Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
anywhere would be great if they cared about distancing but they don't care, they're acting like it's spring break out here and they are gonna get what people got from spring break too.....
honestly I think we should let people be free, just don't let them harm others, and make them sign a register that says they don't care if they get the virus and don't allow them to use any resources needed for victims of the virus if they self infect.... In a free society people should be free to reap what they sow, without it costing non-reapers taxes or medical resources.
@kobamoto are you a detractor yourself ? Just asking your opinion . The definition sounds similar to half the comments you make .
Lol 😂
be specific, cause you're detracting right now.
@Krupa wrote: "Everything was third hand hearsay with little or no analysis or judgement on whether to include information or not, no right to reply and looked like a copy paste job knocked up to excite imbeciles."
You describe CNN's reporting of the last 5 odd years perfectly! Stay informed with a tech publication owned by Code Nast. And don't read a single tweet without a blue tick. Stay informed, self censor!
A brief search of information about the web site whose articles you posted, reveal it as a site that often amplifies unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. The articles you listed provide other articles as substantiation for the accusations they site rather than any reliable source of corroboration.
For all CNN’s flaws, there generally ends up being ways of corroborating OR NOT the information they post. And if there isn’t a way of corroborating what they put forward some skepticism is warranted.
This.
NPR News - exlcuding op-eds - is about as good as it gets in the US for quality, accurate reporting (though not without both-siderism). But also it's good to cross-check with BBC and others.
FOX is anti-news, in that, it's proven through research that the more you watch, the more ignorant of facts you become.
Found a interesting resource for people who have symptoms that last longer than two weeks, sometimes for months and also people who have a long recovery. It has links to support groups and articles on long term effects some people are experiencing.
https://www.c19recoveryawareness.com
the whole premise of detracting is corny AF, sure pontificating on whether fux news, cnn, or msnbc told a lie today or not can be entertaining but what I want to know is how anybody can be expected to be taken seriously if they don't keep that same energy and feigned outrage over whether the President of the United States lied to you or not today.
I wonder if there is an endorphin release associated with all of this misdirection and look over there hocus pocus...
these cornball detractors are never specific and act like they were raised to at whatever cost not stand for anything in particular...I still prefer the Richard Spencers of the world who are honest about their delusions of grandeur, ffs now I sound like a conservative what happened to the good ole days lol
too many sucka MCs on the mic... get your priorities straight... did somebody that the American people voted for Lie to the American People about this virus, Pandemic, and response if so, what did the liar say, and what are these corny ass detractors trying to achieve via the false justification of his lies?
wtf is in the water over at trump tower? (host words not important, but this is proof positive that Eric is clearly not adopted)
>
I don’t trust the BBC these days, their strings are being pulled by the government. Caught out telling porkies in anti-Labour/anti-Remain/anti-Corbyn reports, and Kunsberg is a disgrace.
They’ve basically become the public face of the Tory PR machine.
Only source I trust these days is The Guardian.
Corny AF
which one of the doctors on his frontline covid-19 task force are taking this?
This type of debate just reminds me of the whole "both sides of the argument" game that has corrupted
critical thinking. It's like we pretend were still playing tennis but the net has been moved so the court is and 80/20 split. The rules and norms are gone and we pretend both sides deserve to be heard.
It's a nightmare and I assumed the system could self-correct. The Legislative Branch took a swing at the rule of law, some parts of the court system and the department of justice tools swings at using the laws that are on the books but we keep pushing it back to wait for the election without any confidence their will be any fairness and rules that govern that exercise of freedom either.
Keep fighting with your intelligence, passion and cry fowl. The game is rigged and we are the ultimate
defense against the loss of our republic to the forces of corruption and sedition. No conspiracy... just
demonstrated facts for anyone that hasn't joined the cult.
Thanks for the use of the mic. We will need to pick sides to ever move the net back to match the constitutional guidelines for a fair game of governance.
nobody is even calling for checks, balances, or accountability anymore except the house. the Whitehouse, the senate, and I'm afraid the Supreme Court are basically in outright decline of their core responsibilities.. We effectively only have one branch of government right now. The entire nation has been enveloped by a giant taint that hasn't been washed in 3 years.
Good to know! As a Yank, I'm a little behind the times.
I’ve never bought a newspaper, ever. Well, I’ve bought about 3 copies across my life, mainly when I was younger and for looking for a job, certainly not for any editorial content. Most of my generation bought the paper in the same way they all mindlessly got cars, got married, got careers, got houses, etc like some robot conveyor belt. I always argued that if the newspapers all said different things, how can they be correct? I’ve never seen the point in getting up to date news as soon as it happens. If a current affair is that important, it’ll come to me, and in good time.
What a beautiful angel of light, shines so bright, in that house of white. RIP USA, once a great nation.
The Guardian used to be fine publication with genuine investigative journalism. But it succumbed to the Establishment and Corporatti years ago. E.g. How they’ve thrown Assange under the bus is truly despicable. I highly recommend off-guardian.org
how President Trump and Jared Kushner threw Jamal Khashoggi under the bus after the fact and (possibly before) was despicable, and deplorable but oh well what else isn't new.
In what way?
@monzoPro. @vitocorleone123... etc....etc
I don’t trust the BBC these days, their strings are being pulled by the government. Caught out telling porkies in anti-Labour/anti-Remain/anti-Corbyn reports, and Kunsberg is a disgrace.
They’ve basically become the public face of the Tory PR machine.
Only source I trust these days is The Guardian.
Good to know! As a Yank, I am a little behind the times.
———— Interesting, I don’t recognise the pro-Tory agenda so much. I seem to remember much criticism of the BBC for being so obviously pro-Brexit remain/pro-Labour and pro-Corbyn in recent times. Hate for the Yanks to get a biased impression. Is the Guardian a trusted, unbiased mainstream paper these days? Don’t forget that all these critical posts only speak for the individual’s take on things, which doesn’t always go for everyone else.
The BBC have been officially told off for mis-reporting stuff about Corbyn, and you'd have to be blind not to see the government bias on their news website. They have been constantly critisized over it, though the Tories did try and throw a dead cat on the table and accuse them of left-wing bias, but it's was brushed off as typical gaslighting.
More recently their political editor shared a post on Twitter from a 'government source', accusing Labour 'activists' of assaulting the Health Minister. It was quickly rejected - since there was already full, clear video evidence circulating, also on Twitter, exposing that as a total lie. But nevertheless her post remained for a couple of hours, quietly removed later without an apology. Job done.
I'm not going to get into a long arguement about it, it's being done and I'm not wasting time with right-wing whataboutisms and gaslighting. If you don't agree, fine.
The Guardian. It's not perfect, but I appreciate the fact it hosts articles from both sides of the debate. So you will see articles by government friendly commentators, as well as others, so there is a lot more balance than on other channels.
For my usage it's handy to read a BBC news story about the government doing 100,000 virus tests, that can then be cross referenced via the Guardian which will show factual data exposing a large chunk of those tests were still in the post.
Currently the BBC is full of pro-get back to work stories, whereas the Guardian is taking a more cautious approach. I know who I'm going to believe on that one.
This simply isn't a valid comparison. I'm talking about UK news publications, not US politicians.
Well the UK government have started the blame game, let’s see how they explain away, about how they knew that hospitals were sending out infected patients to care homes, yet allowed this to continue for quite some time after knowing. It looks like they’re going to blame the scientific advice, after repeatedly stating ‘we will only follow scientific advice’.
The scientific community are are ready prepared for that one. I doubt the intellectual force of the government will be much of a match against them.
Cherry picking advice that matches a plan for a disastrous ‘herd immunity’ plot won’t hold much water when the general consensus was totally opposed.
of course there is no comparison, but it is despicable and deplorable none the less.
what happened to all of those people and politicians that wanted to tar and feather Michelle and Barack Obama for this,
do you know how those demons would have reacted if she had went on television and told people this
woe are these professional feigned outrage detractors who employ these blame the media distraction tactics, it's getting so tired and they act like the public doesn't know it's not the media that is the President of the United States and in charge of addressing this epidemic, it's the commander and chief poor excuse for a President Donald Trump, the charlatan out there suggesting people to take disinfectants and dangerous medicines.
what kind of people elect these kind of people.....
Pamela Karlan.