Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

The Greenwood Massacre Centennial

123457

Comments

  • @instrument6 said:

    And before anyone gets into their “this is fascism” garbage , the site is run by a Jew.

    Welcome to the forum, Instrument6. Although why anyone would need to create a sock-puppet account to post links to fascist fanfic is anybody's guess.

  • @wim said:

    @McD said:.
    Art is our most powerful tool of persuasion.

    Facts are even better for some of us.

    I do love facts since I’m Scientish (spelling intended).

    But the hearts of men are moved by art.

    If you’re brain is sufficiently powerful it rarely entertains emotional argument. Emotions are often at odds with facts and can prove to be an unreliable sensor for external events.

    But the key is moving groups into actions.

    The truly cerebral rarely take up arms because the future is doomed to look just like the past under new management.

    There’s not much hope facts will suddenly change things for the better but they are the threads we weave into cogent historical summaries. The kind that don’t move you. “Bury...” changed my view of American empire and it’s limitless greed.
    I read it during the Vietnam era where a generation said no to a senseless War. Then lived to see more senseless wars driven by our fears of others. We got played and acted like the doomed bully does in a teenage rom com. Humiliated as big but so, so dumb.

  • @NeuM said:

    @McD said:

    @NeuM said:

    What is your opinion regarding US Civil War monuments removed by mobs in a fit of outrage versus people being reminded of history with monuments remaining in full view? Is history removed history forgotten?

    I’m against statues lamenting the “Lost Cause”. I can learn about the Civil War history with a visit to the library. Most of those statues were erected by Daughters of the South in response to civil rights advances. They are tributes to white denial.

    Find me a status of Hitler or his Generals and I’ll see you’ve made some kind of relevant point but frankly you have only disclosed yet another blindspot. Robert E. Lee was not an American Patriot and the country he served was disbanded but has never ceased the struggle to affirm a distinct social order I find repugnant. He deserves no honor for his crimes against humanity. Slavery is an amoral policy to affirm at any time.

    Statues of Christopher Columbus are also a salve to Italian immigrants that needed to have a heroic reference in US history and a reason for identity parades. It doesn’t change history and removing the statues is helpful to expose more blind spots. We can face reality and learn from the exercise.

    Thanks for asking. Your Mob is often my organized protest.

    I don’t doubt the conviction of the 1/6 Mob that they believe the lies of their Dear Leader.
    They were protesting an election using violence. They had a lot of help from the men who guard the Nation... the truth will out even if Congress doesn’t investigate it on TV.

    Would you believe it if I told you the Civil War was waged by the Federal government over the southern states threatening to leave the union and not over slavery? That’s a historical fact. And I don’t even hail from or align any of my beliefs with slave owners in the South.

    Not really, as the two were inextricably tied together. Southern states wanted to secede so that they would not be bound by changes in slave laws.

  • edited June 2021

    ...

  • edited June 2021

    @NeuM said:

    @McD said:

    @NeuM said:

    What is your opinion regarding US Civil War monuments removed by mobs in a fit of outrage versus people being reminded of history with monuments remaining in full view? Is history removed history forgotten?

    I’m against statues lamenting the “Lost Cause”. I can learn about the Civil War history with a visit to the library. Most of those statues were erected by Daughters of the South in response to civil rights advances. They are tributes to white denial.

    Find me a status of Hitler or his Generals and I’ll see you’ve made some kind of relevant point but frankly you have only disclosed yet another blindspot. Robert E. Lee was not an American Patriot and the country he served was disbanded but has never ceased the struggle to affirm a distinct social order I find repugnant. He deserves no honor for his crimes against humanity. Slavery is an amoral policy to affirm at any time.

    Statues of Christopher Columbus are also a salve to Italian immigrants that needed to have a heroic reference in US history and a reason for identity parades. It doesn’t change history and removing the statues is helpful to expose more blind spots. We can face reality and learn from the exercise.

    Thanks for asking. Your Mob is often my organized protest.

    I don’t doubt the conviction of the 1/6 Mob that they believe the lies of their Dear Leader.
    They were protesting an election using violence. They had a lot of help from the men who guard the Nation... the truth will out even if Congress doesn’t investigate it on TV.

    Would you believe it if I told you the Civil War was waged by the Federal government over the southern states threatening to leave the union and not over slavery? That’s a historical fact. And I don’t even hail from or align any of my beliefs with slave owners in the South.

    You said “(y)our Mob is often my organized protest.” Organized protests are 100% OK with me. Arson, assault, looting, robbery, murder and promoting Marxist propaganda are problems.

    As a white southerner from a long line of white southerners would you believe it if I told you people who spread this kind of revisionism are hateful dangerous pieces of uneducated cancerous shit and I’d be happy to be banned from this forum for saying so?

  • Well NeuM it’s either you or me that ExAsperis99 is directing his comments to,I reckon it’s you-because we seem to be the only posters that have Triggered the majority of this thread I get zero responses to my posts.

  • edited June 2021

    Cant stop accidentally double posting. Sorry!

  • edited June 2021

    @NeuM said:

    ......

    What is your opinion regarding US Civil War monuments removed by mobs in a fit of outrage versus people being reminded of history with monuments remaining in full view? Is history removed history forgotten?

    Monuments glorifying traitors that fought for the right to enslave people don't really teach history. Most of those monuments were built post-reconstruction by people sympathetic to the secessionist cause who were trying to reframe their traitorous pro-enslavement war as some sort of noble act.

    NeuM also said: Would you believe it if I told you the Civil War was waged by the Federal government over the southern states threatening to leave the union and not over slavery? That’s a historical fact. And I don’t even hail from or align any of my beliefs with slave owners in the South.

    I would not believe that because it is not true. It is a historical fact (read the various declarations of secession for documentation) that the confederate states seceded to protect slavery. The notion that the Civil War was fought over something else is another one of those post-reconstructionist artifacts. Here is one of many articles that you can find that provide primary documents so that you can read the actual words.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/what-this-cruel-war-was-over/396482/

    If you want historical monuments related to the Civil War and the South, the most prominent monuments should educate people about the practices of enslaving people and document the savage inhumane practice of enslavement -- and the abhorrent views that made enslavement possible.

    Germans are aware of their history because such awareness was forced on them by the allies. In the U.S., we have never come to grips with our past and we don't teach it well.

  • @JeffChasteen said:

    @Gravitas said:

    @LinearLineman said:

    @ExAsperis99 said:

    @SirMcp said:
    For those that mentioned the Watchmen tv series, kudos and it tied in to the comic with Hooded Justice. Just brilliant and no disrespect to Alan Moore because he has great disdain for adaptations and new material based on his creations.

    For an alternative opinion on the subject.

    Watch it at your own risk I just saw and still don’t know how to process it…like the time I read ‘A People’s History of the United States’.

    I’m not affiliated with the person who made the content so please don’t direct your complaints or praise at me. I don’t know what to think of it.

    Sickened. Such a sadness.

    “I watched a couple of videos about Tulsa.. I did a little research”. What a scholar. But he’s right about the origins of Tulsa. What he misses in his analysis is “measured response”. We’re fortunate he’s not the Secretary of State. The efforts of BLM may go astray, but in no way does it counter the Trail Of Tears blacks have endured. I’d say blacks have been pretty restrained in their responses.

    Agreed.

    This is a man who nitpicks history to serve his own sense of self. I guess he has not been a victim of voting or employment/education discrimination or police brutality.

    He says 96% of whites didn’t own slaves... I heard an interviewer talkin to a MAGA guy... he said his family difn’t own slaves... they couldn’t afford them! This fellow is self sabotaging his own best interests. “Logical” thinking is not always very logical. Wise people see the inconsistencies but also grasp, and even use it for the greater good. This is a microscopic thinker.

    I'm typing this whilst I'm listening.

    He doesn't realise that he already has been a victim of voting
    or employment or education or discrimination.
    It shows in his rhetoric, forgive me for saying this, especially his education.

    Oh my good gosh.

    Self hatred is so sad.

    He doesn't even realise that in the times of the
    Tulsa Massacre the BLM movement didn't exist.

    I will agree black men did hold slaves.
    It's a difficult thing to acknowledge along the lines of
    how African's sold slaves to the Europeans.

    I did the soundtrack for a documentary for
    PBS and the BBC in that regards back in the 90's
    when black historians in the Cote D'Ivorie
    stated that Africans sold Africans into slavery because
    some were prisoners of War and some were because of trade.
    Quite controversial at the time.
    Regardless that's anecdotal.

    Black slave ownership was a way to manage slaves.

    It provided a structure.

    Masters
    Slave masters benefited by having access to women, wealth and weapons.
    The slave masters could speak the same languages as the slaves.
    Slaves

    Now, I'm speaking as a black person.

    This is the main reason why some black people fail.
    It's because individuals in searching for acceptance start
    to repeat the rhetoric that pleases their environment.

    This speaker is also hating upon his own people and culture.
    He is demonising his own people, he refers to them as dogs
    and something that many racists say which is b!!!!!!ds.
    I'm using the expletive, the speaker in this video used illegitimate,
    I've heard that phrase quite often here in the U.K.

    That's so pitiful.

    Wow.

    This is so sad.

    I will agree there are good people and bad people.
    No argument there.

    Still, it's his reality and his beliefs.
    Same as mine or anyone else.

    My problem is I hear hatred in his rhetoric.
    I don't hear love.

    I also hear mendacity in his rhetoric.

    Interesting that you hear mendacity in his rhetoric.
    That word pretty much sums up the whole video.
    Even a lie has an element of truth.

    Still, I left the discussion last night for a reason.
    I jokingly added this morning ' What's new?'.

    The reply was "nothing" so I'm staying out of it.
    He's got his attention for the thread and predictably
    he'll have something to say about my comment here.
    If he doesn't? I'll be surprised.

    The memory of the Tulsa Massacre is in a way being 'honoured',
    by discussing some very, very serious issues.
    We've also heard from someone who grew up with
    bombs and shootings and though the war has stopped
    in his country the hatred continues and I feel for him
    as not every war or battle is fought with bombs and guns.

    I've also learnt that facts are merely opinions.
    One moment, that should be "some facts are merely opinions.

    If a discussion is pointless then it's not a discussion
    it's simply a bar room brawl with an audience.

    If it's bar room brawl?
    At the very least buy a round of drinks, make it worth everyones while.

    I'm going to play with my homemade
    virtual 32 step drum machine that I built myself.

    It's fun.

    I've got flashing lights and everything.

    On a serious note.

    For the people who were killed in that horrific event
    and for the many horrific events that have happened since then.

    My sorrow.

    I hope that if there is life after this one and that they found
    something that loved them rather than the hate that killed them.

    Peace.

    ✊🏽
    RIP
    🙏🏽

  • @Greenie said:
    Well NeuM it’s either you or me that ExAsperis99 is directing his comments to,I reckon it’s you-because we seem to be the only posters that have Triggered the majority of this thread I get zero responses to my posts.

    That’s only bc this is the grown-ups table and we’re trying to have a conversation.

  • edited June 2021

    There is no profit in condemnation. And the benefit of the doubt works... for awhile....” fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice... well, that just ain’t gonna happen” - GW Bush

    @NeuM, I think most educated people understand the Civil War, for Lincoln, did not start out as an anti slavery issue. He desperately wanted to keep the Union intact, tho the abolitionist movement was hot and heavy. Lincoln would have shipped the slaves to Liberia. The Emancipation Proclamation was expeditious to turn the war around. Does that make it any fucking better?
    At least Lincoln recognized we all have better and worse angels of our nature.

    The Jews in ancient Israel had slaves. In many cases the slave had to be treated better than the master.. and all slaves were manumitted every seven years. That’s pretty ancient shit. As Flanders and Swann once sang... “Eating people is wrong”....no matter how you package it.

    I totally agree anyone of any race can be racist. I also admit race issues were just not on my radarfor over half a century. So I don’t have a history of seeing everything as racist. But I am here now and a bit more conscious. You can eliminate all the human failings and personal agendas on both sides of the issue and it seems rather clear that what’s going on in 2021 America is a struggle for white guys to keep their grasp on the insignificant rung of the ladder they are dangling from. They just don’t get that demographically they are dinosaurs and that immigrants in this country don't even want that greasy rung. They’ll simply climb over them as their aging bodies expire and drop off like rotten fruit. That is why they are so desperate and will abandon democracy if it ain’t the road to their self preservation as they see it.

    Will the next lot be any better? Simply, not likely. But attitudes do change. Interracial marriage used to be a big whoop. Now racists proudly display their children’s interracial offspring... like that changes their spots. Just remember... eating people is wrong.

  • The notion that BLM is a movement that promotes violence or racism is wrong. The vast majority of BLM supporters are opposed to racism in all its forms. It is certainly possible (even likely) that there are people in the movement that have racist sentiments but that doesn't say anything about the movement.

    It also isn't a Marxist organization. Are there socialists and Marxists who participate? Probably. There are also socialists and Marxists in many churches, mosques and synagogues. That doesn't make any of those things Marxist.

  • Grown up table ,resulting in Facist accusations,trying to have a conversation, typical leftist CRT Marxism legsmechanical

  • @espiegel123 said:
    The notion that BLM is a movement that promotes violence or racism is wrong. The vast majority of BLM supporters are opposed to racism in all its forms. It is certainly possible (even likely) that there are people in the movement that have racist sentiments but that doesn't say anything about the movement.

    Agreed.

    It also isn't a Marxist organization. Are there socialists and Marxists who participate? Probably. There are also socialists and Marxists in many churches, mosques and synagogues. That doesn't make any of those things Marxist.

    Agreed.

  • I appreciate the baiting try but you "three" will have to soldier along without me.

  • @ExAsperis99 said:
    I appreciate the baiting try but you "three" will have to soldier along without me.

    No one left behind.

    Your voice is equally as important as anyone else's
    even if all you do is read the comments.

  • @Greenie said:
    Grown up table ,resulting in Facist accusations,trying to have a conversation, typical leftist CRT Marxism legsmechanical

    And proud to be so. Now run long before it gets cold.

  • Maybe racism is not a “thing” but a lack or an absence. I think it’s a lack of the sense of a common humanity.
    For example, the composer Ned Rorem wrote somewhere that there is no such thing as “bad taste”, there’s only taste and lack of taste.

    The Persian poet Saadi (1258) writes:

    “All human beings are members of one frame,
    Since all, at first, from the same essence came.
    When time afflicts a limb with pain
    The other limbs at rest cannot remain.
    If thou feel not for other’s misery
    A human being is no name for thee."

  • I mean, if you're a fascist, do you have musical heroes? You're on a music forum, and pretty much every musician* hates you. It must be really weird.

    *With the exception of post-"Double Live Gonzo" Ted Nugent, I guess.

  • Can anyone unpack "Antifa" for me? I've never been fond of anarchists and they remind me of a lot of leftist groups that were infiltrated by foreign intelligence agencies to generate disruptions that induce fear.

    I believe BLM is a well meaning attempt to re-visit the abuses of power by police against people of color. Giving people guns and authorizing the use of deadly force when someone
    is afraid is a terrible way to create public safety.

    Anyone that has had a bad experience with police can relate. For me it's traffic tickets and
    how they tend to get handed out along the lines of county boundaries. I had to cross one
    to get to work and most of my tickets were given by policing the speed of the commuters leaving one county to enter the other. It's a game of public funding that abuses one group over another to raise revenues.

    Never forge that police forces are under the control of a local government and most governments tend to be corrupt... and so it goes.

    Power is not shared equally and some might think it's doled out on merit but that's rarely true. It's doled out by status and group loyalties. Convincing people to vote against their own self interest requires "agape" and the will to form a more just world. Its a battle to be waged for hearts and minds. It usually involves leadership and some blurring of factual realities...
    politics by any other name: activism, community organizer, civil rights worker or artist.

  • Antifa is not a thing. It’s an ideology that directly opposes fascism in all its forms. The idea that it’s an organization or has some overriding directive or hierarchy was invented whole cloth by the right to create a boogeyman to to scare their little Brads and Kelseys when they tuck them in at night.

    Little trash can throwing “anarchists” in skinny jeans are obnoxious but at least their heart’s in the right place.

  • @legsmechanical said:
    Antifa is not a thing. It’s an ideology that directly opposes fascism in all its forms. The idea that it’s an organization or has some overriding directive or hierarchy was invented whole cloth by the right to create a boogeyman to to scare their little Brads and Kelseys when they tuck them in at night.

    Little trash can throwing “anarchists” in skinny jeans are obnoxious but at least their heart’s in the right place.

    Thanks. Now explain the chaos of Seattle and Portland since facism took over the White House (that would be 2016 for me).

  • edited June 2021

    @McD said:

    @legsmechanical said:
    Antifa is not a thing. It’s an ideology that directly opposes fascism in all its forms. The idea that it’s an organization or has some overriding directive or hierarchy was invented whole cloth by the right to create a boogeyman to to scare their little Brads and Kelseys when they tuck them in at night.

    Little trash can throwing “anarchists” in skinny jeans are obnoxious but at least their heart’s in the right place.

    Thanks. Now explain the chaos of Seattle and Portland since facism took over the White House (that would be 2016 for me).

    Huh? Me? That sounds like a lot of work.

  • I'm going to switch to another @LinearLineman post that doesn't involve listening to music.

  • edited June 2021

    @legsmechanical said:
    Antifa is not a thing. It’s an ideology that directly opposes fascism in all its forms. The idea that it’s an organization or has some overriding directive or hierarchy was invented whole cloth by the right to create a boogeyman to to scare their little Brads and Kelseys when they tuck them in at night.

    Little trash can throwing “anarchists” in skinny jeans are obnoxious but at least their heart’s in the right place.

    What about Andy Ngo? Members of Antifa have tried twice now to murder him. We’re all opposed to murder here, right?

  • edited June 2021

    @espiegel123 said:
    The notion that BLM is a movement that promotes violence or racism is wrong. The vast majority of BLM supporters are opposed to racism in all its forms. It is certainly possible (even likely) that there are people in the movement that have racist sentiments but that doesn't say anything about the movement.

    It also isn't a Marxist organization. Are there socialists and Marxists who participate? Probably. There are also socialists and Marxists in many churches, mosques and synagogues. That doesn't make any of those things Marxist.

    One founder of BLM is a self-described “trained Marxist”… and that’s not even a quote taken out of context. The BLM site no longer lists “critical theory” as part of their movement (it did before), but critical theory is in fact, Marxism.

    Patrice Cullors is a Marxist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrisse_Cullors

    Alicia Garza supported socialist Bernie Sanders and is anti-capitalist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Garza

    Quote from PolitiFact page about BLM’s founders:

    _"We do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia, in particular, are trained organizers; we are trained Marxists. We are superversed on, sort of, ideological theories. And I think what we really try to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many Black folks."

    We didn’t find that Garza and Tometi have referred to themselves as Marxists. But the book publisher Penguin Random House has said Garza, an author, "describes herself as a queer social justice activist and Marxist."_

    https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/

    And what did/do Marxists want anyway?

    https://fee.org/articles/5-things-marx-wanted-to-abolish-besides-private-property/

  • wimwim
    edited June 2021

    So ... is the point here that being Marxist is somehow illegal? That one can't be anti-racism and Marxist at the same time? That all BLM'rs care only about political / economic ideology? That most of them do? That they're a threat to capitalism and democracy?

    Sincere question. I'm absolutely anti-Marxist myself, but it never crossed my mind since back in the 60's, when I was a kid and my parents were seeing them hiding in the cupboard ready to knife us, that it was wrong to be one.

    But, maybe that's not what you're saying. I'll admit to not super carefully reading all this thread.

  • @NeuM said:

    @espiegel123 said:
    The notion that BLM is a movement that promotes violence or racism is wrong. The vast majority of BLM supporters are opposed to racism in all its forms. It is certainly possible (even likely) that there are people in the movement that have racist sentiments but that doesn't say anything about the movement.

    It also isn't a Marxist organization. Are there socialists and Marxists who participate? Probably. There are also socialists and Marxists in many churches, mosques and synagogues. That doesn't make any of those things Marxist.

    One founder of BLM is a self-described “trained Marxist”… and that’s not even a quote taken out of context. The BLM site no longer lists “critical theory” as part of their movement (it did before), but critical theory is in fact, Marxism.

    Patrice Cullors is a Marxist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrisse_Cullors

    Alicia Garza supported socialist Bernie Sanders and is anti-capitalist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Garza

    Quote from PolitiFact page about BLM’s founders:

    _"We do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia, in particular, are trained organizers; we are trained Marxists. We are superversed on, sort of, ideological theories. And I think what we really try to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many Black folks."

    We didn’t find that Garza and Tometi have referred to themselves as Marxists. But the book publisher Penguin Random House has said Garza, an author, "describes herself as a queer social justice activist and Marxist."_

    https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/

    And what did/do Marxists want anyway?

    https://fee.org/articles/5-things-marx-wanted-to-abolish-besides-private-property/

    One of the founders identifying as Marxist doesn't make the organization Marxist.

    Also from the article you linked to: "Black Lives Matter has grown into a national anti-racism movement broadly supported by Americans, few of whom would identify themselves as Marxist."

    So, no, per the source you yourself cited, BLM is not a Marxist organization.

    As I said earlier, you will find Marxists active in many organizations (churches, etc) that doesn't make them Marxist organizations.

    Many Marxists (most in the West, I'd daresay) believe in and are deeply committed to freedom and justice and liberty. They aren't monsters.

  • I’m a Marxist. Can you milk me, Greg?

This discussion has been closed.