Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Logic pro coming with new ipads?

1…1617182022

Comments

  • cazelcazel

    @david_2017 mid-october

  • jacoujacou

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    I also used MainStage on Mac but switched over to AUM on iPad and don't miss MainStage. Of course it's a different workflow but I can achieve everything that I could achieve with MS. I even prefer AUM now :)

  • jacoujacou

    The annual or well biannual hoping for Logic thread HLT. Time just flies :smiley:

  • KirbyMumboKirbyMumbo

    I don't need Logic. I'd shit bricks if they made Drummer AUv3 lol

  • seonnthaproducerseonnthaproducer

    @iLLaFenT said:
    fingers crossed for at least a Logic Lite or something - being able to back my backing track session in logic and them send them over to the iPad with the tracks bounced would save so much time

    Garageband is too childish
    Cubasis is mehhh not a fan
    haven't tried Auria

    GarageBand is Logic lite.

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    I settled with Pure Synth Platinum, Synthmaster One, and Korg Module. Knowing Apple, they’d never make Mainstage AUv3 but I’m hoping they do.

  • BroCoastBroCoast

    @jacou said:

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    I also used MainStage on Mac but switched over to AUM on iPad and don't miss MainStage. Of course it's a different workflow but I can achieve everything that I could achieve with MS. I even prefer AUM now :)

    Intelligent key splits?

  • jacoujacou
    edited September 2022

    @BroCoast said:

    @jacou said:

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    I also used MainStage on Mac but switched over to AUM on iPad and don't miss MainStage. Of course it's a different workflow but I can achieve everything that I could achieve with MS. I even prefer AUM now :)

    Intelligent key splits?

    I don’t need that as I’m a guitarist but it looks like Doug got you covered in his video :)

    Edit: Not sure about the intelligent though

  • pax-eternapax-eterna

    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!> @AlmostAnonymous said:

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    It’s called keystage…..

    Yep, bought it tried it, way too arcane!

  • pax-eternapax-eterna

    @AlmostAnonymous said:

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    It’s called keystage…..

    read above

  • pax-eternapax-eterna

    @Jeezs said:
    Ok

    @AlmostAnonymous said:

    @pax-eterna said:
    Personally, I'd be way WAY more interested in Mainstage being ported to iOS!

    It’s called keystage…..

    Or Camelot …

    Yep got Camelot too

  • cvwondercvwonder

    They have to have at least one software surprise this year, right? Some kind if pro software for their amazingly overpowered ipad pro which is about to get even more powerful?

  • realdaweirealdawei

    iPad revenue is Apples smallest segment…> @cvwonder said:

    They have to have at least one software surprise this year, right? Some kind if pro software for their amazingly overpowered ipad pro which is about to get even more powerful?

    probably some derivative of xcode / playgrounds

  • JumpercollinsJumpercollins

  • wimwim

    @realdawei said:
    iPad revenue is Apples smallest segment…> @cvwonder said:

    They have to have at least one software surprise this year, right? Some kind if pro software for their amazingly overpowered ipad pro which is about to get even more powerful?

    probably some derivative of xcode / playgrounds

    I'd more expect an Xcode / Playgrounds announcement at WWDC than at an iPad event. On the other hand, if Logic is ever announced (and I'm not one especially thinks that'll happen), I doubt that will ever be at WWDC. Much more likely at something like this event.

  • david_2017david_2017

    we are still eager to know why iPads need 8GB or even topping 16GB of RAM :P

  • NeuMNeuM
    edited September 2022

    @david_2017 said:
    we are still eager to know why iPads need 8GB or even topping 16GB of RAM :P

    One reason would be the new “Stage Manager” feature (which is proving to be quite a problem for Apple to integrate on iPadOS 16), which allows desktop-like separate app windows and multiple open and running applications.

  • realdaweirealdawei

    @wim said:

    @realdawei said:
    iPad revenue is Apples smallest segment…> @cvwonder said:

    They have to have at least one software surprise this year, right? Some kind if pro software for their amazingly overpowered ipad pro which is about to get even more powerful?

    probably some derivative of xcode / playgrounds

    I'd more expect an Xcode / Playgrounds announcement at WWDC than at an iPad event. On the other hand, if Logic is ever announced (and I'm not one especially thinks that'll happen), I doubt that will ever be at WWDC. Much more likely at something like this event.

    Playgrounds doesn’t > @wim said:

    @realdawei said:
    iPad revenue is Apples smallest segment…> @cvwonder said:

    They have to have at least one software surprise this year, right? Some kind if pro software for their amazingly overpowered ipad pro which is about to get even more powerful?

    probably some derivative of xcode / playgrounds

    I'd more expect an Xcode / Playgrounds announcement at WWDC than at an iPad event. On the other hand, if Logic is ever announced (and I'm not one especially thinks that'll happen), I doubt that will ever be at WWDC. Much more likely at something like this event.

    Playgrounds iPad has yet to be updated for the newest swift, and doesn’t support the new Swift Charts. Highly likely they will have new Playgrounds release to go along with iPadOS 16.1 on the new hardware.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • michael_mmichael_m

    @ehehehe said:
    Bizniz wise it would be a dumb move, being expensive to make compared to the small user base and making people drop macbooks. It's annoying but logic 😂. Hope they trash GB and makes it with a usable interface that has a less hyper-annoying workflow. It switches screens with fugly animations waay to often and miss a whole lot more features (midi fx?) than Cubasis. I guess that something like GarageBand Pro arrives years before Logic Amateur, lol.

    I’d be happy with GB if they added a mixer and automation.

  • NeuMNeuM

    @michael_m said:

    @ehehehe said:
    Bizniz wise it would be a dumb move, being expensive to make compared to the small user base and making people drop macbooks. It's annoying but logic 😂. Hope they trash GB and makes it with a usable interface that has a less hyper-annoying workflow. It switches screens with fugly animations waay to often and miss a whole lot more features (midi fx?) than Cubasis. I guess that something like GarageBand Pro arrives years before Logic Amateur, lol.

    I’d be happy with GB if they added a mixer and automation.

    GarageBand already has a limited form of automation. Volume only. I suppose they could afford to offer a more robust form of automation, but this has not been a priority of theirs to date.

  • michael_mmichael_m

    @NeuM said:

    @michael_m said:

    @ehehehe said:
    Bizniz wise it would be a dumb move, being expensive to make compared to the small user base and making people drop macbooks. It's annoying but logic 😂. Hope they trash GB and makes it with a usable interface that has a less hyper-annoying workflow. It switches screens with fugly animations waay to often and miss a whole lot more features (midi fx?) than Cubasis. I guess that something like GarageBand Pro arrives years before Logic Amateur, lol.

    I’d be happy with GB if they added a mixer and automation.

    GarageBand already has a limited form of automation. Volume only. I suppose they could afford to offer a more robust form of automation, but this has not been a priority of theirs to date.

    Yeah, but that’s really minimal. A real mixer and animation comparable to other DAWs would make a world of difference to it.

  • NeuMNeuM
    edited September 2022

    @michael_m said:

    @NeuM said:

    @michael_m said:

    @ehehehe said:
    Bizniz wise it would be a dumb move, being expensive to make compared to the small user base and making people drop macbooks. It's annoying but logic 😂. Hope they trash GB and makes it with a usable interface that has a less hyper-annoying workflow. It switches screens with fugly animations waay to often and miss a whole lot more features (midi fx?) than Cubasis. I guess that something like GarageBand Pro arrives years before Logic Amateur, lol.

    I’d be happy with GB if they added a mixer and automation.

    GarageBand already has a limited form of automation. Volume only. I suppose they could afford to offer a more robust form of automation, but this has not been a priority of theirs to date.

    Yeah, but that’s really minimal. A real mixer and animation comparable to other DAWs would make a world of difference to it.

    Believe me, I'd love nothing more than a real mixing board style UI complete with flying faders, but I can also understand why they don't offer these things on iPad. GarageBand is meant to be accessible to beginners, as well as the more advanced user who just needs a fast and easy way to record. It does this. Should there be a "Pro" version of GarageBand... or a simplified version of Logic? I mean, I'm just glad they've never decided to abandon GB at this point since that has been the fate of so much of their other niche software products. Anyone remember "Soundtrack" (on desktop) or "Music Memos" (on iOS)? I loved and used both of those, but as soon as they release anything that is TOO niche, they determine it's not worth the effort to continue to support them.

  • michael_mmichael_m

    @NeuM said:

    @michael_m said:

    @NeuM said:

    @michael_m said:

    @ehehehe said:
    Bizniz wise it would be a dumb move, being expensive to make compared to the small user base and making people drop macbooks. It's annoying but logic 😂. Hope they trash GB and makes it with a usable interface that has a less hyper-annoying workflow. It switches screens with fugly animations waay to often and miss a whole lot more features (midi fx?) than Cubasis. I guess that something like GarageBand Pro arrives years before Logic Amateur, lol.

    I’d be happy with GB if they added a mixer and automation.

    GarageBand already has a limited form of automation. Volume only. I suppose they could afford to offer a more robust form of automation, but this has not been a priority of theirs to date.

    Yeah, but that’s really minimal. A real mixer and animation comparable to other DAWs would make a world of difference to it.

    Believe me, I'd love nothing more than a real mixing board style UI complete with flying faders, but I can also understand why they don't offer these things on iPad. GarageBand is meant to be accessible to beginners, as well as the more advanced user who just needs a fast and easy way to record. It does this. Should there be a "Pro" version of GarageBand... or a simplified version of Logic? I mean, I'm just glad they've never decided to abandon GB at this point since that has been the fate of so much of their other niche software products. Anyone remember "Soundtrack" (on desktop) or "Music Memos" (on iOS)? I loved and used both of those, but as soon as they release anything that is TOO niche, they determine it's not worth the effort to continue to support them.

    I think Logic for iPad is unlikely to ever happen, but if there was a paid version of something more advanced than GB I’d be happy to invest.

  • realdaweirealdawei
    edited September 2022

    They haven’t touched the core of GB in years - just adding content packs…very few sw engineers I can think of would stay inspired while not releasing jack s** for 4 years. They’re probably all on the AR team

  • stormywaterzstormywaterz

    Just a couple miner updates would do wonders for gb. proper stem export for me and a proper mixer for the drummer along making it midi over audio so edits can be made. Something so simple as making your own drum kits would be nice.

    You do have a pretty power gb on Mac with logic on the same platform. So take a couple of those gb aspects and put them on the iPad to compete. Even being able to move projects back and forth from Mac to iPad that includes your midi would a step in the right direction.

    I mean the whole goal is guess is to dabble on the iPad then move it to logic.

  • michael_mmichael_m

    I think the lack of a mixer comes up quite often. That seems like one of the biggest wins for users if it was added.

  • krassmannkrassmann

    I better wait for Ableton Live for iPad. I’m sure it will be.

  • david_2017david_2017

    @krassmann said:
    I better wait for Ableton Live for iPad. I’m sure it will be.

    gamechangier

  • belldubelldu

    I don't understand Apple's approach to GB. We've all seen the wonders that one person dev teams can manage. Why not add stem export, MIDI export, add a normalise toggle, automate pan, etc...
    All these things can be worked around and they have sort of implemented a limited master track (FX), but really it would take just one dev six months or so to deliver the goods.

  • NeuMNeuM

    @belldu said:
    I don't understand Apple's approach to GB. We've all seen the wonders that one person dev teams can manage. Why not add stem export, MIDI export, add a normalise toggle, automate pan, etc...
    All these things can be worked around and they have sort of implemented a limited master track (FX), but really it would take just one dev six months or so to deliver the goods.

    My guess is they would like anyone interested in more functions to take the leap and move up to Logic Pro. Personally, Logic Pro doesn’t interest me, except for a few features I might occasionally want to use but I can usually find alternatives.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025