Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

WTF Will Smith?

11213141618

Comments

  • edited April 2022

    @Jomodu said:
    What a load of old tripe.
    A person slaps another who took a poke at his wife.
    In my pub he would have been punched.
    I mean, a guy slapping another is such a ‘girlie’ thing to do.
    In olden days, everyone would have said ‘ good on you…he asked for it’ …. and got on with everyday life.
    But is this thread an insight into what fills everyone’s mind about what really matters these days?

    Ukraine / Russia is too horrible for some of us to talk about anymore and people are restless so lets make a nebulous fractal out of a minor dustup in order to distract ourselves.

  • edited April 2022

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:
    No you’re deliberately misrepresenting my stance to reinforce your viewpoint PC or cancel culture is choking discussion when it obviously is not.

    The only thing I'm doing deliberately is sharing what I think you've been doing from the start. I don't think either PC or cancel culture is choking the discussion. I think you are.

    You’re talking nonsense I’m choking nothing if people feel uncomfortable that their blind spots are being called out that’s on them not me.

    It seems to me that your version of free speech is only for those with your viewpoint and if anyone challenges that viewpoint or object you claim they are being cancelled.

    Just saying it as I see it. And I'm not denying you your right to speech. In fact, I've said on a few occasions, there's a discussion to be had about this. I just don't think you've either the sense or the sensibility to be having it.
    You've decided that we all have certain blind-spots (Which I've already suggested seems fuelled by nothing but your own prejudice) and that you're the one to call us out. But perhaps we are just a forum of nails at which you can swing Maslow's Hammer.

    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Came down upon our heads
    Do do do doo doo
    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Made sure that we were dead

    I accept that I like everyone else will have my own areas where my views will not be as nuanced as others involved in those areas however I have no issue with admitting that.

    You do like to make it personal don’t you, seems all a bit school yard to me, making up little songs.

  • @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:
    No you’re deliberately misrepresenting my stance to reinforce your viewpoint PC or cancel culture is choking discussion when it obviously is not.

    The only thing I'm doing deliberately is sharing what I think you've been doing from the start. I don't think either PC or cancel culture is choking the discussion. I think you are.

    You’re talking nonsense I’m choking nothing if people feel uncomfortable that their blind spots are being called out that’s on them not me.

    It seems to me that your version of free speech is only for those with your viewpoint and if anyone challenges that viewpoint or object you claim they are being cancelled.

    Just saying it as I see it. And I'm not denying you your right to speech. In fact, I've said on a few occasions, there's a discussion to be had about this. I just don't think you've either the sense or the sensibility to be having it.
    You've decided that we all have certain blind-spots (Which I've already suggested seems fuelled by nothing but your own prejudice) and that you're the one to call us out. But perhaps we are just a forum of nails at which you can swing Maslow's Hammer.

    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Came down upon our heads
    Do do do doo doo
    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Made sure that we were dead

    I accept that I like everyone else will have my own areas where my views will not be as nuanced as others involved in tilde areas however I have no issue with admitting that.

    You do like to make it personal don’t you, seems all a bit school yard to me, making up little songs.

    bye

  • Will Smith was only banned from the Oscars for 10 years.

    We were never allowed in.

  • @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:
    No you’re deliberately misrepresenting my stance to reinforce your viewpoint PC or cancel culture is choking discussion when it obviously is not.

    The only thing I'm doing deliberately is sharing what I think you've been doing from the start. I don't think either PC or cancel culture is choking the discussion. I think you are.

    You’re talking nonsense I’m choking nothing if people feel uncomfortable that their blind spots are being called out that’s on them not me.

    It seems to me that your version of free speech is only for those with your viewpoint and if anyone challenges that viewpoint or object you claim they are being cancelled.

    Just saying it as I see it. And I'm not denying you your right to speech. In fact, I've said on a few occasions, there's a discussion to be had about this. I just don't think you've either the sense or the sensibility to be having it.
    You've decided that we all have certain blind-spots (Which I've already suggested seems fuelled by nothing but your own prejudice) and that you're the one to call us out. But perhaps we are just a forum of nails at which you can swing Maslow's Hammer.

    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Came down upon our heads
    Do do do doo doo
    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Made sure that we were dead

    I accept that I like everyone else will have my own areas where my views will not be as nuanced as others involved in tilde areas however I have no issue with admitting that.

    You do like to make it personal don’t you, seems all a bit school yard to me, making up little songs.

    bye

    Just calling it as I see it.

    Bye Felicia

  • One way to show one isn’t racist is to not be offended and defensive if the possibility that racism plays into your point of view is raised.

    There are thoughtful ways of having a conversation and disagreeing.

    One of the ways we can reduce racism is to listen and understand why someone feels racism may play a role in a conversation even if you disagree.

    Giving people space to express themselves without attacking them is important. Even if you disagree with them, allow yourself to consider that maybe your wrong.

  • @CRAKROX said:

    @espiegel123 said:

    One way to show one isn’t racist is to not be offended and defensive if the possibility that racism plays into your point of view is raised.

    There are thoughtful ways of having a conversation and disagreeing.

    One of the ways we can reduce racism is to listen and understand why someone feels racism may play a role in a conversation even if you disagree.

    Giving people space to express themselves without attacking them is important. Even if you disagree with them, allow yourself to consider that maybe your wrong.

    Indeed true, but having read, the Guardian article twice, I think it’s still hollow, nonsensical, neo-liberal rubbish. That intends only to divide.

  • @knewspeak : is that your notion of respectful disagreement?

  • @espiegel123 said:
    @knewspeak : is that your notion of respectful disagreement?

    With that article, yes.

  • @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @el_bo said:

    @CRAKROX said:
    No you’re deliberately misrepresenting my stance to reinforce your viewpoint PC or cancel culture is choking discussion when it obviously is not.

    The only thing I'm doing deliberately is sharing what I think you've been doing from the start. I don't think either PC or cancel culture is choking the discussion. I think you are.

    You’re talking nonsense I’m choking nothing if people feel uncomfortable that their blind spots are being called out that’s on them not me.

    It seems to me that your version of free speech is only for those with your viewpoint and if anyone challenges that viewpoint or object you claim they are being cancelled.

    Just saying it as I see it. And I'm not denying you your right to speech. In fact, I've said on a few occasions, there's a discussion to be had about this. I just don't think you've either the sense or the sensibility to be having it.
    You've decided that we all have certain blind-spots (Which I've already suggested seems fuelled by nothing but your own prejudice) and that you're the one to call us out. But perhaps we are just a forum of nails at which you can swing Maslow's Hammer.

    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Came down upon our heads
    Do do do doo doo
    Bang! bang! CRAKROX' silver hammer
    Made sure that we were dead

    I accept that I like everyone else will have my own areas where my views will not be as nuanced as others involved in tilde areas however I have no issue with admitting that.

    You do like to make it personal don’t you, seems all a bit school yard to me, making up little songs.

    bye

    Just calling it as I see it.

    Bye Felicia

    When people hear the name Felicia, they perceive you as someone who is full of life, uplifting, inspiring, and even charming. You are the life of the party with your lively, intelligent, and witty personality. Others will find you as strikingly attractive and like being the center of attention.

  • McDMcD
    edited April 2022

    The horse being whipped here smells like "identity politics".

    If you have an identity you are subject to it's interpersonal dynamics.

    One of the new issues coming out of this debate is the concept of "divisiveness" which often seems to be used to justify ideas that are used to push down a minority requesting equal treatment.

    It's a logical inversion of discrimination that seeks to ignore race to protect people that do not suffer from systemic discrimination but will call out consideration of any identity they are not a member of... muslim, LGTBQ, Latinx, Black, etc.

    It's tribal loyalty in a new world order. Almost impossible NOT to participate. And very easily to use to generate righteous indignation for being accused of exhibiting bias.

    Time for Will to be banned from this forum for 10 years, I think.

    I'm very proud that this forum does NOT play identity politics w.r.t. music but embraces all forms of music made with the love of sound as an art form. There are other forums for tribal music devotees.

    The main benefit of diversity is the option to learn new perspectives from someone that lives a different life from yours.

    Felicia can teach you something if you're open to new perspectives. Or you can assemble a mob and throw some stones.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @espiegel123 said:

    One way to show one isn’t racist is to not be offended and defensive if the possibility that racism plays into your point of view is raised.

    There are thoughtful ways of having a conversation and disagreeing.

    One of the ways we can reduce racism is to listen and understand why someone feels racism may play a role in a conversation even if you disagree.

    Giving people space to express themselves without attacking them is important. Even if you disagree with them, allow yourself to consider that maybe your wrong.

    Indeed true, but having read, the Guardian article twice, I think it’s still hollow, nonsensical, neo-liberal rubbish. That intends only to divide.

    Weird you think that as it’s the the other side that uses the politics of division, just look at how the right in both the U.S. and U.K. / E.U. has weaponised the immigration debate along the lines of race.

    The outcry from the right for example when the U.K. announced it was accepting refugees from Syria was loud and long but they were weirdly silent about us accepting refugees from Ukraine, the only obvious difference between two groups being a skin tone.

  • Time to share my thoughts. I see some people are trying to be polite and wordy, but I'll be blunt and get to the heart of it. First of all, there really are no such things as "political correctness", "cancel culture", or any of the buzzwords invented by rightwing white people to try and ignore the issues minorities face (whether the minorities are of a different race, different gender, different sexual orientation, etc) and justify their biases.

    On the other hand, if a white person wants a better understanding of what Will Smith's slap did and all the implications it has without being "oh so offended" (I put that in quotes, because offense is always taken, never given), they can read Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's substack post.

    https://kareem.substack.com/p/will-smith-did-a-bad-bad-thing?s=r

    And I can see how the Guardian article can "offend" some white people as it is provoking (but really should provoke thought rather than outrage), but if Kareem's words are also "offensive" and the person thinks "oh, Black people are always complaining", now is the time for them to do some introspection and gain a better understanding and empathy.

    @CRAKROX said:
    Just look at how the right in both the U.S. and U.K. / E.U. has weaponised the immigration debate along the lines of race.

    Exactly. One of my family members sadly is like that. They posted some meme on Facebook stating "we (meaning White folks) came over the border the correct way" or some shit like that, implying that undocumented Mexican immigrants are "doing it incorrectly". Really? So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

  • @CRAKROX said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @CRAKROX said:

    @espiegel123 said:

    One way to show one isn’t racist is to not be offended and defensive if the possibility that racism plays into your point of view is raised.

    There are thoughtful ways of having a conversation and disagreeing.

    One of the ways we can reduce racism is to listen and understand why someone feels racism may play a role in a conversation even if you disagree.

    Giving people space to express themselves without attacking them is important. Even if you disagree with them, allow yourself to consider that maybe your wrong.

    Indeed true, but having read, the Guardian article twice, I think it’s still hollow, nonsensical, neo-liberal rubbish. That intends only to divide.

    Weird you think that as it’s the the other side that uses the politics of division, just look at how the right in both the U.S. and U.K. / E.U. has weaponised the immigration debate along the lines of race.

    The outcry from the right for example when the U.K. announced it was accepting refugees from Syria was loud and long but they were weirdly silent about us accepting refugees from Ukraine, the only obvious difference between two groups being a skin tone.

    If you look at the Dimitri thread, you will find my opinion about the UK government’s hypocrisy about immigration.

  • >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

  • @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

  • @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

    People who say dumb things and face consequences are equal to genocide and slavery?????

  • @CRAKROX said:
    The outcry from the right for example when the U.K. announced it was accepting refugees from Syria was loud and long but they were weirdly silent about us accepting refugees from Ukraine, the only obvious difference between two groups being a skin tone.

    The "only obvious difference"... hardly.

    Syria represents a civil war between Shiite and Sunni Muslims with the outside participation of ISIS and the Islamic State. So, religion and sectarian violence factors into the situation.

    Ukrainians are the nexus of a proxy war between Russia and NATO. More of a victim that is a pawn on the world stage of geo-politics. NOTE: Ukrainians are also known to be pretty racist but they did elect a Jewish President without showing religion as a barrier to leadership. They went with an anti-corruption patriot.

    Skin tone would be a factor but taking it in isolation seems a little myopic and opportunistic when there are other reasons to consider.

  • edited April 2022

    @McD said:

    @CRAKROX said:
    The outcry from the right for example when the U.K. announced it was accepting refugees from Syria was loud and long but they were weirdly silent about us accepting refugees from Ukraine, the only obvious difference between two groups being a skin tone.

    The "only obvious difference"... hardly.

    Syria represents a civil war between Shiite and Sunni Muslims with the outside participation of ISIS and the Islamic State. So, religion and sectarian violence factors into the situation.

    Ukrainians are the nexus of a proxy war between Russia and NATO. More of a victim that is a pawn on the world stage of geo-politics. NOTE: Ukrainians are also known to be pretty racist but they did elect a Jewish President without showing religion as a barrier to leadership. They went with an anti-corruption patriot.

    Skin tone would be a factor but taking it in isolation seems a little myopic and opportunistic when there are other reasons to consider.

    From a journalist who was there…
    “Here’s the irony: the Syrians and the Ukrainians flee the same aggressor.

    In Syria's 11-year-long war, it has been Russia helping the Syrian regime flatten cities like Aleppo and Homs into submission, just as they are doing now in places like Mariupol and Kharkiv.”

    Personally the whys and wherefores of the conflicts are pretty irrelevant, I see people fleeing war and hope my country will offer refuge to them irrespective of their skin colour, the fact that we haven’t disgusts me.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

    So, somehow historical facts about the atrocities that happened in US History equates to made up "cancel culture" in your mind? Remember, ignorance is a choice. Educate yourself on history and how the effects of what happened still affect People of Colour and Indigenous Americans in modern Western society.

  • @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

    So, somehow historical facts about the atrocities that happened in US History equates to made up "cancel culture" in your mind? Remember, ignorance is a choice. Educate yourself on history and how the effects of what happened still affect People of Colour and Indigenous Americans in modern Western society.

    I have studied history, are you responsible for those atrocities and injustice’s that happened?

  • @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

    So, somehow historical facts about the atrocities that happened in US History equates to made up "cancel culture" in your mind? Remember, ignorance is a choice. Educate yourself on history and how the effects of what happened still affect People of Colour and Indigenous Americans in modern Western society.

    I have studied history, are you responsible for those atrocities and injustice’s that happened?

    Of course not. In fact, my Irish and Polish ancestors came over after slavery was abolished. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean I don't have white privilege. That doesn't mean most of US society doesn't view me more favourably than a person of colour. That doesn't mean police will stop me because of my skin colour.

    And one of the reasons I am the way that I am is my mother was a closet racist, hated my sister's husband because he is Mexican, and always viewed Black people as "less than" and "thugs", never caring to hear their side of the story and understand anything with an open mind.

    And I'm willing to bet the version of US History you studied in school hailed Christopher Columbus as some sort of folklore hero when in fact he never "discovered" North America to begin with (as well as he and his men committing several atrocities of their own), and I bet you've never taken any history course dealing with US Black History let alone the History of the US 1960s.

    And in case you did and think the Civil Rights Movement ended with the "I Have a Dream Speech", it didn't. The Civil Rights Movement gained traction with that speech and hasn't ever stopped.

  • It seems to me that recent posts here provide (inadvertently, I guess) ample demonstration that "cancel culture” has no special meaning and doesn’t refer to some new phenomenon that needs a new coinage. It just telegraphs the speaker’s attitude.

  • Who’s Felicia? Karen’s sister-in-law?

    Age Of Inhumanity - Age of Reason - Age Of Materialism - Age Of Meism - Age Of Idiocy - Age Of Inanity - Age Of Insanity - Age Of Inhumanity. Round and round we go.

  • McDMcD
    edited April 2022

    DJ Jazzy Jeff has been a musical collaborator with Will Smith since the 80s. He has issued a statement in a clip on Instagram.

    "I can name 50 times that he should've smacked the shit out of somebody and he didn't."

    This was a very uncharacteristic action.

  • @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @knewspeak said:

    >

    So...caucasians invading Native American lands, committing genocide, colonizing, etc is "the right way"? Enslaving people of colour is "the right way"? Holding hard and fast to biases against Black people for centuries is "the right way"?

    And you say cancel culture doesn’t exist, yet that’s what you describe.

    So how is this "cancel culture" exactly? Enlighten me.

    The wilful destruction of the Native American culture by White colonialism and the forced enslavement of Black peoples of Africa.

    So, somehow historical facts about the atrocities that happened in US History equates to made up "cancel culture" in your mind? Remember, ignorance is a choice. Educate yourself on history and how the effects of what happened still affect People of Colour and Indigenous Americans in modern Western society.

    I have studied history, are you responsible for those atrocities and injustice’s that happened?

    Of course not. In fact, my Irish and Polish ancestors came over after slavery was abolished. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean I don't have white privilege. That doesn't mean most of US society doesn't view me more favourably than a person of colour. That doesn't mean police will stop me because of my skin colour.

    And one of the reasons I am the way that I am is my mother was a closet racist, hated my sister's husband because he is Mexican, and always viewed Black people as "less than" and "thugs", never caring to hear their side of the story and understand anything with an open mind.

    And I'm willing to bet the version of US History you studied in school hailed Christopher Columbus as some sort of folklore hero when in fact he never "discovered" North America to begin with (as well as he and his men committing several atrocities of their own), and I bet you've never taken any history course dealing with US Black History let alone the History of the US 1960s.

    And in case you did and think the Civil Rights Movement ended with the "I Have a Dream Speech", it didn't. The Civil Rights Movement gained traction with that speech and hasn't ever stopped.

    My education didn’t stop, but as ‘western civilisation’ we have much to rediscover from older cultures, we may then recover our collective amnesia.

  • @espiegel123 said:
    It seems to me that recent posts here provide (inadvertently, I guess) ample demonstration that "cancel culture” has no special meaning and doesn’t refer to some new phenomenon that needs a new coinage. It just telegraphs the speaker’s attitude.

    Word’s are often clumsy tools, who knows someday we may learn the language of thought, then we may come to truly know the mirror image.

  • @espiegel123 said:
    One way to show one isn’t racist is to not be offended and defensive if the possibility that racism plays into your point of view is raised.

    Or...Occam's Razor: That having one group of people accuse random strangers of racism, sexism...or anything, with zero understanding of their backgrounds, the lives they've lived or indeed the many ways in which they've had to 'check' many things in their lives, is offensive; More so, when one considers that the original charge was asserted with zero discernment or discrimination (albeit very discriminating) against the entirety of white humans.

    If these discussions are to be had, they need to be conducted with extreme sensitivity and attention to detail/nuance and not as a result of someone flinging broad-brush accusations at the entirety of the white contingent of this forum, who dared comment on a piece of topical news, that happened to involve 3 black actors

    @espiegel123 said:
    One of the ways we can reduce racism is to listen and understand why someone feels racism may play a role in a conversation even if you disagree.

    This is of course true. But that doesn't necessarily mean that that person is right, on every occasion. Context matters, doesn't it? I think that someone in this thread has not made any convincing arguments as to why only black people are allowed to have an opinion on this specific incident. I didn't read the 'The Guardian' link provided, but I did check out the first.

    I'm not seeing the link between the awful treatment of the black community as a whole, both historically and currently, and my not being allowed to have an opinion on this Oscars event. perhaps you could walk me through it.

This discussion has been closed.