Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

OT: I live in the US and I voted today!

1192022242530

Comments

  • edited November 2020

    @Tarekith said:
    In other news, this made me laugh like nothing else

    This is awesome.

  • @iOSTRAKON said:
    @kurth

    The problem with conspiracy theories is that they start to control you (looking at you). Simply because you can’t do anything about them. You have this sense that everything is out to get you and spend your time babbling to people on the internet trying to convert them.

    @muzka said:
    This is mostly a good read and lots of positivity

    Im just happy it hasn't derailed into accusing tom hanks of drinking virgin child blood to appease oprahs satanic cult or accusing pizza shops of child trafficking lol

    That’s back when he was investigating PAGAN.

  • @kurth said:

    @sippy_cup said:
    @kurth you've presented nothing but invalidated articles and hypercritical opinions of anyone that opposes you. You have ostracized yourself from basically everyone here. I have to question why you keep commenting here, why not go somewhere where people are more susceptible to the outlandish claims you present. I don't think many here give two fucks about your absurd opinions.

    I don't know suppy but it looks like they're mostly talking to me, or about me, referring to me. I do believe they do give a fuck because I'm the one calling bs to their game. I'm a hurdle they have to jump , when I counter their equally outlandish and indoctrinated claims they, and you make. You're living in a bubble. You're indoctrinated to accept what you're told is correct. Maybe.....something in your water? Fluoride perhaps. It's known to make humans dumber. Not in your case of course. But have you had it checked ?

    You're not a hurdle we have to jump. You're a wanker that people want to avoid.

  • Worrying about all of this “deep state” stuff is a defense mechanism against dealing with reality. I choose to focus my energy on the things I can control and find ways to adapt and deal with the things I can’t. I will stand up for change when I believe in an idea, but I’m not looking for things hidden in the shadows at every turn.

  • The identity of @kurth has been exposed.

  • I wonder if it is time for this thread to sink. For a ton of pages now, the discussion has been about baseless conspiracy theories dominated by one person who has become increasingly dismissive and insulting and not about the thread topic.

  • @espiegel123 said:
    I wonder if it is time for this thread to sink. For a ton of pages now, the discussion has been about baseless conspiracy theories dominated by one person who has become increasingly dismissive and insulting and not about the thread topic.

    +10

  • From the Atlantic article posted above (the “seekers” mentioned were an apocalyptic group in the fifties)...

    “The psychologists who studied the seekers attributed their rationalizations to the discomfort of cognitive dissonance: When a true believer is faced with “undeniable evidence” that what he believes is wrong, he “will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.”

    The question of whether Trumpism has a long-term future in the GOP will be debated at length in the coming months. What’s certain is that it won’t be vanquished by Trump’s impending defeat alone—if anything, his most devoted supporters may be further radicalized.”

    Although I agree this thread has been derailed, it is hard for me not to remember that 70 mil are opposed to Biden’s presidency. At least Netanyahu is up for it. Qualified celebration seems about the best we can do. And that’s pretty damn good considering how. I’d be feeling if Trump was the winner.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @LinearLineman said:
    From the Atlantic article posted above (the “seekers” mentioned were an apocalyptic group in the fifties)...

    “The psychologists who studied the seekers attributed their rationalizations to the discomfort of cognitive dissonance: When a true believer is faced with “undeniable evidence” that what he believes is wrong, he “will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.”

    The question of whether Trumpism has a long-term future in the GOP will be debated at length in the coming months. What’s certain is that it won’t be vanquished by Trump’s impending defeat alone—if anything, his most devoted supporters may be further radicalized.”

    Although I agree this thread has been derailed, it is hard for me not to remember that 70 mil are opposed to Biden’s presidency. At least Netanyahu is up for it. Qualified celebration seems about the best we can do. And that’s pretty damn good considering how. I’d be feeling if Trump was the winner.

    Everyone avoids cognitive dissonance. The closer a belief is held the closer it is to the core of your psychological identity. Cultists (and conspiracy minded persons) hold their beliefs the closest and, avoid the cognitive dissonance any self contradictory evidence even between their beliefs by just ignoring them and digging in harder and angrier. Just like @LinearLineman and many articles from psychologists have said - they become more radicalized.

    There are several approaches you can use to talk to people like this none of them include rattling off facts like a machine gun. You have to jimmy that can open a bit at a time by letting them talk to find out what their concerns are. Then address those concerns from your frame of reference - that is tell them how you would, as a person or a group, solve those problems.

    YouTube videos and game forums and other online groups have been used to radicalize and polarize people. Sometimes by doing the very thing mentioned above. A person who is distressed by a failed relationship is approached with compassion and camaraderie and given support and encouragement then bit by bit is fed ever increasing paranoia and anger in the guise of self empowerment.

    Programming and deprogramming people from cult-like behavior uses the same technique. Kind of fucked up. The only difference being going into a cult the cult is looking to control you. Getting out the persons helping are looking out for nothing but your independence.

  • Everyone go make music

  • @SNystrom said:

    @kurth said:
    well good. Armed republicans ...not breaking any laws...not burning down any buildings or innocent people's businesses are ok w/me. The US constitution gives them the right . And looks like trumps gonna rip the country a new AH.... jajaja https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-legal-moves-top-republicans-mum-projected-biden-win

    >

    Yeah, sounds pretty benign to me:

    And so, at Bannon’s Election Night party, bravado reigned. When I asked Harlan Hill, a Trump-campaign adviser, how he was feeling about the race, he responded emphatically: “Oh, he’s gonna win.

    One hundred percent.”
    “You’re that confident?” I asked.  

    “Absolutely.”

    “And if it goes the other way …”

    “I’ll eat my shoe. We’ll do it in a live-stream.”

    Of course, as the race turned against Trump in the days that followed, Hill was not browsing recipes for boiled loafers. He was tweeting furiously about a massive—and entirely fabricated—conspiracy to steal the election from the president. “I’m going to Philly tomorrow with a team,” he announced on Twitter Thursday. “This is war.”

    When the MAGA Bubble Burst - The Atlantic
    https://apple.news/AH6WldvRARSueKegUXRVxBg

    This was a report from Steve Bannon's election "victory party. I'm sure he's also pretty benign in your book.

    He said this a couple days ago:

    “Second term kicks off with firing Wray, firing Fauci"
    OK, that’s not very nice. Fauci is Fauci. And Wray is Christopher Wray, the Director of the CIA.

    “No, I actually want to go a step farther but the president is a kind-hearted man and a good man.

    I’d actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England. I’d put their heads on pikes, right, I’d put them at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats, you either get with the program or you’re gone.”

    FYI: Bannon served as White House Chief Strategist for U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Also, anyone who has watched Donnie over the past four years realizes that no, Trump is not a kind-hearted man. He is not a good man. He is the furthest thing from it.

    Bannon still shares his "strategies" with Donnie. Consider that for a moment.

    hey first...the 52nd time... i don't support trump ...bannon's a sleaseball with more money than brains...but you don't even know who's who and works where. Gina haspel cia should be fired...she's a war criminal. Fauci ...trump does get to choose appointable positions, but fauci...the guy's a prophet. After all . in 2017, he prophesied trump would have an infectious pandemic during his administration. The guy's a prophet. > @sippy_cup said:

    @kurth said:

    @sippy_cup said:
    @kurth you've presented nothing but invalidated articles and hypercritical opinions of anyone that opposes you. You have ostracized yourself from basically everyone here. I have to question why you keep commenting here, why not go somewhere where people are more susceptible to the outlandish claims you present. I don't think many here give two fucks about your absurd opinions.

    I don't know suppy but it looks like they're mostly talking to me, or about me, referring to me. I do believe they do give a fuck because I'm the one calling bs to their game. I'm a hurdle they have to jump , when I counter their equally outlandish and indoctrinated claims they, and you make. You're living in a bubble. You're indoctrinated to accept what you're told is correct. Maybe.....something in your water? Fluoride perhaps. It's known to make humans dumber. Not in your case of course. But have you had it checked ?

    You're not a hurdle we have to jump. You're a wanker that people want to avoid.

    then you sure waste alot of time on me. Even dedicating art. And without saying anything of note.

  • @LinearLineman said:
    From the Atlantic article posted above (the “seekers” mentioned were an apocalyptic group in the fifties)...

    “The psychologists who studied the seekers attributed their rationalizations to the discomfort of cognitive dissonance: When a true believer is faced with “undeniable evidence” that what he believes is wrong, he “will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.”

    The question of whether Trumpism has a long-term future in the GOP will be debated at length in the coming months. What’s certain is that it won’t be vanquished by Trump’s impending defeat alone—if anything, his most devoted supporters may be further radicalized.”

    Although I agree this thread has been derailed, it is hard for me not to remember that 70 mil are opposed to Biden’s presidency. At least Netanyahu is up for it. Qualified celebration seems about the best we can do. And that’s pretty damn good considering how. I’d be feeling if Trump was the winner.

    netanyahu is one of the worst war criminals on the planet. Please spend some moments reading mondoweiss.

  • @Max23 said:

    he already had a total meltdown live on TV and the whole world watched it.
    He will never recover from this.

    Yeah it was a painful watch, but I think that's just the tip of the iceberg, he'll try to wreak as much havoc as possible before he goes out of office.

  • edited November 2020

    @kurth. Totally agree. Just an example of the rats deserting a sinking ship. But please, stop thinking (or expressing) that you have to educate everyone on everything. It’s not a vey successful proselytizing approach.

  • edited November 2020

    @michael_m said:

    @kurth said:

    @michael_m said:

    @SNystrom said:
    Yeah, would have been nice to just have 24 hours to celebrate the election.

    Oh well.

    Yeah, it’s a shame this thread has been derailed so much and that wiping the slate clean and a chance for real change aren’t what we’re discussing.

    the supreme court will most likely decide the elections real outcome , regardless what mass media is saying. lets see what corrupt little dealing have been underfoot. watch the suckerpunch ..... https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-election-lawsuits-biden-jenna-ellis

    I doubt that the Supreme Court will do anything. Every state and federal judge so far that has thrown out a case has done so because of lack of evidence, and nothing seems to have changed.

    Just take off the tin foil hat and enjoy the moment of this being over. I

    are you a lawyer ? Nope, didn't think so. I inform my opinions. You think the sc can deny review of a valid ( if he has evidence of dems corruption ) suit for the election? Wrong again. Doesn't make a difference how many state, or federal judges toss out suits by the trunk full. Actually that's his preferred strategy...to take everything to the sc...where he has some allies.

  • edited November 2020

    Well, he has to present evidence of that @kurth. So far he has produced no evidence of any evidence. “Evidence? I don’t need no stinking evidence!”

    It seems unlikely the SCOTUS would rule along partisan lines. Only three justices are beholding in any way to Trump.

  • @LinearLineman said:
    @kurth. Totally agree. Just an example of the rats deserting a sinking ship. But please, stop thinking (or expressing) that you have to educate everyone on everything. It’s not a vey successful proselytizing approach.

    you're the only person I responded to, that didn't respond to, or about me directly....first. I took that liberty because perhaps you need saving....a favor like you attempted choosing to do for me, or at least that's what you said.

  • That ignore button works pretty good... ahhhh inner peace

  • @audiblevideo said:
    That ignore button works pretty good... ahhhh inner peace

    I completely forgot about that option! Have never needed to use it until now.

  • edited November 2020

    @audiblevideo said:

    @LinearLineman said:
    From the Atlantic article posted above (the “seekers” mentioned were an apocalyptic group in the fifties)...

    “The psychologists who studied the seekers attributed their rationalizations to the discomfort of cognitive dissonance: When a true believer is faced with “undeniable evidence” that what he believes is wrong, he “will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.”

    The question of whether Trumpism has a long-term future in the GOP will be debated at length in the coming months. What’s certain is that it won’t be vanquished by Trump’s impending defeat alone—if anything, his most devoted supporters may be further radicalized.”

    Although I agree this thread has been derailed, it is hard for me not to remember that 70 mil are opposed to Biden’s presidency. At least Netanyahu is up for it. Qualified celebration seems about the best we can do. And that’s pretty damn good considering how. I’d be feeling if Trump was the winner.

    Everyone avoids cognitive dissonance. The closer a belief is held the closer it is to the core of your psychological identity. Cultists (and conspiracy minded persons) hold their beliefs the closest and, avoid the cognitive dissonance any self contradictory evidence even between their beliefs by just ignoring them and digging in harder and angrier. Just like @LinearLineman and many articles from psychologists have said - they become more radicalized.

    There are several approaches you can use to talk to people like this none of them include rattling off facts like a machine gun. You have to jimmy that can open a bit at a time by letting them talk to find out what their concerns are. Then address those concerns from your frame of reference - that is tell them how you would, as a person or a group, solve those problems.

    YouTube videos and game forums and other online groups have been used to radicalize and polarize people. Sometimes by doing the very thing mentioned above. A person who is distressed by a failed relationship is approached with compassion and camaraderie and given support and encouragement then bit by bit is fed ever increasing paranoia and anger in the guise of self empowerment.

    Programming and deprogramming people from cult-like behavior uses the same technique. Kind of fucked up. The only difference being going into a cult the cult is looking to control you. Getting out the persons helping are looking out for nothing but your independence.

    actually the forum has produced little evidence of anything concrete to support their ideas. I did most of the linking. Mostly they say " the general consensus says " jajaja, like the good true believer you describe. Their bible said. And I know you're simpleton argument, it's obvious. But if you just reverse your implied target ....to america is the cult, and you people are card carrying members....it makes far more sense. And not all people avoid cognitive dissonance . Some people relish the confrontation of ideas.There's no other discipline of greater pseudo science than psychology. .....and there's no other people more self righteous than americans.

    ""They must have an awareness of the inconsistency to feel discomfort. Not everyone experiences cognitive dissonance to the same degree. Some people have a higher tolerance for uncertainty and inconsistency and may experience less cognitive dissonance than those who require consistency.'"

    ...and while it's easy to see why you would try to squirm out of the difficult idea that your own government would murder it's own citizens in it's goal of domination, you can never escape guilt of the real and documented war crimes it's committed in your name.

  • @sippy_cup said:

    @yowza said:
    I ignored the conspiracy theorist a few days ago but based on quotes here from his other posts it confirms what I thought, that he is a closet Trumpist because he speaks the same fringe conspiracy language with no basis in reality. I’m so relieved my BS detector is still intact, I was beginning to think I’d lost that mojo.

    Yes he has the Trump approach down.

    1. Present baseless claim
    2. Fortify baselessness with baseless references ("go search google" he says)
    3. defend lack of base with anger and mindless insults
    4. Continue senseless insults with coupled with the inability to be wrong.
    5. Attempt to invalidate peoples opinions on him by continuing to insult them

    obviously you can't handle what you dish out in spades. Like I said....cry babies.

  • Good things that have come out of this thread:
    The link to that Atlantic article.
    The reminder that @JohnnyGoodyear is an ACE fraud spotter.
    The frantically entertaining link dump from Our Man in “Mexico” (sure, Jan).
    The examples of reasonableness beyond belief from @cian and @espiegel123.

    I’m happy to be a witness to this robust discussion. But I wouldn’t be sad if the thread closed down.

  • @kurth said:

    @michael_m said:

    @kurth said:

    @michael_m said:

    @SNystrom said:
    Yeah, would have been nice to just have 24 hours to celebrate the election.

    Oh well.

    Yeah, it’s a shame this thread has been derailed so much and that wiping the slate clean and a chance for real change aren’t what we’re discussing.

    the supreme court will most likely decide the elections real outcome , regardless what mass media is saying. lets see what corrupt little dealing have been underfoot. watch the suckerpunch ..... https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-election-lawsuits-biden-jenna-ellis

    I doubt that the Supreme Court will do anything. Every state and federal judge so far that has thrown out a case has done so because of lack of evidence, and nothing seems to have changed.

    Just take off the tin foil hat and enjoy the moment of this being over. I

    are you a lawyer ? Nope, didn't think so. I inform my opinions. You think the sc can deny review of a valid ( if he has evidence of dems corruption ) suit for the election? Wrong again. Doesn't make a difference how many state, or federal judges toss out suits by the trunk full. Actually that's his preferred strategy...to take everything to the sc...where he has some allies.

    So what evidence is there then? It doesn’t take a law degree to understand that without evidence there is no case...

  • edited November 2020

    @kurth. I don’t need saving. I wasn’t trying to “save” you. Just stand up for your 1st amendment right Why do you think people need “saving”? Again, better to adjust your language if you are a true proselytizing believer. You want results, don’t you?

  • As the OP of this thread, I wanted to encourage everyone to vote, and I thank everyone who did so.

  • @Crawlingwind said:
    As the OP of this thread, I wanted to encourage everyone to vote, and I thank everyone who did so.

    Thank you.

  • @michael_m said:

    @kurth said:

    @michael_m said:

    @kurth said:

    @michael_m said:

    @SNystrom said:
    Yeah, would have been nice to just have 24 hours to celebrate the election.

    Oh well.

    Yeah, it’s a shame this thread has been derailed so much and that wiping the slate clean and a chance for real change aren’t what we’re discussing.

    the supreme court will most likely decide the elections real outcome , regardless what mass media is saying. lets see what corrupt little dealing have been underfoot. watch the suckerpunch ..... https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-election-lawsuits-biden-jenna-ellis

    I doubt that the Supreme Court will do anything. Every state and federal judge so far that has thrown out a case has done so because of lack of evidence, and nothing seems to have changed.

    Just take off the tin foil hat and enjoy the moment of this being over. I

    are you a lawyer ? Nope, didn't think so. I inform my opinions. You think the sc can deny review of a valid ( if he has evidence of dems corruption ) suit for the election? Wrong again. Doesn't make a difference how many state, or federal judges toss out suits by the trunk full. Actually that's his preferred strategy...to take everything to the sc...where he has some allies.

    So what evidence is there then? It doesn’t take a law degree to understand that without evidence there is no case...

    I think it's a fair assumption to make that trumps legal team will present it in due time. Why would you assume I have access to it.

  • @LinearLineman said:
    @kurth. I don’t need saving. I wasn’t trying to “save” you. Just stand up for your 1st amendment right Why do you think people need “saving”? Again, better to adjust your language if you are a true proselytizing believer. You want results, don’t you?

    It'll take more than me to peel off those confirmed biases around here. But someone's got to storm the castle.

  • @kurth. Again, your logic does not make sense. You seem to have an unshakeable confirmed bias. This is doublethink if you are conscious and you are playing a game. If you are unconscious it is rather sad. Are you lonely and need conversation? Very understandable.

This discussion has been closed.