrific choice. I have owned a lot of the synths mentioned here and have settled on the mininova myself. Absolute bargain of £135 on eBay, still over the moon with that one.

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @ghostly606 said:
    Mininova... terrific choice. I have owned a lot of the synths mentioned here and have settled on the mininova myself. Absolute bargain of £135 on eBay, still over the moon with that one.

    I am enjoying it :)

Sign In or Register to comment.