Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Looks like FCP and LP coming to iPad

1202123252637

Comments

  • Apple must have new larger iPad models waiting in the wings to sell, I don't think they would be releasing these apps otherwise. Without any other desktop types of apps available it would be hard to justify trying to push them.

    I'm surprised they haven't gone with more options which would be more appealing to users, because I don't think it will be enough for most people judging from the reaction even from a lot of die-hard Logic fans who wanted it, who won't subscribe. They should have gone with the Resolve method of two versions, a free Logic and Logic Studio with more higher end features (+ a sub option) all only available on M1 or newer hardware, Studio being $99 and updating that every few years with a new purchase. I think they would probably make more money from that and sell more hardware. The free version could also hook some newer users who use other apps more.

    But they don't care about the ipad only users here, they're aiming this at Mac Logic users who will sub sometimes when they're mobile, on location etc. in which case they should give more sub options, eg sub for a week, that would be more fair, more choice is good :)

  • edited May 2023

    The GarageBand Guide:

  • edited May 2023

    I take this as being priced like one would have expected GarageBand Pro…but went all the way and threw the whole Logic in there. That’s the audience.

    And with Stage Manager support you get the full desktop experience…so I imagine the UI elements scale gracefully to fill the entire screen.

    So your new generation of creatives have all their cake and they can eat all of it.

    Sign me up.

    For the users allergic to subscriptions Apple has provided a great antidote.

    In that the Steinberg’s, Motu’s, Ableton’s can scoop up these users by offering traditional pricing models for them. It also buffers against these companies from complaining about Apple underpricing them out of the market. Because Apple has left this market.

    Not only that, these vendors along with Spotify…can completely bypass giving Apple any commission by offering sideloaded software at cough reduced prices.

    Errbody wins.

    Is it May 23rd yet?

  • @ik2000 said:
    Come on folks… I’m laughing at the comments here lambasting Apple for going to a subscription model for the app that many have been calling for. Wake up… get with the 21st century… the subscription business model is here to stay. How many of you actually rent your home versus how many pay a monthly mortgage? If the (what can only be described as small) monthly subscription cost is not a price you want to pay for what will probably be the best DAW on ipad, then that’s fine, but STOP going on about it. You have a choice to go elsewhere. Buy a windows PC and android tablet and do your music thing on that! (This is my final post of subscription of LP)

    Agree 100% here…
    If you don’t like subscription, don’t get Logic Pro for iPad…
    If you think Apple products is too expensive, buy some other “crap” and run some cheap software on a 400 bucks laptop or Android Tablet…
    We other here will certainly enjoy to at last getting Logic Pro to our beloved iPads…

  • I hope that none of our beloved indie developers have been working on a new DAW for iOS...

  • @cyberheater said:
    Think about how much you pay for all those virtual instruments and effects, then add the cost of the buying the host.
    $5 a month seems quite cheap really.

    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…
    Also, to all Apple haters here, I bought Logic Pro X to my Mac the summer of 2013 - ten (10) years later I still have free updates to Logic Pro…
    Thanks Apple!

  • @natuurlijk said:

    @Danny_Mammy said:

    @NeuM said:

    @Danny_Mammy said:
    why do people keep bringing up the so called cheap cost? its really not the point when it comes to subscription. the cost can change each year. It can be doubled if the company wishes.

    It could be, but Apple doesn't need to. They just have to barely cover the cost of development and maintain the software. This same theory was applied to the App Store so people would get used to the idea of having millions of apps at low cost available to them. Logic Pro will be a "loss leader" to sell hardware, but to avoid charges of "unfair competition" (which we keep seeing from places like the EU) they are safer to charge for the product than to give it away for free.

    Apple don't need to but they can if they want to, each year they can change the price easy. that's the subscription rub.
    However price is not the top issue, I want to pay a one off fee for my products. No rentals.

    Will you be subscribing to Logic Pro for iPad? It looks good eh?

    Natuurlijk niet.

  • @BerlinFx said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @BerlinFx said:
    21 pages but very few valuable post as we are in a wait and see . Opinion will be more facts once we all be testing the free period.

    desktop user of Logic have no information about the future of their Logic Pro X too.

    It’s all the music industry which is waiting now not only the iOS community

    Uncertainty indeed, will the desktop be a subs service, separate to the iOS version or one for both systems or will it remain as fully purchasable. Then there’s compatibility. Plugins not available to both systems and hardware.

    Yes all are key questions far beyond only opinion about subscription model that is not new for pro apps at all see Adobe.

    And as I understand it will implement new AI that even doesn’t exist in our Desktop Logic x.

    Ok you will not have Atmos Dolby in the first release , certainly because they rely on Dolby and need to reach an agreement with Sony. But most of the sound engineers doesn’t bother about Dolby Atmos.

    How can you so surely be saying that Logic Pro for iPad lacks support for Dolby Atmos??
    What are your sources? Tell us!!

  • @realdawei said:
    Is it May 23rd yet?

    My fingers are crossed that I can install it on my iPad Pro Gen 2.

  • @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

  • @ErrkaPetti said:

    @cyberheater said:
    Think about how much you pay for all those virtual instruments and effects, then add the cost of the buying the host.
    $5 a month seems quite cheap really.

    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…
    Also, to all Apple haters here, I bought Logic Pro X to my Mac the summer of 2013 - ten (10) years later I still have free updates to Logic Pro…
    Thanks Apple!

    +1 you tell what is reality, many here bought everything cheap but have no idea of the total budget they spend for nothing really professional except perhaps 5 to 10 good apps and IAP . It is far over 1000 usd for many here. Cheap is always expensive at the end even if you use only apps in AUM .

    I came to iOS music only because I was d up of using a mouse with LogicPro X for my hobby but as I don’t need any VST I paid 200 usd in 8 years for my hoby on desktop.

  • @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    How did you find out how much you've spent?

  • @Simon said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

    I reply that any actual apps on actual > @natuurlijk said:

    @LostInFoundation said:
    About subscription (and people saying the ones not liking it are just moaning):
    It would be cool if we could get BOTH choices.

    What if, FOR ONE TIME, instead of arguing between us, we could unite and try to convince Apple to give us the choice?

    If we all start sending Apple requests about a one purchase possibility on top of subscriptions instead of writing it here and then playing the “I’m right and subscriptions are good” “No, I am right and I want to pay and keep what I own” game, maybe we could convince them to give every user what fits better for him.

    Lately some users “class act” worked (see Waves), so maybe we could learn from it and start thinking users acting United DO HAVE some voice on the matter

    No, that won’t work. I don’t think I’ll bother.

    First try the free period and after you will decide if yes or no.

  • @Gavinski said:

    @HotStrange said:

    @ik2000 said:
    Come on folks… I’m laughing at the comments here lambasting Apple for going to a subscription model for the app that many have been calling for. Wake up… get with the 21st century… the subscription business model is here to stay. How many of you actually rent your home versus how many pay a monthly mortgage? If the (what can only be described as small) monthly subscription cost is not a price you want to pay for what will probably be the best DAW on ipad, then that’s fine, but STOP going on about it. You have a choice to go elsewhere. Buy a windows PC and android tablet and do your music thing on that! (This is my final post of subscription of LP)

    Agreed. Everyone wanted it. Now it’s here and some people can’t stop with the ranting about the subscription model, which I think it’s very reasonably priced. If apple would’ve announced it with a $200+ price tag people would be complaining just as much. Hell a few pages back someone mentioned it would’ve been a one time price of $50 which is laughable for something this huge. Kinda disappointing, honestly. Luckily the majority of people seem excited. Just sucks the thread is derailed every 10 comments with the same complaint.

    C'mon, AB Forum is a whingers paradise lol. Yes, you're right, if it was priced at desktop parity as a one off, many people would still be bitching just as hard. Hard crowd here!

    "Been spending mos' my life, livin' in a...."

    And just what is this "one off" idea of which you speak? The first Logic I bought was version 7. I then paid the upgrade to 8, then to 9, then 10...without a second-thought i.e wouldn't have considered expecting a company to put a ton of work into adding new features, squashing bugs etc. without getting paid for it. These were large updates that book-ended many smaller updates.

    It's still an expectation on the desktop side of things.

    But with this product there seems to be a strange dichotomy between either Apple forcing us to own nothing (Happily!) or there being a one-off-payment that will cover everything for evermore.

    The true alternative to the subscription model would/should be a larger upfront investment and then an upgrade fee for each large iterative version jump...which I'm guessing is not what people here are suggesting as the preferred alternative.

  • @Simon said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

    Since that works out at a £200 per year spend, once you take off Logic’s £49 that leaves £151 to spend on other app subscriptions per year.

    If other developers follow suit (I could imagine Korg doing a £49 per year package, for a bit less: Sugarbytes, Eventide etc.), then a lot of small indie devs could be left out in the cold.

    I will most likely be buying Logic for iOS, but I have concerns for the subscription floodgates being opened on desktop and iOS if it takes off.

  • @ErrkaPetti said:

    @BerlinFx said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @BerlinFx said:
    21 pages but very few valuable post as we are in a wait and see . Opinion will be more facts once we all be testing the free period.

    desktop user of Logic have no information about the future of their Logic Pro X too.

    It’s all the music industry which is waiting now not only the iOS community

    Uncertainty indeed, will the desktop be a subs service, separate to the iOS version or one for both systems or will it remain as fully purchasable. Then there’s compatibility. Plugins not available to both systems and hardware.

    Yes all are key questions far beyond only opinion about subscription model that is not new for pro apps at all see Adobe.

    And as I understand it will implement new AI that even doesn’t exist in our Desktop Logic x.

    Ok you will not have Atmos Dolby in the first release , certainly because they rely on Dolby and need to reach an agreement with Sony. But most of the sound engineers doesn’t bother about Dolby Atmos.

    How can you so surely be saying that Logic Pro for iPad lacks support for Dolby Atmos??
    What are your sources? Tell us!!

    From the screen shot of the mixer zooming and oas Atmos is great marketing trick for Apple they should have state it will on their page.

    Not many tracks use Atmos so that change nothing for Logic experience on iOS . I don’t tell it will not be in a later release that the beauty having constant updates on both Logic so new functionality regularly and sound pack.

  • @monz0id said:

    @Simon said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

    Since that works out at a £200 per year spend, once you take off Logic’s £49 that leaves £151 to spend on other app subscriptions per year.

    That's not what I was asking.

    I was interested in ErrkaPetti spend. How many apps were bought for the $3,000 and would they be bought if they were all subs?

  • edited May 2023

    @cyberheater said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    How did you find out how much you've spent?

    Easy - have all recipes left and I took me time this spring to count it (I was curious)…
    The same goes for Apple hardware - I have been spending more than $22000 on Apple hardware the last ten years…

  • edited May 2023

    @el_bo said:

    tl;dr If you like it, subscribe. If not, then don’t.

    P.S i think the sub-dissenters shiuld be represented, but it is getting a bit heavy (We're already literally pissing in people's drinking jars, at this point, and there’s still 2 weeks to go ;) ).

    Fair enough. I certainly don't want to do anything like that to people. I'm fine with walking away from this thread and leaving it to people who think this is more a good than a bad thing. But I see Apple as the one who has pissed on the parade. The person pointing out that the parade is being pissed on is not the one who ruined the parade. I actually have a good friend who has worked for Apple as a programmer for 20 years. He helped launch this project. He completely agrees with me about how it is being marketed. Of course, he and his team have no control over that, and they are trying to be celebratory about it finally reaching completion. This has been in the works for many years. It's just such a disappointment to see something you wanted for so long being "rained on" (we'll call it) by marketing decisions when it finally arrives.

    This situation is very different than what happened recently with Waves. In the Waves case, it was something that users had in their daily workflow for decades that they saw as being taken away from them. I didn't see a single post happy about it. This is not taking away something that was already in place, and is something that people have wanted so badly that it seems many are willing to go along with it. But it is something that will almost certainly have implications far beyond this particular product. It is annoying to hear users try to argue things from the vendor's perspective... This "has to happen in order for companies to stay profitable, etc." We can only guess about such things. We are customers. Our job is to get the best deal we can find, not make the vendor's argument for them. What we do know is: Apple was able to buy Logic from Emagic, kill off the PC version, and cut the price to the point where other DAWs could be put out of business. Surprisingly, that didn't happen. (IMO that was largely due to the fact that Logic had one of the most difficult interfaces to learn, at least at the time. BTW, my Apple-programmer friend I mentioned who worked on this project, is also a musician, and he doesn't use Logic! Like me, he found the interface most "illogical" in many ways.) But the point is, Apple could do this, and lots of other things that other companies couldn't or wouldn't, because their business model was based on selling hardware. And they have become one of the most profitable companies in the world, enabling them to do things, and even steer the industry, like nobody else. I believe they are doing this as part of a larger trend to position themselves as a "services" company. I find that troubling. Best to all my fellow end users!

  • 688 comments.... can we get to 700 in the 2 or so hours before the thread is 24 hours old?

  • @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:

    @Simon said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

    Since that works out at a £200 per year spend, once you take off Logic’s £49 that leaves £151 to spend on other app subscriptions per year.

    That's not what I was asking.

    I was interested in ErrkaPetti spend. How many apps were bought for the $3,000 and would they be bought if they were all subs?

    Ok, that’s what I replied to. Thought I was being helpful, time to put you on ignore.

  • edited May 2023

    @Lady_App_titude said:

    @el_bo said:

    tl;dr If you like it, subscribe. If not, then don’t.

    P.S i think the sub-dissenters shiuld be represented, but it is getting a bit heavy (We're already literally pissing in people's drinking jars, at this point, and there’s still 2 weeks to go ;) ).

    Fair enough. I certainly don't want to do anything like that to people. I'm fine with walking away from this thread and leaving it to people who think this is more a good than a bad thing. But I see Apple as the one who has pissed on the parade. The person pointing out that the parade is being pissed on is not the one who ruined the parade. I actually have a good friend who has worked for Apple as a programmer for 20 years. He helped launch this project. He completely agrees with me about how it is being marketed. Of course, he and his team have no control over that, and they are trying to be celebratory about it finally reaching completion. This has been in the works for many years. It's just such a disappointment to see something you wanted for so long being "rained on" (we'll call it) by marketing decisions when it finally arrives.

    This situation is very different than what happened recently with Waves. In the Waves case, it was something that users had in their daily workflow for decades that they saw as being taken away from them. I didn't see a single post happy about it. This is not taking away something that was already in place, and is something that people have wanted so badly that it seems many are willing to go along with it. But it is something that will almost certainly have implications far beyond this particular product. It is annoying to hear users try to argue things from the vendor's perspective... This "has to happen in order for companies to stay profitable, etc." We can only guess about such things. We are customers. Our job is to get the best deal we can find, not make the vendor's argument for them. What we do know is: Apple was able to buy Logic from Emagic, kill off the PC version, and cut the price to the point where other DAWs could be put out of business. Surprisingly, that didn't happen. (IMO that was largely due to the fact that Logic had one of the most difficult interfaces to learn, at least at the time. BTW, my Apple-programmer friend I mentioned who worked on this project, is also a musician, and he doesn't use Logic! Like me, he found the interface most "illogical" in many ways.) But the point is, Apple could do this, and lots of other things that other companies couldn't or wouldn't, because their business model was based on selling hardware. And they have become one of the most profitable companies in the world, enabling them to do things, and even steer the industry, like nobody else. I believe they are doing this as part of a larger trend to position themselves as a "services" company. I find that troubling. Best to all my fellow end users!

    well said and it's a shame some forum members would have any issue with you making comments regardless of if it is perceived positive or negative.

    it just a discussion...

  • @monz0id said:

    @Simon said:

    @monz0id said:

    @Simon said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    I have spent over $3000 on different music apps and plugins since the presence of Appstore 2008…

    Would you have bought all those apps if they were subscription?

    Since that works out at a £200 per year spend, once you take off Logic’s £49 that leaves £151 to spend on other app subscriptions per year.

    That's not what I was asking.

    I was interested in ErrkaPetti spend. How many apps were bought for the $3,000 and would they be bought if they were all subs?

    Ok, that’s what I replied to. Thought I was being helpful, time to put you on ignore.

    Probably.

  • @ErrkaPetti said:

    @pepebaõ said:

    @Lady_App_titude said:
    How many people have been dreaming of this day? Every single person raises their hand.
    In that dream, how many people were wishing that when it finally arrived it would be subscription. Crickets chirping.

    This feels like.. finally passing the canteen to that thirsty man begging in the desert, and then filling it with piss.

    This guy heard your call

    Don’t listen to this braindead guy - too much smoking drugs that he lost his language and thinking capacity…
    If you don’t like subscription, don’t “buy” Logic Pro for iPad - simple as that…

    This guy's views are a joke. $5/month for logic is not a dystopian nightmare, dude needs to lay off the alex jones and get a job because it looks like he's in his mothers basement at the moment.

  • edited May 2023

    @MAtrixplan said:
    Interesting how much GBs of space we have to prepare.

    Answering for my question from the begining of the discussion:

    6GB of available storage space for minimum installation or 72GB of storage space for full Sound Library installation

    It was taken from LP for MAC page

  • @Lady_App_titude said:

    @el_bo said:

    tl;dr If you like it, subscribe. If not, then don’t.

    P.S i think the sub-dissenters shiuld be represented, but it is getting a bit heavy (We're already literally pissing in people's drinking jars, at this point, and there’s still 2 weeks to go ;) ).

    Fair enough. I certainly don't want to do anything like that to people. I'm fine with walking away from this thread and leaving it to people who think this is more a good than a bad thing. But I see Apple as the one who has pissed on the parade. The person pointing out that the parade is being pissed on is not the one who ruined the parade. I actually have a good friend who has worked for Apple as a programmer for 20 years. He helped launch this project. He completely agrees with me about how it is being marketed. Of course, he and his team have no control over that, and they are trying to be celebratory about it finally reaching completion. This has been in the works for many years. It's just such a disappointment to see something you wanted for so long being "rained on" (we'll call it) by marketing decisions when it finally arrives.

    This situation is very different than what happened recently with Waves. In the Waves case, it was something that users had in their daily workflow for decades that they saw as being taken away from them. I didn't see a single post happy about it. This is not taking away something that was already in place, and is something that people have wanted so badly that it seems many are willing to go along with it. But it is something that will almost certainly have implications far beyond this particular product. It is annoying to hear users try to argue things from the vendor's perspective... This "has to happen in order for companies to stay profitable, etc." We can only guess about such things. We are customers. Our job is to get the best deal we can find, not make the vendor's argument for them. What we do know is: Apple was able to buy Logic from Emagic, kill off the PC version, and cut the price to the point where other DAWs could be put out of business. Surprisingly, that didn't happen. (IMO that was largely due to the fact that Logic had one of the most difficult interfaces to learn, at least at the time. BTW, my Apple-programmer friend I mentioned who worked on this project, is also a musician, and he doesn't use Logic! Like me, he found the interface most "illogical" in many ways.) But the point is, Apple could do this, and lots of other things that other companies couldn't or wouldn't, because their business model was based on selling hardware. And they have become one of the most profitable companies in the world, enabling them to do things, and even steer the industry, like nobody else. I believe they are doing this as part of a larger trend to position themselves as a "services" company. I find that troubling. Best to all my fellow end users!

    I don't see any comparison to Waves, here. They made some serious blunders in their execution, and certainly fuelled the fires of the most cynical of nay-sayers with their 'You rely on us, so bend the knee' approach. They completely swept the proverbial carpet from under the proverbial feet of their customers. In this case, Apple is introducing a product that hadn't previously existed in a particular space, and priced it in a way that allows more people to 'play', without a huge investment and zero commitment (One doesn't necessarily have to 'rent' every month of the year).

    @Lady_App_titude said: "It is annoying to hear users try to argue things from the vendor's perspective... This "has to happen in order for companies to stay profitable, etc." We can only guess about such things. We are customers. Our job is to get the best deal we can find, not make the vendor's argument for them."

    Huh?!? I have no interest in the tribal 'us vs them', 'consumers against tyrannical corporations' mentality. i'm interested in the truth, and when that can't be accurately determined, at the very least, fair representation when speculating. I certainly have no role or "job" that dictates what I should prioritise as a consumer. But just in case it wasn't clear, i do absolutely believe that consumers only considering the best deal they can get has the same potential negatives for the marketplace, as only considering oneself has negative impacts on any area of life.

    I am no Apple fan-boy, by the way. I can't stand a lot about how they operate. But as long as they still edge ahead in my pros vs cons list, I'll stick with their products. But I'm OS-agnostic, DAW-agnostic, and whatever-agnostic. These are all just tools, to be used towards specific ends. Choose the tools that get you to your specific 'end', with as much joy and as few headaches as possible.

  • @MAtrixplan said:
    6GB of available storage space for minimum installation or 72GB of storage space for full Sound Library installation

    That's quite a bit. Thanks for letting me know.

  • @richardyot said:

    @Littlewoodg said:
    i subscribe to chess apps
    and i suck at chess, so…

    i haven’t read the thread (impatience, probably why i suck at chess)
    does the ipad version have Live Loops feature (the clip laincher)
    seems a no brainer on ipad

    Yes Live Loops is included according to Apple’s product page

    thanks @richardyot

    I havent kept up with the thread, and you may have already answered, but I was curious whats your thinking on this upcoming release?

  • edited May 2023

    @Danny_Mammy said:

    @Lady_App_titude said:

    @el_bo said:

    tl;dr If you like it, subscribe. If not, then don’t.

    P.S i think the sub-dissenters shiuld be represented, but it is getting a bit heavy (We're already literally pissing in people's drinking jars, at this point, and there’s still 2 weeks to go ;) ).

    Fair enough. I certainly don't want to do anything like that to people. I'm fine with walking away from this thread and leaving it to people who think this is more a good than a bad thing. But I see Apple as the one who has pissed on the parade. The person pointing out that the parade is being pissed on is not the one who ruined the parade. I actually have a good friend who has worked for Apple as a programmer for 20 years. He helped launch this project. He completely agrees with me about how it is being marketed. Of course, he and his team have no control over that, and they are trying to be celebratory about it finally reaching completion. This has been in the works for many years. It's just such a disappointment to see something you wanted for so long being "rained on" (we'll call it) by marketing decisions when it finally arrives.

    This situation is very different than what happened recently with Waves. In the Waves case, it was something that users had in their daily workflow for decades that they saw as being taken away from them. I didn't see a single post happy about it. This is not taking away something that was already in place, and is something that people have wanted so badly that it seems many are willing to go along with it. But it is something that will almost certainly have implications far beyond this particular product. It is annoying to hear users try to argue things from the vendor's perspective... This "has to happen in order for companies to stay profitable, etc." We can only guess about such things. We are customers. Our job is to get the best deal we can find, not make the vendor's argument for them. What we do know is: Apple was able to buy Logic from Emagic, kill off the PC version, and cut the price to the point where other DAWs could be put out of business. Surprisingly, that didn't happen. (IMO that was largely due to the fact that Logic had one of the most difficult interfaces to learn, at least at the time. BTW, my Apple-programmer friend I mentioned who worked on this project, is also a musician, and he doesn't use Logic! Like me, he found the interface most "illogical" in many ways.) But the point is, Apple could do this, and lots of other things that other companies couldn't or wouldn't, because their business model was based on selling hardware. And they have become one of the most profitable companies in the world, enabling them to do things, and even steer the industry, like nobody else. I believe they are doing this as part of a larger trend to position themselves as a "services" company. I find that troubling. Best to all my fellow end users!

    well said and it's a shame some forum members would have any issue with you making comments regardless of if it is perceived positive or negative.

    it just a discussion...

    Just in case you were referring to me, I made it very clear that i think these opinions should be represented. I just thought it better to have a separate thread, rather than 'pissing on the parade' ( ;) )of those of us who are happy about the news.

    Edit: And here it is:

    https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/55433/about-logic-and-fcp-subscriptions-and-united-consumers-power#latest

  • @Littlewoodg said:

    @richardyot said:

    @Littlewoodg said:
    i subscribe to chess apps
    and i suck at chess, so…

    i haven’t read the thread (impatience, probably why i suck at chess)
    does the ipad version have Live Loops feature (the clip laincher)
    seems a no brainer on ipad

    Yes Live Loops is included according to Apple’s product page

    thanks @richardyot

    I havent kept up with the thread, and you may have already answered, but I was curious whats your thinking on this upcoming release?

    I'm excited about the possibilities. To be fair I don't feel like I'm missing anything at the moment - I can do all I need with the combination of Auria Pro and NS2, but it will be good to have everything in one app and also not to have to worry about your key apps being abandoned.

Sign In or Register to comment.