Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Ukraine

17891113

Comments

  • @yug said:

    @cyberheater said:

    @Franketti said:
    The invasion has begun…

    It's frankly unbelievable.

    Unfortunately I believe at this point Ukraine will fall. Putin won't stop until he's completed the invasion. Sanctions don't matter to him and the west won't get involved in a military campaign against Russia.

    Nato will do f**k all.

    Ukraine will not fall. This stupid attack will be Putin's downfall

    Will Ukraine be Putin’s Vietnam? I don’t think so. Their population seems quite split on the whole issue. Russia will take it over and absorb it.

  • it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

  • Russian developers may end up being victims of sanctions.

  • @cian said:
    it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

    Putin has been quite explicit about his desire to “re-unify” what were formerly Russian territories. He has triangulated Russian interests and he’s taking advantage of the situation with the weakest US President in modern history.

  • Wars don’t change except in name;
    The next one must go just the same,
    And new foul tricks unguessed before
    Will win and justify this War.

    — Robert Graves, “The Next War”

  • @Samu said:
    One of my absolute favorite developers @jimpavloff lives in Ukraine...
    ...just hoping everything is ok with him.

    Keep safe, best wishes <3

  • @NeuM said:

    @cian said:
    it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

    Putin has been quite explicit about his desire to “re-unify” what were formerly Russian territories. He has triangulated Russian interests and he’s taking advantage of the situation with the weakest US President in modern history.

    You sure you’re not a socialist, you sound like a Putin apologist to me.

  • edited February 2022

    @Gravitas said:
    No, he isn’t.

    All of the governments involved are.

    Edit.

    To clarify we’ve had two years of the worst pandemic in
    recent memory and now our governments are going to War.
    This something we do not want nor need.

    Putin knows that if there ever is the time to take Ukraine, this is it. Brexit, tail end of pandemic etc.

    @NeuM said:

    @yug said:

    @cyberheater said:

    @Franketti said:
    The invasion has begun…

    It's frankly unbelievable.

    Unfortunately I believe at this point Ukraine will fall. Putin won't stop until he's completed the invasion. Sanctions don't matter to him and the west won't get involved in a military campaign against Russia.

    Nato will do f**k all.

    Ukraine will not fall. This stupid attack will be Putin's downfall

    Will Ukraine be Putin’s Vietnam? I don’t think so. Their population seems quite split on the whole issue. Russia will take it over and absorb it.

    I seriously doubt that. This would be the case if Russia was a prosperous country. While this is true for oligarchs, regular Joes or in Russia’s case Vanias, will not just take it. There’s not much margin left. That is unless Putin has some Sino-Russian magic going up his sleeve.

    If the West is resolute with their sanction, which can be doubted as they will hurt both sides, there is a chance that the red line will get crossed. It also may be that Russia will get even more China style draconian and just completely isolates from the west. This is also a very real possibility, and would make dissent harder to accomplish. I don’t know for sure but Russian young are likely resistant to Putin’s demagoguery and quite world savvy considering free access to WWW.

    Here’s an interesting article I just read on RT. While clearly a propaganda piece, it does illustrate quite well where Putin might be coming from. It’s quite long winded but worth a read, I think.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/550271-putin-doctrine-foreign-policy/?fbclid=IwAR3b615gia8FoEv50YMcUrYqKHRv5-YSIuM8gMomtpVNxORbo-NHUZgof2o

  • @NeuM said:

    @cian said:
    it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

    Putin has been quite explicit about his desire to “re-unify” what were formerly Russian territories. He has triangulated Russian interests and he’s taking advantage of the situation with the weakest US President in modern history.

    IMHO this has nothing to do with the western weakness but rather with European dumbness. That NATO is not going to war for Ukraine was obvious. Putin knew that. Putin couldn‘t allow the Ukraine to be a potential NATO member. Many analysts had foreseen that. For example former US national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. This man is definitely not known as a friend of Russia but he clearly acknowledged what Ukraine means for Russia’s security. Here a quote from a 2015 interview with Der Spiegel:

    Brzezinski: I do believe that the final outcome of this crisis should be reached on the basis of an accommodation, and that the fundamental framework for such an accommodation is the application to Ukraine of the same arrangements that have provided for stability and peace for a number of decades now between Russia and Finland. Ukraine should be free to choose its political identity, its political philosophy, and institutionalize it by closer links with Europe. But at the same time, Russia should be assured credibly that Ukraine will not become a member of NATO. I still think this is the formula for a solution.

    I’m sure Putin would have preferred to reach that goal without military force because this resolution will have its price - politically and monetary. No doubt about that. So why did the west not choose the easy way out and continued to ignore Russsia’s security interests in contrast to better knowledge?

    I assume NATO is not going to war but will impose hard sanctions. If the game plays out like that the consequences are quite different for the western players: not the worst for the US but quite bad for the EU. The US does not much trade with Russia, doesn’t rely on their gas and the war is far away. The EU, first of all Germany, will be hit hard by the sanctions and possible gas supply interruptions. Situation in eastern Europe will remain unstable. As a result the economic and military bonds between EU countries and the US will be strengthened. The US could not win Ukraine but also didn’t lose on the Eurasian chessboard.

    If you ask me Europe was too dumb to see this coming. IMHO EU should have strengthened their own military power but acknowledge the Russian security needs from a position of strength. Ukraine could have taken the path that Brzezinski outlined: politically associated with EU but military neutral. The Russians could have accepted that and Ukraine could have been the joint between EU and Russia. But this would have left the US out of the game…

  • @knewspeak said:

    @NeuM said:

    @cian said:
    it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

    Putin has been quite explicit about his desire to “re-unify” what were formerly Russian territories. He has triangulated Russian interests and he’s taking advantage of the situation with the weakest US President in modern history.

    You sure you’re not a socialist, you sound like a Putin apologist to me.

    Don’t say stupid things. Putin is a very dangerous person because he is an intelligent and strategic thinker who can see an opportunity to take advantage of a weak President. Biden should be removed from office.

  • Funny how so many supposedly leftist contrarians got this so wrong. Taibbi, Greenwald, Gabbard, all insisting this would never happen and that Putin's demands were reasonable.

    Worth noting that Trump and several Fox personalities were also defending Putin in recent days.

    And who has been saying for weeks that Putin was likely to invade. Oh yes, that would be Biden. Looks like he was right. 🤷‍♀️

  • edited February 2022

    @krassmann said:

    @NeuM said:

    @cian said:
    it could get very bad in Ukraine. I can't imagine that Russia intends to occupy the entire country, but then I wouldn't imagine that Russia would invade like this either.

    Putin has been quite explicit about his desire to “re-unify” what were formerly Russian territories. He has triangulated Russian interests and he’s taking advantage of the situation with the weakest US President in modern history.

    IMHO this has nothing to do with the western weakness but rather with European dumbness. That NATO is not going to war for Ukraine was obvious. Putin knew that. Putin couldn‘t allow the Ukraine to be a potential NATO member. Many analysts had foreseen that. For example former US national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. This man is definitely not known as a friend of Russia but he clearly acknowledged what Ukraine means for Russia’s security. Here a quote from a 2015 interview with Der Spiegel:

    Brzezinski: I do believe that the final outcome of this crisis should be reached on the basis of an accommodation, and that the fundamental framework for such an accommodation is the application to Ukraine of the same arrangements that have provided for stability and peace for a number of decades now between Russia and Finland. Ukraine should be free to choose its political identity, its political philosophy, and institutionalize it by closer links with Europe. But at the same time, Russia should be assured credibly that Ukraine will not become a member of NATO. I still think this is the formula for a solution.

    I’m sure Putin would have preferred to reach that goal without military force because this resolution will have its price - politically and monetary. No doubt about that. So why did the west not choose the easy way out and continued to ignore Russsia’s security interests in contrast to better knowledge?

    I assume NATO is not going to war but will impose hard sanctions. If the game plays out like that the consequences are quite different for the western players: not the worst for the US but quite bad for the EU. The US does not much trade with Russia, doesn’t rely on their gas and the war is far away. The EU, first of all Germany, will be hit hard by the sanctions and possible gas supply interruptions. Situation in eastern Europe will remain unstable. As a result the economic and military bonds between EU countries and the US will be strengthened. The US could not win Ukraine but also didn’t lose on the Eurasian chessboard.

    If you ask me Europe was too dumb to see this coming. IMHO EU should have strengthened their own military power but acknowledge the Russian security needs from a position of strength. Ukraine could have taken the path that Brzezinski outlined: politically associated with EU but military neutral. The Russians could have accepted that and Ukraine could have been the joint between EU and Russia. But this would have left the US out of the game…

    US weakness absolutely contributed to the current military action. The U.S. was energy independent until President Biden ended that as soon as he came into office. Russia is now the fourth largest supplier of oil to the U.S.

    Joe Biden deliberately weakened the U.S. and helped fund Russia.

  • @ExAsperis99 said:
    Facts matter. Trump was, in fact, impeached twice, the second time for inciting insurrection. He not was not convicted in either impeachment trial. Nonetheless, he was certainly impeached. I mean, is that just utter ignorance or magical thinking?

    Yes.

  • @supadom said:

    @Gravitas said:
    No, he isn’t.

    All of the governments involved are.

    Edit.

    To clarify we’ve had two years of the worst pandemic in
    recent memory and now our governments are going to War.
    This something we do not want nor need.

    Putin knows that if there ever is the time to take Ukraine, this is it. Brexit, tail end of pandemic etc.

    Agreed.
    When an opponent believes you are weak that’s when
    they’ll attack, that’s why it didn’t come as a surprise.
    It’s unwanted for sure but unsurprising.

  • @richardyot said:
    Funny how so many supposedly leftist contrarians got this so wrong. Taibbi, Greenwald, Gabbard, all insisting this would never happen and that Putin's demands were reasonable.

    Worth noting that Trump and several Fox personalities were also defending Putin in recent days.

    And who has been saying for weeks that Putin was likely to invade. Oh yes, that would be Biden. Looks like he was right. 🤷‍♀️

    Joe Biden is THE REASON why Putin sent his troops in now. Biden is an inept fool.

  • @ExAsperis99 said:
    I like how every once in a while the reasonable facade slips and it's like a venomous libertarian robot from Westworld that's caught in a loop.

    For the record, Trump was impeached twice.

    🤣 Perfect!

  • edited February 2022

    If anyone was the least bit surprised that Putin decided to invade Ukraine, it might be a good time to stop posting your takes on what is happening and spend time reading the thoughts of people who over the past decade or more have been suggesting the likelihood of this happening. There is quite a bit of diversity in the reasoning and political alignment of people that have been predicting this move for years -- and many of them surely have parts of it wrong (everyone is blinded to some degree by their priors and there is a diversity of reasoning) -- but certainly it is worth looking at those diverse analyses to try to understand the situation better.

    From reading the posts here on the forum, it strikes me that many treat Putin's (I don't say Russia -- because I don't believe that Putin speaks for most Russians) pretenses and past rhetoric as facts rather than as moves in a long game to control Ukraine -- for whatever reason. It is strange to me that people treat his pretenses and claims with so little skepticism.

    Hopefully, the situation will resolve well (whatever that might mean).

    Prayers for the Ukrainian people and their safety.

  • @JeffChasteen said:

    @ExAsperis99 said:
    I like how every once in a while the reasonable facade slips and it's like a venomous libertarian robot from Westworld that's caught in a loop.

    For the record, Trump was impeached twice.

    🤣 Perfect!

    Personal attacks usually signal the imminent closure of a thread. Great job.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @Samu said:
    One of my absolute favorite developers @jimpavloff lives in Ukraine...
    ...just hoping everything is ok with him.

    Keep safe, best wishes <3

    He’d be better advised to leave immediately. That goes for any Ukrainian who values their freedom or their life. Putin has fully committed troops and the Russian military to a takeover.

  • It’s funny how libertarians seem to have a fetish for authoritarians.

    The cognitive dissonance must be deafening.

  • @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @Samu said:
    One of my absolute favorite developers @jimpavloff lives in Ukraine...
    ...just hoping everything is ok with him.

    Keep safe, best wishes <3

    He’d be better advised to leave immediately. That goes for any Ukrainian who values their freedom or their life. Putin has fully committed troops and the Russian military to a takeover.

    Your admiration for Putin is no more shocking that Tucker Carlson's admiration of Putin, as revolting as it is. And the nonsensical drumbeat that Biden's supposed weakness simultaneously exaggerated the threat of invasion that was never going to happen AND caused it — well, I've long given up trying to predict where you'll move the goalposts.

    But the utter vulgarity of suggesting that an innocent man who is in the crosshairs of an invasion SHOULD SIMPLY LEAVE HIS HOME IMMEDIATELY because your strongman hero means business? What is wrong with you?

  • wimwim
    edited February 2022

    @Gravitas said:

    @supadom said:

    @Gravitas said:
    No, he isn’t.

    All of the governments involved are.

    Edit.

    To clarify we’ve had two years of the worst pandemic in
    recent memory and now our governments are going to War.
    This something we do not want nor need.

    Putin knows that if there ever is the time to take Ukraine, this is it. Brexit, tail end of pandemic etc.

    Agreed.
    When an opponent believes you are weak that’s when
    they’ll attack, that’s why it didn’t come as a surprise.
    It’s unwanted for sure but unsurprising.

    Which makes me very worried about Taiwan. If there was ever a time where China is likely make their move, this is it.

  • @McD said:

    @NeuM said:
    No, I’ve read the U.S. Code cited by the newsies. It is not illegal for the Chief Executive. That’s a completely bogus argument.

    Trump is not the Chief Executive. Deal with it.
    "Yes, he is."
    "No he isn't". I quit. Wack-a-mole is only worth playing if there are rules.

    You seem to forget that the Magabilly IS the modern Renaissance man.
    They are all constitutional scholars, epidemiologists, and foreign policy experts.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @NeuM said:

    @Simon said:

    @musikeer said:
    Don’t feed the troll

    I honestly don't think he is a troll. He contributes a lot to general discussion - it's only in the politial threads where things heat up.

    NeuM clearly is a right winger, and so his whole world view is different to some on this forum.

    He will have a 180 degrees different opinions on issues like Trump, vax, abortion, tax, capitalism, guns, race, immigration etc.... to some on this forum.

    He might even have a different view on things like laws and historical records - things that many consider "set in stone" or "factual". His interpretation of "reported facts" or "accepted truth" may be totally opposite to you. You may think his views are the opposite of "accepted" and "recorded" reality.

    It is a big world with lots of people with different views. That's fine. Everyone has the right to their views - even if you think their views are crazy, unfair, ignorant, cruel, delusional, misguided or whatever.

    We all know him now: "he's the guy on the AB Form who takes a right wing stance in political matters". So we can't act surprised when he comes out with something we don't agree with. He will always bash Biden and praise Trump. He will always interpret the facts to support the right. That doesn't surprise me, as he is a right winger. That's where he's coming from. And, yes, left wingers do the same.

    You don't have to agree with him. You can tell him he's wrong. And why. Or you can ignore him. But I don't think labelling him a troll is accurate or helpful.

    I appreciate the fair treatment. We don’t have to always agree on everything. Life would be boring with nothing but across-the-board agreement on all things, don’t you think?

    Just one thing: I don’t always agree with or praise President Trump. In fact, I think he has many weaknesses which make him a problem. From my point of view, the alternatives are much, much worse and I believe we’re seeing this play out in real time in the form of the current administration.

    Biden told the world about Putin’s plan, he was correct, Trump loves what Putin is doing, birds of a feather, no doubt.

    Putin didn’t invade while Trump was President. Don’t leave out that critically important detail. Putin knows a weak, confused man when he sees him in the form of Joe Biden.

    May I remind you about Trump’s negotiations with the Taliban and his best pal the ‘little rocket man’ quite the diplomat. :# :D

    Sure you can. His administration drafted up a plan to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and he was excoriated over it by Democrats and his own military advisors advised against it. I remember it clearly. Then the Biden administration came in and executed part of the plan in the most incompetent conceivable way, getting American military killed in the process. A total disaster. If Biden was the savvy planner and politician he claimed to be, why would he not draft up his own plan and make sure every contingency was covered beforehand? I think everyone would like an answer to that one.

    Little rocket man still fires his rockets, making nukes, thought he could cut a deal.

    Remember when little rocket man sent the former guy the huge over-sized manila envelope knowing that it would make the short-fingered vulgarian...look even more short-fingered?
    Good times.

  • @espiegel123 said:
    If anyone was the least bit surprised that Putin decided to invade Ukraine, it might be a good time to stop posting your takes on what is happening and spend time reading the thoughts of people who over the past decade or more have been suggesting the likelihood of this happening. There is quite a bit of diversity in the reasoning and political alignment of people that have been predicting this move for yours -- and many of them surely have parts of it wrong (everyone is blinded to some degree by their priors and there is a diversity of reasoning) -- but certainly it is worth looking at those diverse analyses to try to understand the situation better.

    From reading the posts here on the forum, it strikes me that many treat Putin's (I don't say Russia -- because I don't believe that Putin speaks for most Russians) pretenses and past rhetoric as facts rather than as moves in a long game to control Ukraine -- for whatever reason. It is strange to me that people treat his pretenses and claims with so little skepticism.

    Hopefully, the situation will resolve well (whatever that might mean).

    Prayers for the Ukrainian people and their safety.

    We saw this coming 20 years ago. I have no idea what everyone was expecting from a man who creates his own term limits.

    Apropos… or should I say Appropos…

    https://thehill.com/policy/international/595474-madeleine-albright-says-putin-making-historic-mistake?amp

  • @NeuM said:

    @JeffChasteen said:

    @ExAsperis99 said:
    I like how every once in a while the reasonable facade slips and it's like a venomous libertarian robot from Westworld that's caught in a loop.

    For the record, Trump was impeached twice.

    🤣 Perfect!

    Personal attacks usually signal the imminent closure of a thread. Great job.

    Since he deftly compared you to an automaton, I don’t think “personal” is the best descriptor in this case.

  • @wim said:

    @Gravitas said:

    @supadom said:

    @Gravitas said:
    No, he isn’t.

    All of the governments involved are.

    Edit.

    To clarify we’ve had two years of the worst pandemic in
    recent memory and now our governments are going to War.
    This something we do not want nor need.

    Putin knows that if there ever is the time to take Ukraine, this is it. Brexit, tail end of pandemic etc.

    Agreed.
    When an opponent believes you are weak that’s when
    they’ll attack, that’s why it didn’t come as a surprise.
    It’s unwanted for sure but unsurprising.

    Which makes me very worried about Taiwan. If there was ever a time where China is likely make their move, this is it.

    You’re not the only one with such concerns for sure.
    Apparently China have declared that they will not
    make any moves on Taiwan at this moment in time.
    I personally am not trusting the words of any
    of these Leaders, the West included by the way
    so all we can do is wait and see.

    Still, saying that China have much to lose financially if they do attack Taiwan.
    Financially China is sweet right now and I don’t think
    they would want nor need to risk that financial security.
    If they do move on Taiwan then heavy sanctions will damage that financial security.
    China has immense trade with the rest of the world
    and I think that will sway the situation favourably against War with Taiwan.
    It’s mainly been Russia that has been making noises in regards to War
    and now they, as we now know, have followed through.

    Has there been sightings of military movement in that area of the world do you know?
    There have been reports of military air traffic in the media but non more unusual than
    what would normally be happening as the airforces tend to like to play chicken with each other.

  • edited February 2022

    @richardyot said:
    It’s funny how libertarians seem to have a fetish for authoritarians.

    The cognitive dissonance must be deafening.

    A realistic assessment of the situation should never be considered "support". And lying about someone else's motivations is a pathetic line of argumentation.

    If anyone here just watched Joe Biden's address to the nation, they saw a toothless invalid speaking. He just said he's going to "wait for a month" to see what happens. Ukraine will be completely overrun by Russian forces in a matter of days or weeks. Biden is an idiot.

  • @Gravitas said:

    @wim said:

    Which makes me very worried about Taiwan. If there was ever a time where China is likely make their move, this is it.

    Has there been sightings of military movement in that area of the world do you know?
    There have been reports of military air traffic in the media but non more unusual than
    what would normally be happening as the airforces tend to like to play chicken with each other.

    There would be a pretty visible build up of forces and resources. China seem as blindsided by the Ukrainian war as everyone else. And seemingly not happy about it.

This discussion has been closed.